SPEAKING OUT ON CLIMATE FINANCE.
Thanks to @TheIndiaForum. One of the fallouts of the coal "tamasha" at the closing plenary was to divert attention from the developed country failure on climate finance and loss and damage assistance. @moefcc @3rdworldnetwork @JMauskar 1/n
Deliberate, at least in part. @AlokSharma_RDG saying that the world will call India to account is a bit rich. By COP27 the South will be calling the developed world to account yet again -- louder at Sharm-el-Sheikh than at Glasgow!! 2/n
I underline the unprecedented COP decision that "notes with deep regret" the failure to mobilise the promised USD 100 billion. Failure on loss and damage finance. Obdurate and recalcitrant attitude of developed countries on finance called out. 3/n
I point out that asking for climate finance from public sources is not for "ideological" reasons as opposed to pragmatism. Private equity seeks profit and is not answerable to needs. De-risking simply means ensuring that private sector gets its returns. 4/n
Private climate finance will inaugurate a new cycle of "green" debt. How is that any advance? I clarify the persistent (and deliberate?) confusion among some that India's call for USD 1 trillion was a demand for India. It was not, as is obvious from the record. 5/n
This is not to take away from some hard fought battles that developing countries, including India, won at COP26. Among these: A structured work programme on the New Collective Quantified Goal, that will come back with recommendations by 2024. 6/n
The Standing Committee on Finance will also work towards "definitions" of climate finance. An important fight here that will continue. 7/n
Keeping the long-term finance issue under the Convention on the agenda till the year 2027, while developed countries wanted to terminate it at COP26. Call to double adaptation funding above 2019 levels by 2025 -- meagre but some acknowledgement. 8/n
The basic fault lines though remain. The battle will continue because the current equilibrium is unsustainable. It neither provides the means of implementation to the Global South nor are the developed countries on track to doing anywhere near enough. See you at COP27!! 9/n

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with T. Jayaraman

T. Jayaraman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tjayaraman

4 Dec
Excellent review of #COP26. Sees through the illusion of US as climate leader. Very understanding of India's position. An excellent,nuanced, parsing of the coal para in the decision and the goings on of the plenary.
Highlights India's role, close to my own personal reading.
Notes the importance of PM Modi's early announcements and the eloquent articulation of India's Env Minister @byadavbjp at the closing plenary of the equity dimension and why developing countries still need fossil fuels.
Read 8 tweets
3 Dec
@JacquelynGill Your comment and @_HannahRitchie piece very true. India was very concerned at this trend being stoked by IPCC itself in WG I report. SPM highlights very low probability, high impact events from RCP8.5 scenarios.
However some developed countries were evangelically insistent on including this stuff. We pushed back but the language was heavily backed by the IPCC leadership. The matter is on record in the @IISD_ENB account if proceedings.
India also referred to it in closing remarks in plenary. Other pressure was building on IPCC before the approval. Example - Naomi Oreskes and Nicholas Stern claiming IPCC was being conservative on sea level rise in a major news article.
Read 7 tweets
27 Nov
EXTRAORDINARY PUSHBACK BY INDIA ON COP26 PRESSURE TACTICS -- PM Modi refers to attempts to hijack the climate agenda by the "colonial mindset". @bforboseman @nit_set @n_thanki @chilledasad100 @JMauskar @KevinClimate @doreenstabinsky @TheBTI @vijramachandran @3rdworldnetwork
See video available at (regrettably only in Hindi without translation) - from 1:09:00 to 1:16:00 -significant even for the length of the intervention on the importance of development for India.
The speech notes that the developed world has emitted about 15 times more than India in absolute and per capita cumulative emissions (from 1850 till today). Also notes that US + EU have emitted 11 times more in absolute cumulative and 20 more in per capita cumulative emissions.
Read 12 tweets
22 Nov
WHAT HAPPENED AT COP26? ASSESSMENTS AND REFLECTIONS -- FULL TALK NOW AVAILABLE ON THE MSSRF YOUTUBE CHANNEL.

Also from the MSSRF website at
mssrf.org/content/what-h…
1/n
Some highlights from the talk:
COP26 was India's COP in 3 important ways. First, PM Modi's announcements at the start that reassured the world. And laid a challenge before the developed world to match the mitigation ambition of developing countries with ambition in finance. 2/n
Second, India was a key player in finalising the Paris Rulebook in a spirit of compromise while providing full support to the fight of colleagues of G77+China on adaptation and loss and damage. 3/n
Read 14 tweets
19 Nov
CATCHING A NARRATIVE IN THE MAKING.
First step -- Glasgow becomes a third person actor extraneous to countries. Glasgow decided, Glasgow's success... @JMauskar @bforboseman @3rdworldnetwork @Ninad_India @KanitkarT @n_thanki #COP26
thehindu.com/opinion/lead/t…
Glasgow was necessary...Glasgow strengthened the Paris Agreement mechanism...."Glasgow clarified the ‘ambition cycle’, and this appears to have had results in the form of enhanced pledges." What??
How does this trick work? One, confuse two separate stages -- before the meeting and what the meeting decided. Before the meeting, the UK Presidency, US and EU went around "persuading". Global media campaign, etc. Glasgow had nothing to do with it!! Countries provide pledges.
Read 9 tweets
19 Nov
Bunch of Annex-I scientists patting themselves on the back (@JoeriRogelj , @Knutti_ETH , @BardLahn, @JolenecookC ) for carbon budget in climate policy in the Glasgow decision ~CMA.3. Time to throw some history their way! @JMauskar @bforboseman @HarryWinkler @KanitkarT 1/n
By 2010, @KanitkarT and I were aware of carbon budgets and their importance for burden sharing in mitigation. We had a conference on the subject - Global Carbon Budgets and Equity in Climate Change attended by the Minister at that time, Jairam Ramesh. @JMauskar was there too. 3/n
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(