The Purim story is driven by an act of resistance: Mordecai’s refusal to bow to the authoritarian vizier Haman.
This simple defiance infuriates Haman, leading to the genocidal decree.
But it’s unclear why Mordecai refused to bow to Haman as this would seemingly have been standard protocol given Haman’s status. Two complementary explanations are:
A) As @yhazony argues, the move to elevate Haman was a worrisome authoritarian power grab that in ch.1, the king consulted an array of advisers & was broadly solicitous of the various provinces. So Mordecai was bravely standing up against rising authoritarianism.
B) The rabbinic sages (Esther Rabbah 6) suggested that Haman wore an idol around his neck. So the challenge then was religious rather than political.
But where did they get this idea from & what does it have to do with idea A?
It’s very well established (see Koller) that Esther is playing off Daniel. & in Daniel 3, you find a version of the same story but here *it’s golden statue* that the king uses to demand loyalty!
So here the political & religious aspects of the authoritarian push are fused (as they always are).
And of course this golden statue is referencing the granddaddy of all such stories, the #GoldenCalf!!!
(in part indirectly via I Kings)
This all dovetails with my argument for how the #GoldenCalf story- which appears to be purely religious but is actually deeply political- serves as a paradigm for how elites can can cater to aggrieved populists leading to worship of a Big Lie.
OK, if you're Shabbat-observant (& perhaps even if you're not), here's a take on this week's Torah portion (the story of the first Shabbat) that's guaranteed to put a big smile on your face!
<THREAD n=25>
OK, here's a description of a biblical moment that's notoriously challenging to understand. When the people discovered the flaky, frost-like substance on the ground, they were bewildered.
They turned to one another and said:
"Mān hu"
What does this mean?
"Hu" is straightforward: "it is" or "is it"
The problem is "mān."
It doesn't mean anything. It eventually becomes the name for this mysterious food. But at this point in the story, it means nothing. It's not a word!
Here's a quick sociological take on why it's an understandable mistake for well-meaning people to be uncomfortable with "Jew," & why this is not inconsistent with the idea that one should not call someone "Black"
Race is ultimately an act of social violence, a caste system foisted on people in order to dominate those at the bottom. @Isabelwilkerson's essay (haven't read the book yet, alas) captures this as well as anything I've read by sociologists & others:
My dad’s approach was to consider all the people involved- Jews, Germans, Poles, Ukrainians, French, etc as human beings & to try to understand how ordinary people could end up perpetuating such inhumanity & to grapple with the impossible dilemmas the victims faced.
Growing up when this was one of my dad’s interests & in the Orthodox (& broader) Jewish community, both in the US & (for long visits of various kinds) in Israel, exposed me to many survivors & to leading Holocaust scholars & scholarship. All incredible gifts from my dad (& mom)
Want to talk with your dean/chair about how we can be in-person in the fall?
Here are my rules of engagement:
1. I need to hear your assumptions about how public bathrooms (& spaces more generally; but bathrooms are key) would be used. If you haven’t thought about this, you’re not serious.
2. I need to hear your assumptions about whether there would be hybrid (some students online & some inperson) classes. If you haven’t thought this through with pros & cons (research on the topic, anyone?!), you’re not serious.
Want to understand how Trump's supporters (most white Americans) stand by him even when he suggests we might ingest poison as a COVID cure?
The answer can be gleaned from this line from a Rush Limbaugh screed: ihr.fm/2VEBNDz
What do I mean? <THREAD>
First a general observation: misinformation is generally understood as a problem of *gullibility*-- people believing the wrong things, especially when these things are dangerous for them or others.
Why are people gullible?
Could be due to 1 or more of 3 factors:
a) Laziness about seeking good info sources or interpreting the info obtained
b) Bias in seeking info sources or in interpreting the info obtained
c) Laziness or bias of info sources (media) upon which we rely, so even not-so-lazy, not-so-biased ppl are affected