🧵COVID-19 and how a minority who hold power have endangered the world:

This isn't the only situation in which this minority have done this (see climate catastrophe) but I'm just talking about controlling the pandemic here or to be precise our inability to do so.
(1/8)
At the very outset, a global pandemic should have had a concerted and coordinated global response i.e. novel virus, serious acute illness, let's play it safe and suppress. Instead, you know what happened.
(2/8)
Over the last several months, we've seen what has happened when countries that had successfully managed their pandemic (Vietnam, Singapore) tried reopening. Cases & deaths started to rise again. Because once you open up travel you'll start bringing in cases again.
(3/8)
Because the world and the global economy are so connected, it is not possible to maintain isolation indefinitely. The longer the pandemic goes on, the harder it gets to do this without suppression & ultimately most countries will be pushed into some form of 'living with it'
(4/8)
Those who have controlled their national pandemics are at the mercy of and at risk from those who have not. These latter countries like the UK, have ongoing high case numbers but have also imported and 'improved on' new variants that are more virulent and transmissable.
(5/8)
Also their laissez-faire attitude to deaths and illness and their pretending that things are normal, make it harder for other countries to continue to argue for cautions and precautions 'Look the UK is getting back to normal!'
(6/8)
The longer this goes on, the harder it will become to control local pandemics as well the global pandemic. Those who did not control their local pandemics will push everyone into more protracted suffering. And the architects of all th have played their cards well.
(7/8)
They have built and infiltrated the systems of power to engineer all this and it is only they who will profit from this. The rest of us will just have to suffer.
(8/8)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hisham Ziauddeen

Hisham Ziauddeen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HZiauddeen

31 Oct
🧵 The unspeakable horror of JCVI's strategy:

So I asked this last night and many people rightfully pointed out that one does not need to have children to care about them. This is completely true and profuse apologies to those who were impugned by it.

Some elaboration:
(1/11)
I asked the question given the unspeakable horror of the course they decided to take. While we have known from what has happened that they have been following a strategy of herd immunity through mass infection of infection, it is sickening to see it in writing.
(2/11)
For a good summary of the minutes, see below. For me the key points are: they simultaneously hold that children are at low risk and do not transmit, and that infected children would serve as boosters for adults and help control the pandemic.
(3/11)
Read 11 tweets
30 Oct
🧵 LongCOVID and post-COVID sequelae:
Minimisation now sets up minimisation later

About how these are being minimised right now & for the future, with reference to the JCVI plan to deliberately infect children to control the UK pandemic and serve as boosters for adults

(1/18)
This isn't going to be a summary of the research so far on this area. We now have more than enough evidence* that COVID is associated with a risk for ongoing ill health as well as for future ill-health.

*enough to know that you would much rather not have it.
(2/18)
It is now clear that LongCOVID alone can be a very severe and debilitating illness. However LongCOVID most likely represents the more severe end of early post COVID sequelae.

*enough to know that you would much rather not have it.
(3/18)
Read 19 tweets
30 Oct
🧵 Bullying and cyberbullying: feeling compelled to defend yourself

When bullies impugn your character, this for many people is the red line 'I cannot let this pass, I can't let them get away with this'.
Unfortunately this is a very common tactic employed by bullies.
(1/18)
A lot of this thread is not unique to this kind of bullying but I'll use it as the main example.

The bully attacks, and attacks, and recruits other people into the attack. Bullies can work in networks that are coordinated to varying degrees.
(2/18)
They also 'recruit' other people into the bullying in less active forms such as exclusion and isolation. Raising questions about the character of the victim is a powerful means of doing this because this elicits very strong reactions as well a kind of obscene curiousity.
(3/18)
Read 19 tweets
26 Oct
Systematised and casual misogyny: a 🧵 for men

If you have not heard it, I highly recommend listening to this fantastic interview performance from @dgurdasani1, both for the clear communication of information and risks and for calling out the misogyny is real time.
(1/21)
She doesn't call it out as misogyny in the interview. She just calls out, names and challenges the inappropriate treatment she receives.
That inappropriate treatment is misogyny and she calls it out in this tweet. And very rightly.
(2/21)
When women call out misogyny, the most typical male response (and to some extent, the female response) is outrage, 'how dare she accuse me of misogyny?'.

This is based on a very literal and incorrect view of misogyny based on intentionality 'you're saying I hate women!'.
(3/21)
Read 21 tweets
24 Oct
🧵 Scarcity, systems and people:

This was the 🧵I had planned for this weekend. It started out with mental health systems but then got a bit into COVID as well.

It's about how scarcity shapes, and is used to shape, systems and the people within them.
(1/50)
I'm going to start with mental health services (MHS), partly because they will always be closer to heart, but also because it'll help illustrate the various levels this operates at. It'll take a bit of unpacking so please bear with me.
(2/50)
A couple of points upfront:
1. Scarcity has to be thought about as both an in-the-moment & a long-term factor i.e. it shapes systems and people over the longer term and has accumulated effects that interact with the in-the-moment scarcity.
(3/50)
Read 51 tweets
23 Oct
🧵About these tweets by Phil Magness: why is he talking about lockdowns?

TL; DR: Assume there's a purpose.

Earlier today, Phil QTed a poor article he wrote this week last year about the 'strawman' of lockdown and followed it up with a list of the people in the article.
(1/24)
I was a bit surprised to find myself on this list along with these big shots @gregggonsalves @dgurdasani1 @gorskon @BillHanage @CT_Bergstrom @GidMK @angie_rasmussen.
Finally! A very weird sort of recognition!
Then I realised I had been in the original article.
(2/24)
Why retweet this now? I get it's about a year to the date but you only usually mark the anniversaries of things that are significant or good.
The article is on the website of AIER, which is closely linked with the GBD, and are pro-herd immunity & increasingly anti-vax.
(3/24)
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(