“But it will overwhelm our hospitals!”

Hospitals are operated for the benefit of society. For almost two years, we have forgotten that, and endeavoured instead to operate society for the benefit of hospitals.
Yes, it’s possible that in some places, rising infections may reduce standards of care for a time. Your hospitals will not ColLapSe or MelT DoWN, but it may be more difficult to get treatment.
In most of our countries, containment has already effectively restricted access to treatment for a long time now, so this state of affairs will not be new, it will just be more of the same.
The problem of OvERWheLmEd HoSpiTAlS is moreover not unique to Corona, and it did not suddenly befall us in the earliest months of 2020. Annual flu seasons have, for decades now, pushed hospitals across the west to the limits of their capacity.
There are a lot of forces at work here, including corporatist economising, cost disease, and above all, increasingly elaborate, resource-intensive, dehumanising, and ultimately futile end-of-life care. The latter is a big part of what is happening in your OvERwHelMEd HoSPiTALs.
The vast majority of the healthy population does not need constant access to medical care, and a lot of the care our healthcare systems provide is of highly questionable utility. Millions and millions of people have not seen the inside of a hospital since all of this took off.
All virus restrictions need to be lifted, & hospitals need to prioritise care & manage resources as best as possible through the winter, as they always have. They will not melt, though some diseases may go neglected for a time — as they have already as a result of restrictions.
If more capacity is truly needed, then governments should go about actually encouraging its development in the longer term, rather than house arresting their entire populations in futile and increasingly insane efforts to eradicate pervasive respiratory viruses.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with eugyppius

eugyppius Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @eugyppius1

27 Dec
Liberal democracy has given us pointless wind turbines on every horizon, mass immigration, the World Economic Forum, femael suffrage, Corona lockdowns, and the EU. Herewith, a thread on why liberal democracy is so bad.
Political power has a will of its own. It wants a single locus. Liberal democracy is premised on the idea that you can divide power among the people, place it in different regime silos (the judiciary, the parliament), and keep it fragmented.
In practice this just means that power in liberal democratic systems accrues over time to suboptimal, dysfunctional, illegible, unknown organisations and systems - the bureaucratic institutions.
Read 13 tweets
25 Dec
Will probably regret this thred later, but mainly I tweet about things I am thinking about. I am sincerely grateful for all of my Substack readers, and yet the phenomenon of angry unsubscribers has since November become a source of amusement to me.
There are first of all those I am least patient with, namely the lot who accuse me of being a grifter. I don’t know what to say here: It takes a lot of time and effort to write these pieces, and most are free anyway.
Then there are the lot who say I write too much. That was mainly in November, when I had a lot of momentum and I resolved to poast nearly every day, and with a few early mornings/ late nights almost managed it.
Read 6 tweets
24 Dec
Bad metaphor. A better one: in an effort to stop all football fouls, players are screened prior to matches for biomarkers predictive of red cards, and preemptively excluded on that basis. The system excludes so many players, matches become mostly impossible. …
Those few that still go ahead see just as many red cards as before. Defenders of the system respond to their failure by asserting that there would be *even more* red cards without their dumb screening system.
Then they switch tactics and say players can be exempt from screening if they just take foul-preventing injections prior to matches. These injure an unknown number of players but also don’t have any measurable effect on fouls.
Read 5 tweets
20 Dec
rare strategy poast:

1) Critical (& investigative) journalism is dead. Everything put out by major broadcast & print media is low-effort narcicissm poasting masterminded by uni interns & racially/ sexually obsessed lunatics. Stop being mad about this. It is opportunity.
2) Longer form journalism is a field almost entirely open to us. There is no competition, people want to know what is happening, they want to have comment sections where they can discuss this insanity, and their heretofore trusted newspapers feed them nothing but agitprop garbage
3) I think Substack is interesting platform we should explore & consider colonising. The email subscriber lists make our accounts resilient to banning. Look at successful Substack authors: Many of them are writing precisely in areas ignored or sidelined by our broken press.
Read 5 tweets
19 Dec
Since nationwide house arrests were introduced, we've seen pervasive manipulation of scientific & media information, to create support for & encourage compliance with containment. This has in turn corrupted and hystericised the information available even to policymakers.
The people steering containment very obviously have only the most tenuous understanding of what is happening and what their policies can achieve, since they have repurposed most of their information sources to churn out constant streams of panic propaganda.
This is by the way one of the most important reasons, why technocratic fantasies of ScIENcE or FaCT BaSEd PoliCIeS are stupid. Scientific inquiry is, always will be, subordinate to political power. As soon as you set about trying to base something on ScIENcE ...
Read 5 tweets
18 Dec
This is the right idea. 1/4
2/4
3/4
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(