Every incremental person @YouTubeGaming takes increases the value of the remaining big twitch streamers. The pillars of twitch.
The negotiating leverage @REALMizkif , @Sykkuno@xQc@hasanthehun wield just increased, its like a high stakes game of creator musical chairs.
Twitch internally prob has a different perspective. They probably think the platform is where the lion share or value resides, to continue with the musical chairs analogy, the value accrues to the seats rather than the person sitting in it.
Netflix is an analog. Netflix shows
That they can license super popular content (friends, the office, etc), distribute it to their viewers then drop that content when it comes time to negotiate. Reed Hastings at Netflix uses view time as a kpi (quipping that netflix competes with video games and sleep) and it’s
likely that many twitch insiders feel emboldened by the the relative die-hardness (bleeding purple) of its user base. It could be argued that twitch viewers are on balance MORE hardcore than Netflix profiles given the 2hr/day avg Netflix watch time can be due to account sharing
I’m not so sure, but regardless this is interesting to see play out. YouTube feels like thanos here, inevitable. It’s strange to see twitch not paying up for biggest creators and slow pace of feature innovation given twitch’s parent company Amazon is no Stranger to
enduring “accounting losses” while they invest in new adjacencies.
Listening to the @TheStanzShow it really sounds like given Ludwig’s telling of the negotiations that twitch has failed to adhere to @JeffBezos’s “day 1” Philosophy.
It’s day 2 for twitch 🙁
If you squint Twitch sort of makes sense in $Amzn corporate strategy. Ads is one of the fastest growing “other” segment at amazon after AWS, and there seems to be a push for gaming.
Prime video is spending top dollar to lock in unique IP, but prime video adds value to the
amazon prime subscription bundle in a mental accounting sense. Twitch does not. Is The free prime sub, one of the biggest incentives for large creators going to be enough? Is the platform/seat really where
the value and thus loyalty accrues to in terms of viewers having to choose between fidelity to their favorite creator or to the platform (ui, features, community familiarity)? We’re all gonna find out 😐
Congrats to @LudwigAhgren , the feeling of a new adventure must be so liberating and exciting. Kudos for embarking upon something outside your comfort zone.
And to the rest of us,
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I bought Bitcoin at between $6,000 and $9,000 during 2020 at the urging of a well informed first who works at one of these Web 3.0 companies.
I didn’t really buy it as a speculation, it was a crude inflation hedge on the thesis that it was essentially digital gold. I keep a
Rolling and sizable cash position since I have pledged commitments to fund private equity and Real Estate PE investments so the amount I keep liquid can “seem” irresponsible (opposite of most people who have too little cash for emergencies). The solution was to hold 5% in BTC
core dump:
We have the accumulated knowledge of humanity literally in a portable device at our fingertips
-A & B (continued)
A.) It use to be that mere access to data gave you a HUGE competitive advantage. Now everyone has access , you need to be able to filter what is important and what is just noise. The biggest barrier is not not having enough information to make a decision, but having so
much that you can’t make sense of it.
B.) And yet some people still end up in my twitch chat angry at my existence and apparently unable to Find something they actually want to watch. Literally all of human knowledge, arts and entertainment in their hands, and
People refer to me as smart or a “ruthless biz woman” but I’ve never felt smart. I just feel like In each given scenario I’m doing the most logical / rational thing. To supplement/ make up for the imposter syndrome feeling I drive myself to work harder and harder. And then
Somewhere In that fog of war something magical happens. Pattern recognition kicks in, and when you think about and around a subject long enough you start to develop a proficiency with it (businessinsider.com/malcolm-gladwe…). You start
To succeed and then you find yourself becoming less resource constrained, then if you successfully solve for your “pain points” and allocate said resources to help you scale / delegate as much as you can you start to compound your advantage. People underestimate how far you
Most people overestimate what they can do in one year and underestimate what they can do in ten years.
I feel like people still don’t get that I’m pursuing an endowment like model for my animal shelter - most orgs fund as they going, which means they have to keep raising money to continue as a going concern
One of my favorite open roaming / non kennel kept dog shelters ran
Into problems during COVID when their traditional form of financing / raising money (through events and fund drives) ran into problems due to restrictions on gatherings. And they had low visibility online presence.
I have a hunch my online popularity is also fleeting so it
0nly Fans… most everyone being loud about this are getting the story wrong, a thread:
A lot of people are hung up about the head fakes and 0F scares of the preceding months and discounting this current reporting. Where there’s smoke there’s a 🔥.
Underneath the surface there
Is an eternal struggle between payment processors and legacy banking on one side, and sexy content and SWers on the other.
Anyone who thinks any potential shift in policy is solely up to only fans volition is dumb or selling you something. No beef with the fanhouse folks but
Their take is in part an attempt at differentiation + to build goodwill since if the initial reporting is true, they just lost a huge point of differentiation.
0F did 1.2 BILLION in free cash flow (in short money net of costs and expenses) the belief they are “pivoting” to
I made a bet 1 years ago that Facebook would soon be a $trillion company despite regulatory troubles, FTC dismissed the suit, and fb crossed 1T same day ….. how you like dem apples @yDonateTwitch
Also when @pokimanelol tweeted about “which stonk to buy” I pitched $FB
In before someone comes in and says “but so and so company did better”
The point was I picked a company I could actually understand that greatly outperformed indexing (+28% over the same period). Facebook was up 85%, and is still arguably “cheap” today (not advice)
Like, yea I’ll take my 61% annualized returns tyvm