This is the only article on astrology that I've ever read bc I've always thought it was bullshit. But this one made me think twice. It was written by @BigelowInst award-winner, Stephen Braude, who usually focuses on life after death and parapsychology.
2 "I married a remarkable woman who, in addition to being exceptionally well educated and intelligent, with impeccable credentials in both clinical and experimental psychology as well as psychometric research, was also an apparently gifted astrologer, capable of making reliable,
3 "detailed, and accurate predictions. I needed to understand what was going on, and I needed to probe her claim that she was doing something quite different from what the vast majority of so-called astrologers were doing."
4 And if you think UFOs or related phenomena (poltergeist) are caused/created by our consciousness and not external entities, Braude's book, "The Gold Leaf Lady," will interest you. The woman who he investigated was apparently exuding (worthless) gold leaf from her body.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Putting finishing touches (chapters) on my interview with @g_knapp & Colm Kelleher from a few weeks ago. It will be up late tonight and I'll have multiple transcripts (related to "Skinwalkers at the Pentagon") on my blog to go along with it.
@g_knapp Kelleher touched on the Project Hessdalen engineers and paranormal effects they experienced at home. I certainly had never heard that before.
1 #ufotwitter - @Travis_Tritten (TT): "I wanted to ask you about this new #UAP office that was created by @DepSecDef - Hicks and announced last week. The Aerial Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group."
2 TT: "It's a mouthful. Was there any coordination with lawmakers on Capitol Hill that are proposing related legislation like @RepRubenGallego & @gillibrandny? And secondly, some former Pentagon officials who had worked on this issue, @ChrisKMellon & @LueElizondo, have said that
3 TT: "this is an effort for the Pentagon to be less transparent...
JK: "Hmm."
TT: "...on UAPs. And I was just wondering if u had any response?"
JK: "On the first one, I can't speak to pending legislation, obviously, I'd refer to those members. But we absolutely kept members
1/2 @ODNIgov Avril Haines, “Extraterrestrially”and @julianbarnes@nytimes editing the original article. Note: I’m not suggesting anything nefarious here.
2/2 @ODNIgov Avril Haines, “Extraterrestrially”and @julianbarnes@nytimes editing the original article. Note: I’m not suggesting anything nefarious here.
3 Yes, articles get updated all the time & info. added. That's why my focus was on Barnes saying Haines was not necessarily referring to space aliens but rather meteors & solar flares. Nobody believes that except maybe 4 Barnes. Let's see if he can clarify where he got that from.
1 Yes, & I agree w/@SnakePo9 & think it's possible. @inf3rence was leading the discussion on this & I'm just seeing it now. Talk 2 some who worked in the world of defense/intel their entire lives & they MAY see it differently than how I do here. I've encountered opposition. #ufo
2 For this convo, let's assume that we have an intact, minimally operational, non-human craft & the cadavers of multiple non-humans. It's all in two USAPs w/no oversight except the handful of folks with knowledge of said programs. Releasing the information on the bodies is a
3 no-brainer 2 me as the world deserves 2 know this. So, f**k any nat sec argument on that. Of course, there WILL be folks who say we need 2 study the bodies 2 see if we can exploit any of their biological uniqueness & try to transfer it 2 benefit our soldiers on the battelfield.