Unlike Brighton vs. Man Utd, Arsenal penalty wasn't awarded after whistle for half had gone.

Referee Craig Pawson stopped play in a neutral area before HT whistle to review, per protocol.

That's why Aubameyang could score rebound. If HT blown, play stops at save. #ARSAVL
Craig Pawson blows once to stop play in a neutral area. He does not "blow for half-time" as we all know referees do with a series of whistles.

He then whistles a couple of times for attention and beckons them to stay on the field, indicating there is a review.
VAR protocol says it's better play carries on during review at the end of the half.

Foul by Targett happened on 46.56, and play continued for 45 seconds until stopped in a neutral area when monitor advised.

Play restarts at 46.56 with the pen, so rebound could be scored.
I'll run through the protocol on this in more detail on Monday.

Craig Pawson didn't get it quite right, but the end result was still correct for Arsenal to be able to score the penalty on the rebound.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dale Johnson

Dale Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DaleJohnsonESPN

25 Oct
Here's your Monday VAR thread, this week it includes:

- Arsenal's penalty against Villa, and VAR protocol
- Reds cards for Pogba / Saiss
- Christian Benteke disallowed goal
- Why Mathias Normann was only booked
- Brighton v Man City incidents
Starting with the Arsenal penalty itself.

Referee Craig Pawson thought Matt Targett won the ball first, before contact with Alexandre Lacazette.

But replays show it was the other way around - contact through the man to win the ball - and that's grounds for a penalty review. ImageImageImage
So onto the VAR protocol.

I said on Friday that play should continue while a review is completed, but that's not quite right.

VAR protocol says that the referee should try to "avoid having a review after the whistle for the end of the half has been blown."
Read 21 tweets
10 Oct
Interesting application of offside in the #UEFANationsFinal for Kylian Mbappe's winner.

It's a decision which is correct in law to allow the goal, but one which many will feel should be disallowed in the spirit of the game.

Mbappe is clearly offside when the pass is played.
Remember that being in an offside position is not an offside offence.

The point when the ball is touched by the passer purely sets each player's position relative to each other for offside.

It's what happens after this which decides if there is any offence.
This is the clause which is key to the onside decision in the Kylian Mbappe goal.

"A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball, including by deliberate handball, is not considered to have gained an advantage."
Read 12 tweets
10 Oct
Wondering when the next edition of the UEFA Nations League is?

- Draw is on December 16
- England in pot 3 and face a very strong group
- Games played in June 2022 (x4), September 2022 (x2)
- UNL takes up the six international dates prior to the World Cup
- Finals in June 2023
England will be drawn against one team from each of these three pots to form their group.

POT 1
Belgium
France
Italy
Spain

POT 2
Portugal
Netherlands
Denmark
Germany

POT 4
Wales
Austria
Czech Republic
Hungary
Format for Euro 2024 qualifying is not yet confirmed, including any details of how teams might earn playoff spots via the Nations League.

It's likely UEFA will want playoff paths via this route, though the same method as 2020 cannot be used as Germany take an auto slot as hosts.
Read 4 tweets
4 Oct
Welcome to another Monday VAR thread. Some protocol bits to explain around some decisions. Fill yourself with rage.

Including:
- Timo Werner disallowed goal / Ward-Prowse red
- Penalty to Leeds?
- Watford "goal"
- Tim Krul on Matej Vydra
- Liverpool v Man City incidents
Starting with Timo Werner's disallowed goal against Southampton.

This all comes down to VAR protocol and what constitutes the Attacking Phase, and is something which I particularly dislike about the process.

To begin with, Attacking Phase isn't reset by a failed clearance.
We get one of these in the Premier League every now and again but as VAR in the PL usually doesn't go back too far in the Attacking Phase, it's rare.

In other leagues fouls some way back in the Attacking Phase are penalised far more regularly.
Read 23 tweets
20 Sep
Strap yourselves in. It's time. The Monday VAR thread, this week featuring:

- Overturned penalties!
- Penalties! Penalties! Penalties!
- Ivan Toney disallowed goal / handball
- Offside decisions

It's just like old times.....
Let's preface this by saying that VAR had actually been pretty decent this season.

But this weekend saw the good, bad, ugly, contentious and ridiculous.

Remember, I try to explain VAR process, how/why a decision might/might not be made and discuss its merits.
Let's start with the simple one, Burnley's cancelled penalty vs. Arsenal.

UEFA referees' chief Roberto Rosetti said before Euro 2020 that a key trigger for a penalty review is if a player gets a touch on the ball.

That doesn't rule out a penalty, but is a key consideration.
Read 34 tweets
13 Sep
Not too much to discuss in this week's Monday VAR thread, well until yesterday...

- Harvey Elliot challenge, Patrick Struijk red card
- Liverpool's second goal at Leeds
- Arsenal's winner at Norwich
- Crystal Palace penalty vs. Spurs
Let's start at Elland Road by covering the process behind the red card for Patrick Struijk.

Craig Pawson didn't actually give a free-kick for the challenge when it happened, so the red card came afterwards.

Many ask how he can give a red if he hasn't given a foul.
Once play was stopped for Harvey Elliot to get treatment, referee Pawson spoke to his on-field team, including Andy Madley who was 4th official and was close to the incident.

It was Pawson's decision, in conjunction with his officiating team, to show the red card.
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(