The IPL retention money has already been discussed but this is my take... small #thread
Technically, if four capped players are retained, Rs 42 cr must get deducted from franchise's salary purse; If three capped players are retained: Rs 33 cr; Two: Rs 24 cr; One: Rs 14 cr. (1/8)
Now, MI have retained four capped players at Rs 16 cr (Rohit), Rs 12 cr (Bumrah), Rs 8 cr (Surya) and Rs 6 cr (Pollard) respectively and Rs 42 cr will be deducted from the purse. However, some franchises have followed a different policy. (2/8)
Talk about innovating and making most of the rules. There are franchises who don't mind if money is blocked from their salary purse before going into the auction because they can still save money if they can come to an arrangement with players. (3/8)
In the case of Delhi Capitals, Rishabh Pant has been paid Rs 16 cr, Axar Patel has been paid Rs 9 cr (but Rs 12 cr will be deducted from purse), Prithvi Shaw gets Rs 7.5 cr (Rs 8 cr will be deducted) and Anrich Nortje will get Rs 6.5 cr (Rs 6 cr will be deducted). (4/8)
This is a result of an agreement between franchise and player and the logic is this: Even if a franchise finds more money blocked from spending at auction than what they're paying the players, they will end up saving that money backend. (5/8)
The BCCI did this to encourage more franchises to release as many players as possible in the auction so that they could build a more robust auction pool. It was like dangling a carrot, bearing in mind that there should be enough talent in the auction pool. (6/8)
The negative to this is they can't spend this money at the auction. It's a good use of the rules for franchises to save money but at the same time it's a risk. I'm sure each franchise must've weighed these pros and cons. (7/8)
New franchises that are coming in are also free to get into such arrangements. However, there's a fear lurking for the new teams because they can't afford to 'negotiate' with star players who'll say "We might as well head into auction". They can't afford to take that risk. (Ends)
Correction: for Nortje 6.5 crore will be deducted. The higher amount between the slab and the actual salary paid is deducted. That's why Delhi will have a budget of Rs47.5 cr and not 48.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The more I listen to discussions around Ajinkya Rahane ahead of the Wankhede Test, the more I realize these discussions eventually boil down to just two questions:
* Will Ajinkya Rahane play?
* Should Ajinkya Rahane play?
So, here’s a #thread on the man… (1/25)
Let’s deal with the first question: Will Ajinkya Rahane play? -->> I don’t see him in the XI.
Reason? 1) Virat is back; 2) Shreyas can’t be dropped; 3) Shubhman did well; 4) Mayank can’t be forced to make way for a makeshift opener. (2/25)
Any other option? Make Rahane himself open? But is that a solution? Tomorrow, when Rohit and Rahul come back what happens? Anyways, this is stretching a bit too much. So, getting to the point... If Rahane has to play, decision will have to defy logic. (3/25)
So, retention lists are final & I didn't all names right. Mumbai Indians picked Suryakumar & not Ishan and I'm sure they have very good reasons for it. In this #thread let's look at what could've possibly made each franchise arrive at decisions they did. Just follow the thread.
Rohit, Boom & Pollard were in. Question was who's 4th. I thought Ishan provided 2 options -- batting & keeper. But MI made the difficult decision to go with Sky because he provides a solid base in middle order. Rohit at top, SKY in middle, Polly to finish, Boom to lead attack.
MI can now build their squad around these 4 trusted hands. They had to let go of Hardik -- their home grown talent -- and it must be hurting. So many successes. But again, Hardik has to work on his bowling and come back because that's what makes him special -- the allrounder tag.
Technically, deadline to submit list of retained players is around 8.30-9 pm. Who knows -- there could still be last-minute stitching of a deal?Once lists are submitted, there's a tv show scheduled at around 9.30 pm. (1/15)
But here's what I was generally thinking: Franchises who have worked for years on setting up their own robust ecosystems have to now suddenly let go of homegrown players. How unfair is that!
Mumbai Indians, for example, can choose only one betwn Hardik, Surya and Ishan. (2/15)
Look at Chennai Super Kings. Even for sake of posterity they can't hold back Faf du Plessis -- their MVP this yr. As much as they'd like to hold back Shardul Thakur, there's no space.
What does this all mean? Those years of investing in a good team amount to nothing? (3/15)
#Thread
Rahul Dravid will address his first press conference as India coach on Wednesday from Jaipur, venue for first T20 vs New Zealand. Down south, VVS Laxman is getting ready to take charge as National Cricket Academy (NCA) director. Beginning of a fresh, new journey! (1/25)
Both are former India teammates, have been batting legends, and unsurprisingly, when you hear these two names in the same sentence, the first memory they evoke is of that famous partnership in Kolkata 20 years ago -- the historic 2001 Test vs Australia at the Eden Gardens. (2/25)
I have my own little story about that Test series. Funny, embarrassing, awe-inspiring, unbelievable. India lost the first Test in Mumbai inside three days & like most others, I thought we would suffer the same fate in Kolkata too. The Australians looked unstoppable. (3/25)
Hello people. Thanks to Ramiz Raja’s statement on PCB planning #women’s #T20 league in PSL, it got me thinking if the idea is a possibility in #IPL. Remember, all this talk of a league makes no sense if it can’t financially sustain. Here’s a #Thread on the subject... (1/25)
Can there be an IPL for women in the near future? Will there be enough following? Can it financially sustain? Can a revenue-stream be created? Does women’s cricket have a story to tell? Has any model been given a thought? So many questions, but few answers. (2/25)
It’s a matter that keeps getting debated on and off, and why BCCI hasn’t done much about it yet. But for now, let’s leave BCCI out of this – they have enough to do already. Let’s independently try and understand this space. Remember – feedback is welcome. (3/25)