This company was one I use to bash a lot for its valuation when it was up over $70. Now, I am recommending it. It has strong fundamentals and a cheap valuation. Let us take a look.
1/ This company is made of of 2 parts. The first is the software business which they developed. Its about physics based chemistry to predict how proteins will move and targeting them with therapies.
2/ They license their software to over 1,500 global companies and have over 25 partnerships for the use of their software in drug development.
3/ The amount of revenues they make from the actual software is nothing that big. They do about $100 million a year in sales with a slow 15% ish growth rate. The important part about the software sales is it helps pay for the clinical development of their pipeline.
4/ They also have a broad ability to collaborate with companies with programs that will yield them royalties or even equity stakes.
5/ The other half of their business is their own clinical pipeline which excites a biotech investor like me. They have some very big potential candidates if they pan out in the clinic.
6/ Their first program is for MALT1. This is a key pathway that links the B cell receptor activation to the NF kappa B pathway which controls inflammation cytokine release.
7/ This plays a key role in a subset of B cell cancers that are driven by MALT1 signaling. The first will be the 30% to 40% of DLBCL that is MALT1 related. This program should reach the clinic next year.
8/ The next program is CDC7. This is a key in initiating DNA synthesis during the cell cycle. Its believed it plays a key role in patients that become resistant to CDK4/6 inhibitors. This could be a very big drug in combo with those drugs.
9/ This is currently in IND enabling studies. It could be in the clinic later in 2022. The CDK4/6 inhibitor market reached about $7 billion in annual sales and about 10% of patients become resistant to those drugs.
10/ The last program is their WEE1 program. This is another pathway in the cell cycle. This one plays a role in checking the DNA quality before letting the cell advance from G2 to Mitosis.
11/ They are offering a potentially differentiated drug from the previous WEE1 inhibitors which had good data, but resulted in too much toxicity. This could offer a better alternative to the first generation drugs.
12/ The management team seems like a very good one for the limited time I have followed the company. I really like their CSO who is in charge of the clinical development. She sounds like a very sharp scientist.
13/ I think $SDGR offers a great value based on the software business and its many collaborators. It gives you a great and high potential pipeline and a revenue stream to fund the majority of it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This company gets no recognition as its not owned by some of the funds that lead to cult like status for some companies. They are probably one of the most disruptive companies in biotech.
1/ I think $SANA could be taking on all the things the CRISPR companies are doing ex-vivo and doing it in-vivo. They are combining 3 of the most powerful technologies in the market today with Fusogen, CRISPR and iPSC.
2/ The fact that this company is only at $3 billion market cap when they are at $5 to $10 billion is a gift for the retail investors. They could be bigger then all the CRISPR companies combined.
This is a concept I have seen investors ignore for my 25 years in the market. The market isn't always right, but usually it is. I learned that over the many years. I never discount what the market is trying to tell me.
1/ I made a lot of money over the years picking a few great companies long before anyone else ever knew who they were. That doesn't mean the market was wrong. Many times I see people load up on all these "cheap" companies.
2/ Those companies that are trading at $800 million or so when the rest of their peers are $3 to $10 billion. These companies aren't this cheap because the entirety of millions of investors around the world are clueless.
This has probably been the most bubbly space in biotech the past year. I dumped all these companies back in late January and only recently started buying any of them back.
I love the genomics space, but the cart is way ahead of the horse at this point. I think many of them are now down 50% or more from their highs as human behavior always goes from bubble to bust and back again. I still don't think any of these scream cheap yet.
The synthetic biology space is all about creating new biology. This is mostly around engineering yeast or bacteria to become tiny factories. This offers a sustainable resource for rare products.
I have:
$DNA 1.38%
$TWST 1.38%
$ARMS 2.06%
$CDXS .69%
This theme makes up 5.51% of my portfolio.
$DNA is the fan favorite for this space, but it also prices in a huge amount of success already. They focus on engineering microbes to be tiny factories to product products. They also engineer microbes for commercial products like probiotics.
I snagged back a starter position in $CRSP today. I had sold 90% of my position at $175 and the rest at $130. Today, I picked up a starter .69% position at $83.33. It might have lost its innovation for now, but it is the same tech and could do everything $NTLA can.
$ARK has been loading up on $NTLA which makes me want to avoid that like the plague as its just over priced and over hyped. I can take the bet on $CRSP for a fraction of that value. They will have a strong SCD program. I have low expectations for anything else.
I am betting they will get shift gears once they have SCD commercial and get on the ball with building their next great thing. Personally, I think they should scarf up $IPSC on the cheap for their cell therapies. Or at least do a license deal.