It’s a lot of the same excuses we have heard in global health for decades…
When it’s really about profits
We have to recognize that all the noise is gaslighting by pharmaceutical companies & everyone they own
2/ “People are hesitant anyways”
“other companies can’t make these vaccines”
“Tech transfers are too complicated”
“Supply chain is too difficult”
The list is endless but I don’t think any of it is true
If the money was there, it would be done …like two years ago
3/ Honestly— it would be easier if the Bancels and Bourlas of the world just said “yes we are going to sell to the highest bidders— we don’t care about anything else”
Then we could start realigning the system; &/or finding other ways to hold big pharma accountable
4/ Until then it will be a bunch of talking heads & headlines saying the same things over & over year after year about inequity
And poor people in exploited countries will just keep getting blamed for disease when rich countries hoard resources & this is all normalized again
5/ Without fundamentally changing the system of how medicines/ vaccines are developed & sold during health emergencies, we cannot be surprised that the system is giving the outcomes it was designed to give.
Framing of vaccines must be that they are a critical tool in a larger toolbox- not a means to throw the toolbox out altogether
Why?
As we start rolling out boosters again to wider population, we must still have ways to slow spread (now & future) with other interventions
2/ Too often, I am seeing concerns that if we push vaccines plus other interventions, we will lose people on the vaccines front
That is a failure of messaging and expectation setting
Public health experts may have to do better on communicating what each intervention can do
3/ There are of course many people for whom the incentive toward getting vaccinated is getting back to 'life as usual' without masks or taking precautions
Critical to appreciate how much vaccines have already done to prevent severe disease/deaths
One thing I guarantee you will notice if you pay attention
Doctors who have cared for #covid19 patients will never underestimate what this virus is capable of
The antivax, antimask pundits who have been tweeting from the safety of their home for the past two years often will
2/ I have yet to meet a fellow physician who has spent the majority of their time caring for these cases who would claim to know exactly what to expect from #SARSCoV2 — bc we continue to be surprised. Surprised by people who die that shouldn’t. People who suffer for longer than
3/ …we would expect. People who seem to get better & then suddenly turn for the worse. People who are doing poorly & who end up surviving.
Medicine humbles us as clinicians; this virus has too.
Something on my mind— at least weekly, one of the consults I see on the infectious disease service suffered not only #covid19 but thereafter so many other med complications from clotting, long term ventilator, indwelling lines etc; not to mention the psychological aspect of this
2/ This is more broadly to say— anyone who has been critically ill knows that there is so much more to this than whether you survive or not
People who are against masks and vaccines etc often try to cite general mortality statistics
I fear they don’t understand the other side
3/ They don’t understand the suffering that patients & families have gone through
They don’t understand the long term consequences socially, psychologically, & otherwise that can scar people for a long time afterwards
1/ Really a privilege to hear from Dr. Steve Luby @StanfordCIGH discuss the now well-known Bangladesh masks randomized trial for #covid19
One of the most important take-aways for me is that masking actually increased physical distancing, not the opposite.
Why does this matter?
2/ As you may remember from earlier last year, one of the reasons that the US public health agencies said that community masking would be harmful is that it could decrease physical distancing & increase transmission.
This hypothesis was used to support early policy against masks
3/ Many of us pushed back saying that this “risk compensation” logic wasn’t necessarily true— that masking could instead serve as a reminder that we were in a pandemic.
And that it could increase distancing + provide personal protection + source control
2/ Fundamentally, there are two parts to the equation—
Am I protected?
And am I at high risk of transmitting to those who are not?
As vaccine effectiveness wanes against infections in all age groups, those of us who have a lot of exposure to the virus & to vulnerable folks…
3/ are going to increasingly be at higher risk of transmitting onwards.
As a doctor taking care of immunocompromised patients in whom vaccines don’t work as well— reducing the chance of getting infected becomes more important. This holds true for those with…