Buffy Wicks Profile picture
Dec 3, 2021 22 tweets 4 min read Read on X
How do I begin to unpack how deeply disturbed I was by yesterday’s Supreme Court arguments?
 
Justice Sotomayor spoke for so many of us with this question. She spoke for me.

In September, I had a miscarriage requiring an emergency abortion procedure —

(tw // miscarriage)
I was making lunch at my kitchen counter when I began to feel severe cramping, accompanied by heavy bleeding. I knew something wasn’t right. I took Advil, and hoped it would resolve itself — it didn’t.
 
So I called my doctor, who presented to me a number of possible causes —
I’m 44 years old. I had just finished weaning my youngest daughter from breastfeeding, & my body was experiencing hormonal changes. She said it could just be a hormonal imbalance, or it could be fibroids, endometriosis, or perimenopause.
But my doctor said the most important thing was to put a stop to the heavy bleeding—because if it didn’t stop, I would have to go to the emergency room.
 
She prescribed me 800mg of Advil, & 3 birth control pills to take all at once.
 
And that did, initially, stem the bleeding.
It didn’t last. By the next morning, my condition worsened. And when I found myself doubled over & barely able to walk as I struggled to get my daughter ready for school, I knew it was serious.
My healthcare provider was able to get me into the doctor that morning. After an examination, ultrasound & pregnancy test, she told me “You’re pregnant. You’re miscarrying. And you need a D&C (an emergency abortion procedure) now.”
It was hard to process what I was being told – it happened w/dizzying speed. Learning I was pregnant. Learning that the pregnancy was no longer viable. And learning that I needed an emergency abortion.
The way the doctor explained it, there wasn’t any decision to be made. The choice was clear: I needed to undergo this procedure as a matter of healthcare. It wasn't a difficult call, because there was no call to be made.
Did that make it easier? It did.
 
But it didn't keep me from experiencing such an intense range of emotions, all at once, not to mention the physical pain I was experiencing.

And this all happened the week we learned about Texas’ extreme abortion ban—it was very front of mind.
During this medically necessary abortion, for a pregnancy I had literally just learned about, I asked if my procedure would have been off the table under Texas’ abortion ban.

The doctor said, given access issues, it could be very difficult.
Under Texas’ abortion ban, my specific abortion would have *technically* been permitted since my pregnancy was no longer viable. But in practical terms, ACCESS to this healthcare would have been my barrier —
Texas’ law makes accessing any procedure so incredibly difficult because of its impact on abortion providers’ ability to even operate in the state.
These bills banning abortions & restricting access to care are creating a culture of fear and confusion—& that’s by design. To make people uncertain about what kind of care is available to them, and how they can access it. And to make women scared to even ask about their options.
Think about the cruelty involved in making it your aim to make life more difficult for someone in that situation: in great pain, bleeding profusely, barely able to walk, confused about what’s happening to them, unsure about where to go —
And then forcing them to endure multi-state drives, or frantic rushes to the airport for the next flight to a state where getting the medically necessary healthcare they need is still *legal* & *available*. And that’s assuming they have the privilege & means to get those options.
Thankfully, here in the East Bay, all it took for me to access the care I needed was a short drive to my healthcare provider. I was able to get timely access & attention for what was a painful medical emergency.
But if I were in a state where providers are closing down – even though my situation would have *technically* been allowed, finding timely access could have jeopardized my health.
For women in states where our freedoms may be pulled back, getting that medically necessary care wouldn’t just be a question of timing & withstanding pain — it could be impossible. It would mean enduring a medical emergency w/out the care they need. It could be life-threatening.
When we read stories about these new attempts to ban abortions — when the Supreme Court was arguing the very existence of Roe v. Wade yesterday — the conversations are often abstract. The questions posed, and situations considered, usually theoretical.
But real lives are at stake. And *that’s* why listening to yesterday’s Supreme Court proceedings was so deeply disturbing to so many of us.
So, when Justice Sotomayor asked “When does the life of a woman and putting her at risk enter the calculus?” – she was asking for me. She was asking for my daughters. She was asking for millions of people in America.
It’s *our* freedoms that are being openly discussed. It’s *our* ability to access the healthcare that we need that’s in jeopardy. It’s *our* lives that are, literally, at stake

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Buffy Wicks

Buffy Wicks Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BuffyWicks

Mar 29, 2022
Today I'm announcing that I have made a decision to hold #AB1993, which would require all California businesses to require their employees and independent contractors to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Thread —
Our priority during this pandemic has been to make sure all Californians are as safe as possible by following the data and science around public health — which is why California continues to have some of the lowest COVID case rates, deaths and injuries per capita. (2/7)
We introduced AB 1993 because of the workers, employers & public health experts who expressed the need for vaccine requirements, yet felt unable to make these changes on their own.

We're now in a new & welcome chapter in this pandemic, w/the virus receding for the moment. (3/7)
Read 7 tweets
Sep 14, 2021
Last wk was the 2021 #CALeg bill deadline. I'm proud to say 4 of my bills are headed to the Gov's desk for consideration!

#AB1405 adds essential guardrails to the debt settlement industry—protecting consumers from bad actors & harmful business paractices.calmatters.org/california-div…
#AB1455 provides the survivors of those sexually assaulted by law enforcement officers, more time to seek a civil claim w/out fear of intimidation or retribution. It allows victims up to ten years after such a law enforcement officer is no longer employed, to file a civil claim.
#AB518 will move CA toward a more progressive criminal justice system, by restoring judges' discretion to choose sentences that best fits when multiple offenses are committed during a single act. This allows for fairer sentences—rather than just always forcing the strictest one.
Read 5 tweets
Jul 20, 2021
This is alarming: CA's new COVID surge would have put many counties back into the most restrictive tier under our reopening blueprint.

It's time we do something uncomfortable: make vaccination mandatory—at schools, gyms, hospitals, workplaces, etc. Thread—mercurynews.com/2021/07/19/cal…
Universities across the US are making the responsible choice by requiring that students & staff get vaccinated. A federal appeals court just upheld their right to require vaccination. Many more schools, hospitals, businesses & workplaces should do the same.cnn.com/2021/07/19/us/…
In upholding Indiana University’s vaccination requirement, the court wrote: "Progress has been made b/c of the vaccine, not despite it—IU acted reasonably here in pursuing public health & safety for its campus communities.”

Of course this is 100% correct.news.yahoo.com/federal-judge-…
Read 12 tweets
May 28, 2021
Proud to share that #AB1041, the Chosen Family Act, passed the Assembly!

AB 1041 would expand the definition of family to allow workers to take time off to care for their "designated person"—more accurately reflecting today's diverse families, esp. in the LGBTQI community. (1/4)
As my colleague, & proud co-author of #AB1041, @BauerKahan pointed out: CA is home to so many diverse, multi-generational families—it isn't always biological family who is there to care for children in a time of need.

She shared her beautiful, personal story of "My Diane." (2/4)
And as my other colleague @AsmChrisWard so eloquently put it, #AB1041 reflects California’s values: accepting & appreciating people for who they are, as well as who they love as family — and ensuring that our workplace policies take our beautiful diversity into account. (3/4)
Read 4 tweets
Jan 9, 2021
Today, Governor @GavinNewsom released his proposed 2021-22 budget. As California begins its recovery in the wake of the #COVID19 pandemic, I’m encouraged by the Governor’s priorities & proposed investments to support Californians hardest hit by its impacts.a15.asmdc.org/press-releases…
This year’s budget, necessarily, looks very different from last year’s — and helping working families recover from the pandemic must be the lens through which all decisions are made.gov.ca.gov/2021/01/08/gov…
Above all, I’m heartened by the proposed $4.4B aimed directly at Californians’ needs in this moment — funding to get all Californians vaccinated, direct stimulus payments, and grants and fee waivers for small businesses across the state.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 6, 2021
.@angela_rye speaking truth on CNN:

“Here is the real unfortunate reality, to quote fmr Sen Majority Leader Harry Reid on Donald Trump: He is the Frankenstein of the Republican Party. I’m not going to take the onus off the Republican Party for the monster *they* built & created—
“Let’s not put all the responsibility at the feet of Trump. Let’s instead put some responsibility on those who worked *diligently* to suppress votes—then wanted to call John Lewis the conscience of the Congress when he died—but *still* won’t pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act—
“Let’s not take the responsibility away from the people who still have the power — and the *votes* — to do the right thing in the United States Senate. Whether it’s on voting rights, election security, or COVID relief—
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(