Tomorrow I have an appeal stage 3 hearing to challenge the initial decision of the General Manager that she did not agree a recent absence constituted 'work related stress'. I cited pressure to agree to the jab. #MandatoryVaccination 1/
My GP signed me off for 'work related stress' and Occupational Health agreed it was.
I cited relentless emails to agree to the jab, containing emotional blackmail & false claims like "getting vaccinated is the best way to protect yourself & those around you". 2/
The only reason the GM gave for not agreeing my stress was work related was "it (mandatory jabs) is not a current NHS policy". My absence was during the summer, before it had been confirmed (subject to parliamentary procedure).
Her rationale falls down in 2 fundamental ways. 3/
1. If she is going by what policy was at the time of the absence, then being pressured to agree to a jab should constitute harassment, according to NHS definition which reads "(pressure to do) anything which a person is not obliged to do"
4/
2. If an appeal however, is supposed to be informed by fresh information, then it is no longer an argument to say mandatory jabs are not current policy, since the Chief Exec has sent the email warning staff of the dates they need to be jabbed by.
So it's no longer true. 5/
But actually all of that should be moot since my initial claim of work related stress mentioned nothing about it being a "current policy", my stress came from the threat of a confirmed near future policy which would seriously risk my health or livelihood, with no good reason. 6/
On top of that I will deconstruct their false claims of covid injection safety, efficacy & necessity.
My case is water tight, but ultimately the Gen Managers only directive is to deny liability. If the NHS admit pressure to be jabbed is unjustified & unlawful, its open season. 7/
So I do not expect to win..but I will try to enjoy forcing them to confront the contradictions and lies within their organisation and what they are allowing the govt to use them to do. I want to hold a mirror.
An RCN union rep is coming tho I don't think he's interested 8/
If he flakes, I'll leave RCN and focus on my WoE membership if the mandate does get voted thru. I will need to be even more prepared for that. This is just a warm up.
I'll post an account of the meeting tomorrow afternoon. 9/
The fight against fascism is a bedrock of the left but during Covid our collectivist principles were misappropriated by a nefarious Tory govt which used this 'crisis' to crack down on civil liberties & line pockets of big pharma lobbyists 1/
The govt cultivated an illusion of incompetence, which scared the public into supporting indefinitely extended, ever increasing social controls in the face of apparent govt inaction. It’s much easier to turn the screw when the people are asking for it. 2/
'Leaks’ of unbelievable remarks such as “let the bodies pile high” were surely theatre, designed to scare us into supporting mask mandates, ruinous lockdowns & poorly tested injections from companies like Pfizer, who were fined $4.3bn for lies about their medications. 3/
Care staff are due to be given their marching orders today. Most unions have been useless. If you or anyone you know has resisted this far & are wondering what to do next, this thread will give a few pointers. #Nojabnojob#vaccinemandate 1/
Start by joining the Workers of England Union. @WofEUnion have been the most explicitly anti-mandate union in the country. They have already helped many care staff challenge this mandate. We will soon learn if they have been successful, but they have some great advice. 2/
Solicitors firm @pjhlaw have provided a template letter you can send to an employer that puts them on notice and goes thru various legal mechanisms which they can be challenged on. They also have a letter regarding school jabs. Scroll down this page - pjhlaw.co.uk/no-jab-no-job-… 3/
I've been challenging the Executive of my NHS Trust for over a year with regular questions submitted to a live Q&A, which is archived publicly on YouTube
The Chief Exec has dodged some key questions, but has given revealing answers to others... 1/
When asked if he'd challenged the govts arbitrary decision to give the 2nd dose 12 weeks following the 1st, rather than 3 weeks (which trial safety & efficacy data was predicated on) he said he had, very strongly, but was told by govt "that's just how it's going to be" 2/
When asked if he agreed with a jab mandate, he said he did not, and that it was "right" that people should have a choice. But that he would implement the mandate when the govt ordered him to. #JustDoingMyJob #NoJabNoJob 3/