The most common assumption I read currently in oil analysis is the view that production growth absolutely must come from somewhere soon, to serve demand growth that's coming next year. This assumption is often paired with the view that western oil producers are making.... 1/
...a kind of policy mistake in their cautious reluctance to return to growth-oriented drilling. I'm on the other side of both assumptions. Indeed, I think western oil companies see--and have seen for some time--a very serious risk that total global oil demand.... 2/
...will not grow much or at all, in the years ahead. Why the divergence? Why do politically minded people and oil and gas fund managers have such a different view than oil companies themselves? I could speculate. But suffice to say, the no-growth risk has been mounting... 3/
...for years. It began with a big pivot from BP, two+ years ago, when they realized that hardly any growth existed in global oil after 2025. IEA has declared global road fuel has peaked. And as we know, global sales of ICE vehicles peaked 4 years ago. But aside.... 4/
...from these rather top level macro thematics, here is a more real-time, empirical framing that may help to understand what comes next in global oil demand: OECD vs Non-OECD growth. In this week's newsletter, I explained that for many years now, global oil demand growth....5/
...has relied on two enduring factors: 1. That Non-OECD demand grows nicely, and 2. that OECD demand, which peaked 15 years ago, remains steady. That worked for a while. Now it does not appear it's going to work as well. 6/
The wrinkle showing up now is that OECD demand appears on course to either fall, or not recover as much. That makes sense for a whole host of reasons. If this plays out as agencies such as EIA and IEA expect, and if the current weakness continues, then total global oil... 7/
...demand suddenly becomes more acutely dependent on the following hope: that Non-OECD demand growth outruns declines in OECD demand. Perhaps that happens. Perhaps it happens for brief periods of time. But we should at least understand the import this places on the marginal... 8/
...barrel, and those responsible for producing it. How eager would you be to *really go for it* and produce all out, given these conditions? We have to at least consider that western oil companies are not making a mistake. /fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gregor Macdonald

Gregor Macdonald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GregorMacdonald

12 Oct
Let's play the superlative game: the biggest story in global climate is unfolding in real time right now in China's EV market which is absolutely off the hook. EV (NEV) sales are headed towards 3 million this year, as ICE sales get absolutely crushed. 1/
In my latest newsletter I showed that after ICE sales peaked at 28.1 million units in 2017, China's road fuel demand stopped growing. While we can't count on fuel demand to stay flat (on-road ICE fleet in China is mighty) ICE sales are on course to be < 22 million this year. 2/
Kinda fascinating is that China's data agencies have started reporting electricity demand from the emerging EV fleet. Counter to people's intuitions, it's not much. But it's not nothing. 3 million EV hitting the road in 2021 places roughly 10 TWh of new demand on the grid. 3/
Read 10 tweets
31 Jan
1/ I'm moderately concerned the Reddit Army, should it decide to choose $SLV as its next short squeeze target, may wind up causing some near term disruption to the global PV market. To be sure, global PV manufacturers are what's known as 'commercials' and as such, they...
2/ ...routinely hedge their silver exposure, just as an industrial concern hedges their future expected need for all manner of inputs, from oil to industrial metals. That's why I'm only moderately concerned. However, the chatter on WSB is very much about wanting to disrupt...
3... the physical market, by pushing the futures market into extreme territory. My general guess is the Reddit Army will find it far more challenging to disrupt the silver market. Unless of course we see a repeat, as we did last week, when much larger players got involved.
Read 14 tweets
17 Oct 20
Democrats currently have a single issue offered to them on a silver platter, against which Republicans are defenseless, one that would catalyze majority buy-in on the need to expand not just SCOTUS but other federal courts, and one that is clearly most pressing: Voting. 1/
Nothing is going to happen without voting modernization and liberalization. No climate policy, no health care, no gun control. Everything is downstream of voting. And it's obvious the @GOP has already made voting their own number one issue: that is, voting suppression. 2/
Perhaps there isn't clarity on how obvious this is, how voting should be the Democratic party's spearhead, because leadership is endlessly lost in the "complexity" of all the things voters and the party cares about. Look at the time wasted already on court expansion... 3/
Read 6 tweets
13 Sep 20
Chatter suddenly rising of inflation risk maps almost perfectly to this same juncture during the great recession. After the Fed showed it could put a floor under asset prices, the trumpets sounded. But, it didn't happen then, and isn't going to happen this time either. $SPY $TLT
The apex of inflation chatter will likely hit next year, when Green New Deal policies edge closer to reality. But it will just be Lucy and the Football all over again, because $GND (at least in energy-infrastructure terms) is ultimately deflationary, wringing out costs, waste.
Imagine looking back on us from the year 2120, and realizing "those people" seriously believed that investing in cheaper, faster, better, lower-cost infrastructure was both a bad investment, and...wait for it...inflationary. Can't make it up.
Read 8 tweets
20 Apr 20
Over the past two years I've been telling the story of how global oil demand growth would eventually flatten, decimating the industry. Today's oil gotterdammerung is a very different story; a macro crisis that will not as many hope deliver easy progress to the climate problem. 1/
To be sure, the massive revisions to 2020 global oil demand, if realized, will stand as a deep crater. And it'll take years for oil to slowly crawl out back to the rim. We might cautiously conclude the crisis has therefore brought the peak of demand forward, from 2025 to 2019. 2/
So in the first instance, we can pretty safely conclude that the long arc of oil's demand growth, from the first half the 20thC to the early part of the 21st, is over. It was ending anyway. For all the various reasons I and others have been writing about for years. 3/
Read 20 tweets
1 Jan 20
Over the holidays I rode around Portland on a borrowed e-bike while writing up this story for the Atlantic's @RouteFifty. One conclusion: the impact on the short-trip end of the transport spectrum could, in these early days, be comparable to EV. routefifty.com/infrastructure…
2/ If you've not yet ridden an e-bike the effects are simple enough to describe: imagine a quiet motor kicking in every time your cadence slows. You are still very much riding a bike, still pedaling. Over at @iamspecialized they say "it's you, only faster" and that sums it up.
3/Sales of e-bikes, by one estimate are on pace to rise 50% in the US this year, coming from a low base. In Europe, however, there is a more startling metric: 2018 e-bike sales were 10X EV sales. I mean, that is a full-on viking raid into the short-trips typically taken by cars.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(