To be clear, half-time isn't going to be extended to 25 minutes (per a report today).

There won't be Superbowl-style half-time breaks.

It has to be discussed at The IFAB's ABM tomorrow, as it was proposed to the Football and Technical Advisory Panels last month by CONMEBOL.
Several members of the Football and Technical Advisory Panels raised concerns over the idea, particularly regarding the potential negative impact on player welfare and safety resulting from a longer period of inactivity.

The Panels will not be backing this resolution.
All matters raised at last month's meeting - the first step in Law changes for 2022-23 - must be discussed by the ABM.

The ABM then decides which Law changes go through to the AGM in March, which finalises any modifications to the Laws.
Any confederation can make representations to change any part of the Laws of the Game. Many are made every year.

For instance, this year UEFA made representations to modify the wording of the offside law.

Many ideas are discussed, few go forward to the AGM.
I also discussed this on @talkSPORT2 last month, when it was actually proposed by CONMEBOL, explaining why it wouldn't come into Law.

This is simply the next procedural step for The IFAB.

Now officially official as set out yesterday. The IFAB confirms there will be no plan to change half-time to 25 minutes.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dale Johnson

Dale Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DaleJohnsonESPN

24 Nov
On Thursday, it's the IFAB's ABM.

Why does it matter? It's the key meeting which essentially decides which Laws should be modified for the 2022-23 season.

This is the key part of the agenda. But what does this mean, and what is likely to change?
There are a series of proposals which will be discussed which aren't covered here.

For instance, sources have told me that the IFAB will definitely discuss the offside law - in particular the deliberate play of the ball that can make a player in an offside position onside.
The IFAB will discuss this aspect of offside, and possible options.

If deemed appropriate or indeed needed, the IFAB will consider changes to the wording of the offside law.

However, it may yet be deemed that further consultation is needed before any change is made.
Read 11 tweets
22 Nov
A pretty quiet weekend on the VAR front, but here's your Monday thread.

Looking at:
- Overturned Man City penalty + possible Silva pen
- Watford's penalty + retake scenario
- Joachim Andersen possible red card
- Harry Kane handball?
There's no doubt it was the correct decision to overturn Man City's first-half penalty against Everton.

From the replay first angles, it looks like there was knee-on-knee contact between Michael Keane and Raheem Sterling. But there was none.

Image
This incident shows perfectly why a time limit on VAR reviews is NOT a good thing.

Finding the crucial camera angle isn't always a instant thing.

First replays suggested it wasn't a clear and obvious error - until the VAR, Chris Kavanagh, checked the camera behind the goal. ImageImage
Read 16 tweets
25 Oct
Here's your Monday VAR thread, this week it includes:

- Arsenal's penalty against Villa, and VAR protocol
- Reds cards for Pogba / Saiss
- Christian Benteke disallowed goal
- Why Mathias Normann was only booked
- Brighton v Man City incidents
Starting with the Arsenal penalty itself.

Referee Craig Pawson thought Matt Targett won the ball first, before contact with Alexandre Lacazette.

But replays show it was the other way around - contact through the man to win the ball - and that's grounds for a penalty review.
So onto the VAR protocol.

I said on Friday that play should continue while a review is completed, but that's not quite right.

VAR protocol says that the referee should try to "avoid having a review after the whistle for the end of the half has been blown."
Read 21 tweets
22 Oct
Unlike Brighton vs. Man Utd, Arsenal penalty wasn't awarded after whistle for half had gone.

Referee Craig Pawson stopped play in a neutral area before HT whistle to review, per protocol.

That's why Aubameyang could score rebound. If HT blown, play stops at save. #ARSAVL
Craig Pawson blows once to stop play in a neutral area. He does not "blow for half-time" as we all know referees do with a series of whistles.

He then whistles a couple of times for attention and beckons them to stay on the field, indicating there is a review.
VAR protocol says it's better play carries on during review at the end of the half.

Foul by Targett happened on 46.56, and play continued for 45 seconds until stopped in a neutral area when monitor advised.

Play restarts at 46.56 with the pen, so rebound could be scored.
Read 4 tweets
10 Oct
Interesting application of offside in the #UEFANationsFinal for Kylian Mbappe's winner.

It's a decision which is correct in law to allow the goal, but one which many will feel should be disallowed in the spirit of the game.

Mbappe is clearly offside when the pass is played.
Remember that being in an offside position is not an offside offence.

The point when the ball is touched by the passer purely sets each player's position relative to each other for offside.

It's what happens after this which decides if there is any offence.
This is the clause which is key to the onside decision in the Kylian Mbappe goal.

"A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball, including by deliberate handball, is not considered to have gained an advantage."
Read 12 tweets
10 Oct
Wondering when the next edition of the UEFA Nations League is?

- Draw is on December 16
- England in pot 3 and face a very strong group
- Games played in June 2022 (x4), September 2022 (x2)
- UNL takes up the six international dates prior to the World Cup
- Finals in June 2023
England will be drawn against one team from each of these three pots to form their group.

POT 1
Belgium
France
Italy
Spain

POT 2
Portugal
Netherlands
Denmark
Germany

POT 4
Wales
Austria
Czech Republic
Hungary
Format for Euro 2024 qualifying is not yet confirmed, including any details of how teams might earn playoff spots via the Nations League.

It's likely UEFA will want playoff paths via this route, though the same method as 2020 cannot be used as Germany take an auto slot as hosts.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(