RTing this given Steve Baker's speech in the Commons today and the outcry over the reintroduction of minor measures like partial mask mandates. People like Steve are a key reason why we are here, facing yet another new variant and all the risks and costs that entails.
(1/12)
He's raging about steps being taken to counter a calamity that he and his colleagues in govt were instrumental in creating. The way to have protected everyone and everything he claims to hold dear, including children's education, was to control the pandemic.
(2/12)
The costs now are much higher, whether you try to control things or not (much higher if not). You can always say, like he and many others do, 'you can't keep implementing restrictions each time there's a new variant', or 'look at the impact on children & businesses.'
(3/12)
This treats the issue as one of will and attitude, disregarding the fact that there is a viral infection that doesn't give a hoot about what you think. It takes the stance of choosing to harm vs not harm, but the harm being considered is to your beliefs, not to people.
(4/12)
So, masks in schools is harming kids, not having masks is protecting them from harm, only in this twisted perspective in which you either refuse to believe or don't care if kids get COVID.
(5/12)
It also completes leaves out the fact that the reason we're having to do any of this, is because our govt has got us to this point.
The decisions are more urgent and the costs higher but are determined to repeat the same mistakes as before.
(6/12)
Given what's happening for Omicron, it looks like a lot of the hospitality sector may be hit by cancelled bookings and incur major losses. This sucks and is really awful for the people who will be affected.
(7/12)
And this will be blamed on the 'COVID-phobics' and 'lockdowners' who have zero power to do anything, instead of the govt that knowingly put these businesses and people's livelihoods at risk by failing to control the pandemic and failing to support people through it.
(8/12)
By deliberately choosing to do as little as possible to look after its people, the govt achieved precisely this. (if you are going to say they did X, Y, Z, a govt doesn't get a sticker for doing something, they don't get a participation prize).
(9/12)
And also whatever they spent on the general population was dwarfed by what they gave to their friends.

What's really depressing is that this show of concern, this talk of values and freedoms, it's all empty nonsense. It is talk about caring with no care in it.
(10/12)
And its not about not getting it.
This is part of a deliberate and concerted push for herd immunity and a minimally interventionist approach,
(11/12)
Steve Baker talks about children missing nativity plays and how terrible this would be. I have my doubts about this but even without that, I don't it really compares to losing a parent, a grandparent or big chunks of your childhood to Long COVID.
(12/12)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hisham Ziauddeen

Hisham Ziauddeen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HZiauddeen

28 Nov
🧵 COVID-19 & human capital: what we have lost and continue to lose

This is elaborating on the last bit of the 🧵below. If the devastating numbers of lives lost and damaged don't move you enough, perhaps the practical and economic arguments might?
(1/25)
A pervasive belief in many political and capitalistic systems is that human capital is just something to be slotted into necessary points in the system & that workers are interchangeable, replaceable & in plentiful supply 'we can just get/take more from elsewhere'.
(2/25)
I emphasise that this is a belief as any vaguely sensible model will make clear that this is not a feasible reality in any sustainable way (depends of course on what you are trying to sustain). But it is a belief that pervades a lot of thinking, especially in politics.
(3/25)
Read 25 tweets
28 Nov
🧵 COVID-19 Omicron: it's worrying because it's expected, as are the reactions to it

About: 'you're scaremongering', 'wait for more information', 'it's the bloody COVID panic-mongers'

TL; DR: FFS just look at everything we've seen and learnt over the last 20 months!
(1/30)
As we approach the 2nd birthday of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is surprising how the stark biological reality of SARS-CoV-2 remains somehow a matter of contention. Well, not very surprising because that's what mis- and disinformation have actively been doing.
(2/30)
At the core of this biological reality is this:
SARS-CoV-2 IS A VIRUS.
Therefore it does not, and cannot, know or care about what you think about it, about how it should behave, and whatever hubristic attitude you adopt towards it.
(3/30)
Read 31 tweets
26 Nov
🧵 COVID-19 & B.1.1.529: a chance for govt & others to change their mind and their approach?

While we are still gathering data on B.1.1.529, the early indicators are very very alarming- likely far more transmissible and more serious than delta + more vaccine escape.
(1/10)
I'm not going to repeat the reasons why we are here or talk about what we could have done.
Instead, I'd like to suggest that this could be an opportunity to extricate the UK from the disastrous path it has been committed to for several months.
(2/10)
In the 🧵below I talked about how many of the architects and supporters of our pandemic strategy are essentially playing by the playbook of politics: never admit mistakes, double down when challenged, pursue the position relentlessly.
(3/10)
Read 10 tweets
21 Nov
🧵 COVID-19: The playbook of politics

Mainly UK-centric but elements will apply to other countries as well
As the pandemic has continued to progress as expected, one wonders what exactly is being managed by our pandemic management strategies.
(1/30)
The UK strategy is certainly not managing case numbers (currently ~40,000/day), deaths (~150/day), or health service capacity (overwhelmed +++). As for #LongCovid...
(2/30)

If not these key outcomes, what else could the UK strategy be managing?
Our expectations?

'People of Britain! For too long have you expected your govt to protect you from dying of preventable infections. No more! It is time to take responsibility for yourselves!'
(3/30)
Read 30 tweets
31 Oct
🧵 The unspeakable horror of JCVI's strategy:

So I asked this last night and many people rightfully pointed out that one does not need to have children to care about them. This is completely true and profuse apologies to those who were impugned by it.

Some elaboration:
(1/11)
I asked the question given the unspeakable horror of the course they decided to take. While we have known from what has happened that they have been following a strategy of herd immunity through mass infection of infection, it is sickening to see it in writing.
(2/11)
For a good summary of the minutes, see below. For me the key points are: they simultaneously hold that children are at low risk and do not transmit, and that infected children would serve as boosters for adults and help control the pandemic.
(3/11)
Read 11 tweets
30 Oct
🧵COVID-19 and how a minority who hold power have endangered the world:

This isn't the only situation in which this minority have done this (see climate catastrophe) but I'm just talking about controlling the pandemic here or to be precise our inability to do so.
(1/8)
At the very outset, a global pandemic should have had a concerted and coordinated global response i.e. novel virus, serious acute illness, let's play it safe and suppress. Instead, you know what happened.
(2/8)
Over the last several months, we've seen what has happened when countries that had successfully managed their pandemic (Vietnam, Singapore) tried reopening. Cases & deaths started to rise again. Because once you open up travel you'll start bringing in cases again.
(3/8)
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(