Having listened to the oral testimony from the US Supreme Court hearing Mississippi abortion law case…there are signs Roe vs Wade (1973 landmark ruling which secured women’s rights to abortions in USA) is about to fall.
(1/9
➡️Justice Brett Kavanaugh: “The Constitution is neither pro-life nor pro-choice ... and leaves the issue to the people to resolve in the democratic process,"
(2/9
He also asked “If we think that the prior precedents are seriously wrong”, does it not indicate “that the right answer is actually a return to the position of neutrality?”
(3/9
➡️Chief Justice Roberts: questioned why 15 weeks was"not enough time" for a woman to obtain abortion procedure
(4/9
➡️Justice Ms Coney-Barrett asked why placing babies up for adoption wasn’t an alternative to abortion
(5/9
➡️Justice Alito likened Roe to Plessy v. Ferguson, the 1896 case affirming the constitutionality of racial segregation, saying: “Would it not be sufficient to say that was an egregiously wrong decision on the day it was handed down and now it should be overruled?”
(6/9
➡️Justice Neil Gorsuch questioned whether it was even possible to craft a coherent, workable legal standard if court sought only to narrow constitutional protections for abortion incrementally. Thus indicating an overruling of Roe was only way to affirm the Mississippi ban.
(7/9
👉 If Roe goes, then it’ll be up to the US states to decide for themselves once again to set abortion laws.
If the lines of questioning from the conservative Supremes are anything to go by, Roe is in trouble.
(8/9
For restricted abortion bans before 23 weeks, this has become the ‘viability standard’.
The 6-3 conservative Supreme Court could decide to pair that back to 15 weeks, upholding the Mississippi law. Or they could use this as an opportunity to overturn Roe outright.
(9/9
12 US states have 'trigger laws' set to immediately ban abortions should Roe fall.
Others would likely quickly follow across America.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How can a Scottish Government young persons health and well-being survey be controversial?
Let’s find out…
(1/13
➡️ the idea behind it
School pupils in S4 to S6 will be asked to give their views on a range of subjects.
These subjects cover the full spread of topics you’d expect. From physical and mental health to bullying and the pressures of school work.
So far so good.
(2/13
At this point I doubt anyone would dispute the value of conducting such a survey. It’s good to know more about the health and well-being of school pupils.
But what happens if the survey asks school kids about their sex lives?
(3/13
A thread (which I take absolutely no joy writing) exploring why I worry Labour at UK level still has a long way to go & also still doesn’t get why many millions of voters felt alienated from the party
Focusing on what Starmer’s Fabian pamphlet and latest reshuffle tells us
(1/12
Pondering over the Labour front bench reshuffle. It shows what Kier Starmer’s Fabian pamphlet suggested. He doesn’t get the culture cleavage in contemporary UK politics. In Fabians pamphlet he wrote about US style culture wars being ‘imported by Tories’.
(2/12
Not only is that worryingly complacent attitude, it means Labour leader is blind to very real threats to Labour’s electoral coalition.
(3/12
Listing a handful of some police investigations where the SNP’s name has come up.
These are either ongoing police investigations of the SNP as an organisation or elected SNP office holders. Or third parties with well documented relationships with the SNP.
(1/14
Short thread demonstrating how the SNP imposes cuts to Scottish education; with the Scottish 'Greens' defending it all.
Talking education attainment gap funding, and SNP sleight-of-hand alterations to resource distribution and how this directly targets the poorest pupils.
[1/10
➡️19 Jun 2021: '£215 million to improve attainment'
On 19 June 2021 on the Scottish Government's website they published plans boasting about £215m to improve the educational attainment gap.
Great news, something does need to be done about it.
[2/10
Part of this announcement was that 9 of the councils with the highest share of deprivation would share £43m of funding among themselves - called “Challenge Authorities” in the announcement.
[3/10