I had to seek Court intervention. The Courts ruled that Railway Board acted against me for the malafide purpose of scuttling the review.
An Expert Committee appointed on orders of Delhi HC said that ongoing construction should be scrapped and my alignment..2/6
... should be adopted to start construction afresh. But, Rly Board refused to accept the unanimous recommendations of the committee.
Today, not just the Kashmir Rail Link Project but all 7 projects in Himalayas are in a deep mess because of the flawed alignment methodology..3/6
.. propagated by Rly Bd.
So much for respect for merit and profession excellence in Governments in India. I am sure my experience is not unique. Many have experienced the futility of striving for professional excellence in India.
You can read about IR's fiasco in Himalayas..4/6
..in the link below:
Below you will also find link to my post how the flawed alignment methodology of Rly Board continues to have its toll. The latest examples are the plans to build the rail link to..5/6
..Semi-highspeed line in Kerala is the most glaring example. Here Rly Board has accorded In-principle Approval without any surveys of ground conditions & forecast of ridership. You can read about this in the link below:
Is it a mere coincidence that the Chief Engineer who came with his team to discuss with me the plan and alignment for the rail link to Leh was soon transferred out of the project and Northern Railway.
Second Update (9:30 on 02/12/21)
For those wanting to know how the scuttling happened and how this flawed methodology spread to do many projects, you could read these three:
Scan copies of my 5-page letter dated 19.7.2016 to the Hon'ble Prime Minister about the new line projects of Indian Railway in the Himalayas:...
1/3
... 2/3
... 3/3
Fourth Update 18:35 on 02/12/21
While Rly Board was determined to suppress & silence me, I consistently received direct and indirect support from CAT, Delhi High Court (multiple times), the CAG, the CVC, the PAC & both the Expert Committees, 1st in 2008-09 & 2nd in 2014-15..1/2
..When I submitted the proposal in 2007-08, several officers including Member Engineering strongly supported me.
You can read a brief chronological account in my older post in the link below:. 2/2
..Despite so many top statuary authorities of the country speaking against Rly Board's handling of these important projects, Rly Board's obduracy has prevailed so far despite recent egregious failures in the plans for the Leh Ladakh line, Char Dham lines & Kerala Highspeed line.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
K-Rail and Railway Board's history of approving projects without proper ground surveys & feasibility studies
With Railway Board still dragging its feet about rescinding the In-principle Approval for the K-Rail plan, it is necessary to ask why Railway Board refuses to learn..
.. lessons from its fiasco in Himalayas where since 1997, Rly Bd approved alignments for as many as eight new line projects in the challenging landslide-prone terrain without any ground surveys, on just paper alignments.
My post in the link above contains a detailed account....
..The latest victims of this approach are the plan for the semi-highspeed line in Kerala & the strategically important Bilaspur-Manali-Leh line.
K-RAIL: WHY HAS RAILWAY BOARD NOT TAKEN ANY ACTION AGAINST MD/KRDCL FOR SUBMITTING FEASIBILITY REPORT BASED ON GOOGLE EARTH AND NO SURVEYS OF GROUND CONDITIONS & RIDERDHIP & DECIDING TO ADOPT STANDARD GAUGE?
..approvals in future also to projects involving this magnitude of public expenditure based on such fraudulent, concocted & cooked up feasibility reports?
.. 2/3
My plan for upgradation and expansion of the Indian Railway network:
1. Build about 15,000 km of 200-250 kmph lines to cover the GQ and it's diagonals & link other major cities. About half of this will be by upgrading the existing lines and half as new lines. Total estimated..
...cost: About INR 5.0 lakh crore over a period of 7 to 10 yrs.
2. No more DFCs. Complete the ongoing Eastern and Western DFCs and use them (with some modifications) for carrying freight & slow passenger trains.
3. Drop all ongoing surveys and feasibility studies to build..
... Bullet Train lines. India does not need and will not be able to afford Bullet Train lines for at least next 15 yrs, by when improved technologies like Maglev are likely to be available for speed more than 250 kmph.
In the coming days, resolve of the Government of India and Railway Board to upgrade India's rly system to high speed (160-250 kmph) will be tested. Powerful foreign lobbies, which represent the interests of the manufacturers of airplanes and automobiles and the oil companies,....
... have been trying to cripple the railways in India by preventing it from raising speed and line capacity. Their first success came in 2004-06, when the Govt decided to build the Eastern and Western Dedicated Freight Corridors instead of a 200-250 kmph line which would have...
.... benifited both the passenger and freight transport (both DFCs and 200-250 kmph lines cost the same). Their next success came in 2017, when the Government decided to build the Ahmedabad-Mumbai Bullet Train line instead of the much cheaper and better option of 200-250 kmph..