Pak not once elected Mullahs to power. Whereas India despite being a secular state, ruled by the(so-called)secular party for over 50-years is a Hindu Rashtra.
India's forefathers used secularism as a tool to subjugate others, Jinnah called their bluff & proven right time & again.
Congress&BJP both adhere to "Secularism" but both use it as a tool to keep Muslim,non-muslim and scheduled casts subjugated.
BJP membership form requires the taking of a pledge that contains the line: "I subscribe to the concept of secular state & nation not based on religion."
It's just that BJP is more vocal about 'Hindu Rashtra' than congress. During Congress tenured, there were scores of state-sponsored pogroms not only against Muslims but also against Sikhs killing thousands.
India has a population of ~ 200 million Muslims approx 15% of its total population. There was not a single Muslim chief minister in India in 2021: the last one having lost her office with the dismissal of the Jammu and Kashmir government.
Outside Kashmir, no Muslim chief minister of a state has even completed a full term since independence. India’s 200 million Muslims have been kept marginalized in politics.
There is no Muslim minister in fifteen of India’s twenty-eight states. In the cabinets of ten of..
..the remaining thirteen states, there was a single Muslim minister.
India’s Scheduled Castes are about 16% of the population and are given 84 reserved seats in the Lok Sabha. The Scheduled Tribes, which are 8% of the population, get 47 reserved seats.
Muslims have none and are the most under-represented section of India in Parliament.
Of 303 Lok Sabha members of parliament, not one is a Muslim. There has been no Muslim representative of any party from Gujarat in the Lok Sabha since 1985.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
جب خادم رضوی اور ٹولا ضعیف،من گھڑت روایتیں سنا کر لوگوں کو ورغلا رہے تھے،اس وقت کسی بھی مسلک کے مفتیان دین نے رتی برابر کوشش نہیں کی کہ عوام کوحقیقت بتائی جائےاور شدت پسندی سےروکا جائے۔
مولویوں کی ان حرکتوں کی وجہ سے آدھی نوجوان نسل "مذہبی جنونی" بن رہی اور باقی "مذہب بیزار"۔
سب مسلکوں کے اکابرین نے چپ ساد لی تھی اور ابھی بھی خاموش ہیں۔ کسی ایک نے یہ جسارت نہیں کی کہ ایک ایسا شخص کیسے عاشق ہو سکتا ہے جس کو اپنے عشق ثابت کرنے کے لیے دوسروں کو گالیاں بکنی پڑیں اور معصوم لوگوں کا قتل کرنا پڑے؟
خادم رضوی نے ایدھی جیسے بےضرر شخص کو بھی نہیں چھوڑا تھا۔
دوسرے مسالک کے اندھے مقلدین اب آپ کو یہ عذر پیش کرتے نظر آئیں گے کے ہمارے اعلیٰ حضرت نے اس لیے لبیک والوں کی درندگی اور شدت پسندی کی مذمت نہیں کی کیونکہ
فرقہ واریت بڑھ سکتی تھی۔
ان کے سپوٹرز کے لیے عرض ہے کہ ہر چیز بلیک اینڈ وائٹ میں نہیں ہوتی۔ یہ ضروری نہیں..
ایک بار پھر سے یاد دلواتا چلوں، جب تک عالم اور مفتیان دین "عاشق رسول (ص)" کے نام پر ہونے والی دہشتگردی کی بلا کسی جھجک کے اس کو غلط نہیں قرار دیں گے۔ ایسے واقعات ہوتے رہیں گے۔
ریاست لبیک والوں کے ساتھ ہر حربہ استعمال کر چکی ہے لیکن ان کی جنونیت ختم نہیں ہو رہی۔
After the Jalalabad incident, BB in her 1st tenure replaced Gen Hamid Gul - thn DG-ISI. She went on to appoint a retired Gen as DG-ISI even though Gen Beg advised against such appointment & forwarded a list of three serving Generals for DG-ISI appointment, BB sent her regrets.
There are many who played a critical part in the Pakistan nuclear program, Dr A.Q. Khan's role was one of them.
As soon as Bhutto came to power, Bhutto held discussions with Libya and other states such as Saudi Arabia to line up financing for a nuclear weapons program.
Bhutto’s initiative served as a magnet for Pakistani scientists abroad, many of whom returned to their homeland to contribute whatever they could to the national nuclear development program.
By the mid-70s, the PAEC team had acquired a substantial amount of knowledge..
and technology for enrichment of uranium and even set up experimental centrifuge cascades based on an Italian design at a site in Chaklala. But the real impetus for the pursuit of the enrichment route to nuclear weapons came with the arrival of Dr. A.Q. Khan.
Since talks with TTP are being debated, hence in this thread I will focus on TTP based on these factors.
For any insurgency to sustain and be successful, it depends on the following factors: 1. Ideology 2. Local support/manpower 3. Financial and military support (Foreign)
Many mistakenly think that TTP demand of imposition of Shariah got them support across Pak hence they managed to wreak havoc.
Note: This point is not for or against the imposition of Shariah but to clarify TTP's phenomenal rise to a brutal insurgency..
..wasn't directly linked to Shariah's demand. There were, still are many groups (violent and non-violent) in Pak that demand the imposition of Shariah but no one got even close to TTP.
TTP derives its ideology & rallying cry from anti-US sentiments..
In the Battle of Yamama, after each duel Khalid ibn-al-Waleed would recite his own extemporized verses:
"I am the son of many chiefs.
My sword is sharp and terrible.
It is the mightiest of things
When the pot of war boils fiercely."
[Thumamah bin Uthal, a Companion from the tribe of Musaylimah told Musaylimah:
"Musaylimah! Recant - do not contend,
For in prophethood you have not been given a share.
You lied about Allah regarding His revelation
And your desires are the whims of a stupid fool..
..Your people have indulged you instead of preventing you,
But if Khalid comes to them you will be abandoned.
Then you will have no stairway to the heavens
And no path to travel in the earth."