#SupremeCourt hears a plea by a student from Dalit community who had qualified for Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Bombay but missed out on a seat because of failure to remit seat acceptance fees on time due to technical glitches
Authorities inform that there are no vacant seats
SC: You must deal with the student in humanitarian approach, this is just bureaucracy. you cannot be wooden. You have to create a seat !
Authority: there are no seats in zonal IIT
DYC J: A lot of times seats fall vacant. you can adjust him there. Please tell the chairperson that student cannot be left in the lurch, He is a dalit boy and he did not have the money. you must understand the realities of what happens on the ground. find a way out
DYC J: There will be judicial order against you and then it will be a problem for you. you must understand the reality of our social life. Talk to the petitioner and see if something can be conveyed to the student
Lawyer: All seats have been allocated. please pass directions under Article 142 so that we can create a seat and allocate the same. otherwise no seats available in entire IIT
Lawyer: there are 7 other students who too have missed out due to non payment of fees
SC: You must have a robust mechanism..everyone does not have multiple credit cards. so long they study for IIT entrance and student is deprived of admission
DYC J: There has to be some modality else only students from metropolitan city will join IITs.
DYC J: There should be some buffer for students who face these insurmountable hurdles.
Lawyer: thats why the grievance redressal mechanism exists
DYC J: Here the student was allotted IIT Bombay right?
SC ORDER: leave granted in SLP. the appellant appeared for the IIT JEE main exams in May 2021 and having qualified he appeared on oct 3 for IIT-JEE Advanced 2021 entrance exam
SC ORDER: Student secured an All India rank of 25,894 and within SC students, all india rank was 864. On october 15 first respondent had issued brochure citing business rules on joint seat allocation
SC ORDER: Rule 18 laid down rules on offer of seats. then the appellant was allocated B Tech civil engg seat in IIT Bombay. JSOO Portal was activated for online reporting till oct 31. online reporting included fees, document upload etc
SC ORDER: On oct 29 the appellant logged on to JSSO portal and uploaded documents. unfortunately the fees could not be paid as the student was short of funds and borrowed money from sister.
After arranging money, 10 to 12 attempts were made but payment could not be made due to technical error. Another attempt was made from a cyber cafe where same error occured, he called second respondent and emailed them too: SC Order
SC Order: based in UP student borrowed money to travel to the office of second respondent in kharagpur. Bombay HC was moved under article 226 seeking a writ to accept the fees and facilitate his admission. after being unsuccessful the student moved #SupremeCourt
SC ORDER: This court has before it a young dalit student who is on the verge of loosing a valued seat which has been allocated in IIT Bombay. the travails of appellant has taken him from allahabad to kharagpur then to bombay and then to delhi
SC: Having regard to facts of the case it would be a great travesty of justice if the young dalit student is denied admission for non payment of fees to IIT Bombay after having tried to do so. hence we are of the view that its a fit case of article 142 in interim stage
SC: We direct first and second respondent to ensure that seat allocated to the student be allocated to him in IIT Bombay and this should not disturb admission of any other student. creation of this seat will be subject to admission being regularised if seat falls vacant
SC: If the petitioner is not to be admitted in current academic year he will be ineligible to appear after two consecutive attempts.
[BREAKING] Supreme Court orders creation of a seat in IIT Bombay for Dalit student who was unable to pay 'seat acceptance fees' on time due to technical issues
#BombayHighCourt refuses to restrain #NawabMalik and #NCP party members from publishing any material against father of #SameerWankhede and his family members till pendency of his defamation suit.
“Although plaintiff has right to privacy, the defendant has right to freedom of speech and expression, there has to be balancing of fundamental rights” Court read order.
“Whether the tweets made contain allegations pertaining to discharge of official functions? Whether the publications prove to be false? Whether there was reasonable verification of facts?” Court read order
#SupremeCourt is hearing a petition challenging the change in the land use of a plot where the new official residences of the vice president and the Prime Minister are stipulated as part of the ambitious Centra Vista project in Delhi
Adv Shikhil Suri: Rejoinder has been filed
SC: You argue the case
Suri: I saw the time
SC: it's fine the time is for us and not you
Adv Suri: The point of having no recreational play area is not legal
SC: you have to show how the modification is not permissible in law
Suri: we are saying it's not in public interest and no use in converting a green area into residential one
#SupremeCourt is hearing a plea by “Utran Se Besthan Railway Jhopadpatti Vikas Mandal” against demolition of over 10,000 slum dwellers living near the railway lines in the city of Surat, Gujarat
Sr Colin Gonsalves: State says they are committed to implement Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana and rehabilitation is to be borne by executing agency which is railways here. Corporation has also washed it's hands off. Now they PMAY has to be adopted
SC: why in railway land and why not corporation or state land. PMAY cannot be in railway land
Gonsalves: Railways in their affidavitss say that encroachers on railway property is large and for this they want to clear 2.6 kms.
Supreme Court bench led by Justice MR Shah to hear Gujarat Govt in the Covid Death Compensation case. SC had rapped the state for "overreaching directions" by constituting Scrutiny Committee to compensate COVID Deaths #supremecourt
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta: Let me propose a solution
Justice Shah: we don't want to know the reason why or how something has not been done
SG: Please have it on Friday
Justice Shah: now they have come out with a list of documents to be submitted to scrutiny committee. what are you saying ! show us the application form
#SupremeCourt is hearing a public interest litigation regarding the operation of the 126-year-old Mullaperiyar Dam, a longstanding dispute between the states of Kerala and Tamil Nadu. #mullaperiyardam
Sr Adv Jaideep Gupta: there is a new writ petition filed. Writ was seeking finalising of all these matters.
Sr Adv Shekhar Naphade: please take these matters on a non miscellaneous day
SC: We have part heard on the NMD days
Gupta: the rule curve has to be settled now. we want the rule curve to be looked into. there is urgency in the sense that it needs to be heard