In the following two clips, it's amazing to watch Graham Linehan and Arty Morty squirm as Helen deploys their own "weaponising suicide" argument against them, in relation to how annoyed she was to have to hear about Arty's trans friend who died.
CW: Discussion of suicide.
Arty responds saying he wasn't trying to weaponise suicide. His trans friend "literally died" and he was trying to stop it happening to someone else.
Helen responds by finding a way to switch the discussion to JK Rowling. Just incredible.
Also, in the first clip, note how Linehan tries to remonstrate with Helen by saying, "but, Helen, the difference is Arty did have a friend who (died by) suicide" and she has to point out to him, "And so do many of them!" Did he think trans people were actually lying about that?
I am also amazed that, after his friend died, Arty has suddenly realised that piling-on trans people might be a terrible idea for their mental health, when he's sitting in a Zoom chat with a man who made doing that his raison d'etre on Twitter. The hypocrisy. Can they not see it?
Hi @artymortyarty, I am very sorry to hear about your friend, but you're also the guy who said that you wouldn't believe that trans kids were really trans until you saw evidence that 5 million had died by suicide.
Graham laughed at that.
On reflection, isn't one one too many?
How does it feel to be the position of many trans people, who are either not believed (Graham) or who are greeted with accusations of "weaponising suicide" (Helen) when they bring up the deaths of their friends, or the statistics on suicide?
And here you are, this year, using the exact same argument that Helen is using against you.
Having had that experience yourself, how do you think that person felt when you tweeted that at them?
Did you really care at the time?
Do you really think you were wrong with what you drunkenly tweeted, or are you just trying to save face?
I think you just got a live demonstration of your point that - at the very least - some gender critical people don't give a damn about your dead trans friend.
They have no empathy.
They are literally offended by having to hear it.
Essentially they're saying, "What's that got to do with me?"
"You're just looking for a villian...like JK Rowling," as Helen said, and then she switched to talking about how lovely JK Rowling is.
In Vino Veritas.
And I think you know that.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Two videos, one near the start of 2021, the other near the end, which neatly demonstrate how the UK anti-trans movement is going internally:
"All the people I've met in this, I consider my foxhole friends...you all just inspire the hell out of me." - Graham Linehan.
Yet... 1/
Just under a year later...
"...let's just win and then go our separate ways because there's absolutely no reason we need to be friends with each other or even associated with each other beyond this fight." - Graham Linehan
The "better friends" part of your life, eh? 2/
What's tragic is that this is the bit leading up to GL's first statement. They've duped people like this into thinking losing their actual friends is a *good* thing that should make them happy, and barely a year later Graham is saying that that "friendship" is temporary. 3/
I don't think the guy who was laughing it up with Graham Linehan - an incredibly angry man - in 2019, about inventing phrases like "the Woke Stasi" to describe people who support trans rights, is going to bring any introspection to the subject of online anger.
I would also add that the guy who has a history of blackface - albeit that he apologised of late - might not be the best guy to be given a TV show to discuss "angry" movements like BLM.
How many shows and articles by UK celebrity men past their peak are we going to get on this?
This is nothing but the establishment handing middle-aged men who could once do blackface on TV to slag off black footballers without consequence a platform to moan about the fact that they can't do that anymore without hearing from the people who are angry about that.
Might be worth revisiting this video from 2015 where Richard Dawkins hypotheses - admittedly, based on no evidence at all - that "modern" male homosexuality might be a result of bottle-feeding, whereas a breastfed baby wouldn't be homosexual.
I'm not joking.
The full video, where he also hypotheses that perhaps dominant males with harems who went hunting left behind "ostentatiously homosexual" males to guard the women, and that's how homosexuality escaped being "got rid of" by the evolutionary process?!
The video starts well, but once he starts offering wild ideas about how homosexuality survives the evolutionary process, it certainly doesn't "refresh my mind with science." It gives you the idea of a man stabbing the dark, when the best answer is, "I don't know, but it did."
Graham Linehan's YouTube co-host got drunk and told the truth on Twitter.
A lot of Rad Fems want trans people to die.("AGP" is what Arty calls most trans women, and it's a way of slurring trans women as perverts who transition for sexual reasons.)
Imagine being Graham Linehan's co-host and having the gall to write the last sentence here.
They provide these people with an hour-long weekly hate, and now he's getting squeamish about the hatred they create?
You know that in the wee drunken hours a lot of "gender critical" people grapple with the fact that they might actually be in a hate movement, but are faced with the sunk cost fallacy.
He realises that he cannot criticise the "angry assholes" because they will turn on him.
Here are two snips of articles about Nicole Maines, and the questions she asked at 3 years old. She's now a 20-something trans woman.
And then, here is @DrJessTaylor tweeting that hating your genitalia at three years old is an indication that you've been sexually abused!
"Safeguard immediately" means that in her professional opinion, once Nicole asked about when her penis was going to fall off, she should have been removed from the home, and adults in contact with her - her parents - should be investigated for sexual abuse.
This is, in my opinion, a huge issue with professionals in contact with children who are "gender critical" in the workplace. They would immediately choose to devastate Nicole's family and Nicole because they would not firstly consider that she may be trans?!
This is the thing with "gender critical" people. They want to simultaneously be taken seriously, but also not face any consequences for any sort of abuse they are guilty of doling out.
Clearly, Sinead is proud to represent @genspect online with her Twitter account.
They've had nearly two days to comment. They haven't.