The same applies to Gandhi and Sri Rama too but your Trad Khujli will never kick in because it doesn't serve your Congressi agenda of widening the Savarna and OBC-SC fault line.
Sri Rama, son of Dashratha and king of Ayodhya.

No! I meant Gandhi is no less anti-Sri Rama (of Ayodhya) than Phule or Ambedkar.
More than that. Gandhi rejected Avatara Principle and called Sri Rama a bigger demon than Ravana.

Dashrath Putra Ram was mere a human for Gandhi.

And yet he was sold as Ram-bhakta to Hindu masses by the forefathers of present day Trads.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with हिरण्यरेता

हिरण्यरेता Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Hiranyareta

4 Dec
You know the reality of why you said that. Ask yourself honestly with a hand on your heart. As I said, your "Aoukaat" is to wash the bum (in the form of doing Swastivachan) of anyone who can throw some coins.
Effing मोहपातर!!
Dora's Arse Wiper tried hitting 2 birds (( i) Mocking Shiva's temple per his Madhwaite beliefs and (ii) cursing Modi for rejecting Swastivachan offer and not throwing coins) with one stone hiding behind this post-facto lame excuse and thought nobody will notice it.
Even someone with the head in his arse will know that BJP is the least harmful (if not pro Hindu as Trads say) to Hindu interests. Because any party who has Muslim vote as its power base, it can offer you "Revadi and Malayi" but it can't offer anything+ 1/
Read 8 tweets
3 Dec
Tulsidas didn't start any new school like post 1000AD Vaishnavacharyas. His tradition is the same as that of Veda Vyasaya, Sukdeva, Yagnavalkya ie श्रौत-स्मार्त tradition which existed before the advent of post 1000AD Vaishnavism. He states it by "नानापुराणनिगमागमसम्मतं यद्...."
Aisa kya bol diya maine inko? 😊 Image
I quote Tulsidas not because I like him. I like him because he never deviates from श्रुति मार्ग of Veda Vyasa, Sukdeva, and other ancient Vedic sages. The same can't be said about post 1000AD Vaishnavacharyas.

1/

Read 8 tweets
3 Dec
Maybe but the fact remains that paramAtma Hari in his ultimate form (तत्वत:) is
"वदन्ति तत्तत्त्वविदस्तत्त्वं यज्ज्ञानमद्वयम्।
ब्रह्मेति परमात्मेति भगवानिति शब्द्यते" ~ श्रीमद्भागवतम् १।२।११

ie non-anthropomorphic (beyond Naam-Roop).
1/6
paramAtma Hari (or Har) in His four-armed manifestation or five-headed manifestation is only a relative truth wrt Upasaka/Bhakta ie

"रक्षको विष्णुरित्वादि ब्रह्मासृष्टेस्तु कारणम्।
संहारेरुद्र इत्येव सर्व मिथ्येति निश्चिनु॥"~ तेजोबिन्दूपनिषत् (५।५१-५२)

2/6
Or as my Tulsi Baba would say:

"नाम रूप दुइ ईस उपाधी" ~ श्रीरामचरितमानस

"एक अनीह अरूप अनामा। अज सच्चिदानंद पर धामा॥
ब्यापक बिस्वरूप भगवाना। तेहिं धरि देह चरित कृत नाना॥
सो केवल भगतन हित लागी। परम कृपाल प्रनत अनुरागी॥" ~ श्रीरामचरितमानस

3/6
Read 9 tweets
3 Dec
You are entitled to your belief but any proof from Puarans, Vedas for it, or just "Acharya Kathan"?
तारसारोपनिषत् is a शुक्लयजुर्वेदीया Upanishad.

"ॐ यो ह वै श्रीपरमात्मा नारायणः स भगवान्मकारवाच्यः
शिवस्वरूपो हनूमान्भूर्भुवः सुवस्तस्मै वै नमोनमः ॥ " ~ तारसारोपनिषत् (२।३)

sanskritdocuments.org/doc_upanishhat…

ऋग्वेदमें मन्त्रद्रष्टा ऋषिद्वारा स्वकार्यसिद्धिके लिये रुद्ररूप हनुमानके आवाहनका वर्णन मिलता है
"कृशानुमस्तृन तिष्यं सधस्थ आ
रुद्रं रुद्रेषु रुद्रियं हवामहे ।'" - (ऋग्वेद १० । ६४ । ८)

1/6

Read 8 tweets
2 Dec
श्रीमद्भागवत too must be a Tamsic Purana. 😊
Exactly!! You see the continuity of श्रीमद्भागवत in Ramcharitmanas when Tulsidas writes "सेवक स्वामि सखा सिय पी के।" (जो(शिव) सीतापति श्री रामचन्द्रजी के सेवक, स्वामी और सखा हैं) for Mahadeva. You find this missing in post 1000AD Vaishnava Sampradayas.

While doing Manglacharan at the beginning of each Kanda of his Ramayana, Goswami Tulsidas do Vandana to both Mahadeva and Sri Rama.
1/2
Read 4 tweets
2 Dec
Our sages order slaying of a gangster instead of playing Ahimsa pipe like Congressi Mahatmas.

"करि बिनती सुर सकल सिधाए। तेही समय देवरिषि आए॥
गगनोपरि हरि गुन गन गाए। रुचिर बीररस प्रभु मन भाए॥
बेगि हतहु खल कहि मुनि गए। राम समर महि सोभत भए॥"
1/2
भावार्थ:-विनती करके सब देवता चले गए। उसी समय देवर्षि नारद आए।आकाश के ऊपर से उन्होंने श्री हरि के सुंदर वीर रसयुक्त गुण समूह का गान किया, जो प्रभु के मन को बहुत ही भाया। मुनि यह कहकर चले गए कि अब दुष्ट रावण को शीघ्र मारिए। (उस समय) श्री रामचंद्रजी रणभूमि में आकर सुशोभित हुए।
2/2
क्या गाँधी के राम ऐसे हो सकते हैं जिनके शरीर पर वध किये गये आततायियों के खून के छींटे हों?😊

संग्राम भूमि बिराज रघुपति अतुल बल कोसल धनी।
श्रम बिंदु मुख राजीव लोचन अरुन तन सोनित कनी॥
भुज जुगल फेरत सर सरासन भालु कपि चहु दिसि बने।
कह दास तुलसी कहि न सक छबि सेष जेहि आनन घने॥
1/3
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(