I had experience today that I believe showcases how universities can and should foster the open discussion of ideas.

I spoke to Prof @RogerPielkeJr’s “Energy, Policy and Society” class about the future of fossil fuels.

Here are 4 things that impressed me about Roger’s class.
🧵
1. Expressing strong challenges and disagreements with politeness.

I was impressed by the fact that whatever the level of a given student’s (or Roger’s) apparent agreement or disagreement with me, they expressed themselves with politeness and nothing resembling personal attacks.
2. Understanding someone’s views before challenging them.

I was impressed by the several students who challenged me *based on an accurate portrayal of my views*.

This is in wonderful contrast to the “straw-manning” of controversial views that often occurs on campuses.
For example, one student accurately described my views on the injustice of restrictions on fossil fuels to the poor world, but asked if a “carbon tax” would be appropriate for the rich world.

You can read some of my perspective on this issue here:
3. Genuine interest in issues and ideas.

I was impressed that the students asked questions about aspects of energy/environment/climate that they clearly cared about, and were interested in my views on, vs. asking questions to virtue signal or to show off.
4. A professor without a political agenda.

While @RogerPielkeJr and I agree on quite a bit, we also disagree on quite a bit policy-wise. He could have tried to “protect” his students from my influence, but instead let them think for themselves about my arguments/positions.
As new institutions and movements emerge to encourage the open discussion of ideas (e.g., University of Austin), they should make sure to consult professors like @RogerPielkeJr who are currently doing a great job at fostering open discussion.
CC free speech advocates @JTLonsdale, @RubinReport, @SamHarrisOrg, @benshapiro, @ShellenbergerMD, @bariweiss, @peterboghossian, @joerogan, @lexfridman.

Check out @RogerPielkeJr if you haven’t already. He’s done a lot to promote rational discourse and sadly gotten a lot of abuse.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alex Epstein

Alex Epstein Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlexEpstein

3 Dec
Starbucks' Dangerous Deceptions

@Starbucks, an advocate of disastrous “net zero” and "100% renewable" policies, positions itself as proof that these policies can work.

In fact, Starbucks’ stores, supply chain, and rapid expansion in China are mostly powered by fossil fuels.🧵 Image
Starbucks is a major supporter of “net zero” and “100% renewable” policies. They are a founding member of the “Transform to Net Zero Initiative,” which pushes businesses and government to rapidly eliminate the fossil fuels that today provide 80% of the world’s energy. Image
To help justify its support of “net zero” and “100% renewable,” Starbucks portrays itself as well on its way toward these goals, with stores that are already powered by solar and wind energy. Image
Read 18 tweets
1 Dec
We are in the middle of a mass-propaganda campaign to deny the obvious fact that Joe Biden and other anti-oil politicians have unnecessarily driven up oil and gasoline prices by reducing the *supply* of oil through massive restrictions on oil production and transport.

THREAD
President Biden and other anti-oil politicians around the world are in a bind: they want the *prestige* that comes with their decades of restricting the production and transport of oil, but they do not want the *results*: voters angry about rising oil and gasoline prices.
Since November 2020, crude oil spot prices have doubled--rising from about $40/barrel to over $80/barrel and the avg price for regular gasoline has risen from $2.10/gallon to $3.30/gallon. These skyrocketing prices are contributing to low Presidential approval ratings.
Read 11 tweets
30 Nov
Skyrocketing oil and gasoline policies are not a failure of the oil industry. They are the total failure of *anti-oil politicians*, who have artificially restricted the *supply* of oil with massive restrictions and threats to oil production and transport.

THREAD
Elizabeth Warren says gasoline prices are rising "because giant oil companies like Chevron and ExxonMobil enjoy doubling their profits." Joe Biden says "companies have not ramped up the supply of oil quickly enough."

These anti-oil politicians should blame themselves instead.
Contrary to rhetoric by Elizabeth Warren and others, oil and gasoline prices are not rising "because giant oil companies like Chevron and ExxonMobil enjoy doubling their profits." If oil companies could control prices they would have done so during often-unprofitable 2015-2020.
Read 13 tweets
26 Nov
Great @financialpost commentary by climate economist @RossMcKitrick on phony declarations of "climate emergencies."

Full disclosure: I may be biased because he uses one of my favorite expressions, with credit.
👇
financialpost.com/opinion/ross-m…
"despite the enormous growth in world population, deaths due to natural disasters plummeted over the 20th century....As author @AlexEpstein notes, fossil fuels didn’t take a safe climate and make it dangerous, they took a dangerous climate and made it safer." @RossMcKitrick
"Do city councils that issue climate emergency declarations begin ramping up disaster preparedness? Do they upgrade their drainage systems....No, more likely they just book tickets for an ever-larger delegation to whichever climate conference is coming up next..." -@RossMcKitrick
Read 4 tweets
26 Nov
"When I think climate change, I think [Chinese] jobs."
--President Joe Biden
Here's why the reconciliation bill, aka "Build Back Better," will create mass "green joblessness." One of many reasons it should be called "Make Everything Worse."
alexepstein.substack.com/p/talking-poin…
"Climate envoy" John Kerry is also clueless about energy jobs.
Read 8 tweets
25 Nov
WINNING

My humanistic approach to energy/climate, which completely discredits Extinction Rebellion, has compelled them to attack me.

@ExtinctionR calls me "Koch-funded" yet none of their sources give any evidence for this false claim.

If XR cares about facts it will apologize.
For my actual relationship to industry, which I am proud of, see this video.

I admire the Kochs and would be proud of being funded by them, provided they respected my independence--as I require of everyone I deal with.

But Koch hasn't funded me.
The only "evidence" I've seen offered for the "Koch-funded" lie is:
1. Koch supposedly gave my former employer a small contribution a long time ago.
2. Of the hundreds of speeches I have given, 4 have been to Koch-connected groups. 2 for free because I admire them.

What a joke.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(