What does the "smart money" think of Omicron?

Always interesting to read what analysts with huge $$$ on the line (and with no incentive other than to make more $$) think. JP Morgan's take:

"Current data does not appear alarming as of this time" –>
"South African cases near the pandemic avg (49th %tile), and COVID fatalities near the bottom (4th %tile) – a fairly favorable situation relative to past 2 years (and sig better than the rest of the world where the cases are in the 64th, and deaths in the 17th percentile)." ->
"Despite Omicron being around for several weeks, a media blitz happened on Thanksgiving evening, one of the lowest points of market liquidity for the whole year, prompting a crash in various assets sensitive to global growth and recovery such as Oil." 🤔->
"A second blow to markets was delivered shortly after, also in the middle of night in the U.S. (Monday midnight), with the Moderna story - later largely invalidated."🤔

"Many clients have told us they are not worried about Omicron itself, but the reaction of governments."->
"Another source of confusion comes from assessments of Omicron’s transmissibility. Broadly circulated claims that the new variant is 500 times more infectious than Delta seem implausible. For instance, assume that R0 for Delta is 4, so Omicron would have an R0 of 2,000" 🤡->
"meaning 1 infected person results in 2,000 new infections? ...highly unlikely when on avg an individual has 16 daily contacts, and, by that math, the whole world would have been already infected in less than a week (i.e., 3 cycles would result in 2000^3= 8Bn infections). 🤡🤡->
"While it is likely that Omicron is more transmissible, early reports suggest it may also be less deadly – which would fit into the pattern of virus evolution observed historically."->
"(if) a less severe/more transmissible virus quickly crowds out more severe variants, could the Omicron variant be a catalyst to transform a deadly pandemic into something similar to seasonal flu? That would fit with historical patterns of previous respiratory virus pandemics"->
"if that scenario were to happen, instead of skipping two letters and naming it Omicron, the WHO could have skipped all the way to Omega."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with TNK 🙂

TNK 🙂 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TTBikeFit

13 Nov
Local micro-tyrant cry-bully alert🚨

Town council member (in RI) decries OpEd in local paper that questioned the firing of 3 teachers requesting jab exemption, by writing her own tyrannical screed:
“We value the science behind (vax), have adhered to masking and value our students’ safety... To understand how it could be look at FL, GA, TX community spread. Children out of school, communities paralyzed by virus, hospitals overrun because they rejected a simple solution.” 🤔
Not to let facts interfere, but whatever the “simple solution these states rejected” might be, there is no statistical difference in fatality rates between RI,FL,GA,TX.
Read 7 tweets
13 Oct
Sorry Sweden haters. Despite so many lockdown loons wishing Sweden the worst, it just didn’t turn out that way🇸🇪💪🏾. This despite getting hit hard early in the pandemic (a frequent excuse used by NYC apologists) and admittedly not protecting care homes initially.
More analysis by the creator of the "Gato year" himself boriquagato.substack.com/p/sweden-wins-…
Still more - from another actual Swede like Harold. …edevelopmentperestroika.wordpress.com/2021/10/12/swe…
Read 4 tweets
6 Oct
Psuedo “expert” Dr Jha of #RhodeIsland ‘s own Brown U expounds on masking. Whoops. But objective truth and data don’t matter in the post modern field of “Public Health”.
Yet the good “Dr” can charge big bucks to advise “business leaders” and “policy makers” on pandemic strategies. Perhaps he should see a therapist first? First “Tool”: Hide under your damn bed!
Read 5 tweets
27 Sep
“Don’t worry - just ignore the risk of crossing the minefield. What matters is what happens on the other side! You may even get a few months of benefit over there!”

It’s becoming painfully clear that there is in fact a minefield located just beyond dose 1. ->
To get to dose 1+x you must cross the minefield. Meaning you may be severely or mortally harmed on the way.

Now, we can argue how many mines are in the field and how likely you are to step on one.

But it is increasingly clear the minefield is real and it’s a threat. ->
And although Pfizer and Moderna ignored the minefield in their trials, we don’t get to in the real world.

Making it across the minefield seems to occur some weeks post dose 2. ->
Read 7 tweets
18 Sep
One of the best independent analysts out there - banned long ago by Twitter with no explanation - has his data unknowingly used by the FDA to support the case against boosters. boriquagato.substack.com/p/gato-goes-to… ->
Proof that an independent critical thinker-even if they are a cat- using analytical rigor untainted by politics and woke bs beats whiney, corrupt, globalist, elitist, academic, narcissistic, criminal pond scum any day. I’m looking at you PFauci, Wallensky, Biden and John Snowers.
Proof also that each of us can fight back in our own way. Unsurprisingly the bad cat just wrote about that too boriquagato.substack.com/p/how-did-we-g…
Read 6 tweets
9 Sep
Maybe, just maybe, the constant berating to get jabbed, wear masks, mask your kids, distance, hide under your bed, has a more sinister purpose.

You see, once someone complies with these increasingly ridiculous measures, they unwittingly become an ally of the tyrants.

Why? ->
Commitment/Consistency Bias. A very strong innate human tendency.

From Farnam Street fs.blog/2016/08/commit…

"Even when it acts against our best interest our tendency is to be consistent with our prior commitments, ideas, thoughts, words, and actions." ->
"Part of the reason this happens is our desire to appear and feel like we’re right. We also want to show people our conviction. This shouldn’t come as a surprise. Society values consistency and conviction even when it is wrong." ->
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(