Two videos, one near the start of 2021, the other near the end, which neatly demonstrate how the UK anti-trans movement is going internally:
"All the people I've met in this, I consider my foxhole friends...you all just inspire the hell out of me." - Graham Linehan.
Yet... 1/
Just under a year later...
"...let's just win and then go our separate ways because there's absolutely no reason we need to be friends with each other or even associated with each other beyond this fight." - Graham Linehan
The "better friends" part of your life, eh? 2/
What's tragic is that this is the bit leading up to GL's first statement. They've duped people like this into thinking losing their actual friends is a *good* thing that should make them happy, and barely a year later Graham is saying that that "friendship" is temporary. 3/
I have seen umpteen posts and threads from gender critical people talking about falling out with family and friends and how it's okay because their new online friends are "better."
This is cult-like thinking.
It's simply not true.
It's conditional allyship, at best. 4/
I think Arty - sitting "beside" Graham - was the originator of the "welcome to the better friends part of your life" statement, and yet, under a year later, he's talking about how he's getting such abuse from people in the anti-trans movement it's affecting his mental health. 5/
I know of one particular gender critical woman who hasn't spoken to her daughter in two years over her beliefs.
You can never get that time back.
I know some gender critical people follow me. For the love of all that is good, make-up with your *actual* friends, today. Now. 6/
You're not going to "win."
What does that even mean?
Send a million tweets, go to a thousand meetings, tell everyone how much you love JK Rowling a hundred times etc. etc.
Trans people aren't going anywhere.
They'll still be there long after you stop. 7/
And what you'll be left with is memories of an online gang who weren't your friends, people who might not even want to be associated with you in the future.
How do you know that is true?
Because Graham Linehan is literally telling you that's true. 8/
You've fallen into a conspiracy theory cult, and the good news is that a lot of you can still get out of the hole, and get your lives back.
Don't be that woman in the third video, who so clearly doth protest too much. 9/9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the following two clips, it's amazing to watch Graham Linehan and Arty Morty squirm as Helen deploys their own "weaponising suicide" argument against them, in relation to how annoyed she was to have to hear about Arty's trans friend who died.
CW: Discussion of suicide.
Arty responds saying he wasn't trying to weaponise suicide. His trans friend "literally died" and he was trying to stop it happening to someone else.
Helen responds by finding a way to switch the discussion to JK Rowling. Just incredible.
Also, in the first clip, note how Linehan tries to remonstrate with Helen by saying, "but, Helen, the difference is Arty did have a friend who (died by) suicide" and she has to point out to him, "And so do many of them!" Did he think trans people were actually lying about that?
I don't think the guy who was laughing it up with Graham Linehan - an incredibly angry man - in 2019, about inventing phrases like "the Woke Stasi" to describe people who support trans rights, is going to bring any introspection to the subject of online anger.
I would also add that the guy who has a history of blackface - albeit that he apologised of late - might not be the best guy to be given a TV show to discuss "angry" movements like BLM.
How many shows and articles by UK celebrity men past their peak are we going to get on this?
This is nothing but the establishment handing middle-aged men who could once do blackface on TV to slag off black footballers without consequence a platform to moan about the fact that they can't do that anymore without hearing from the people who are angry about that.
Might be worth revisiting this video from 2015 where Richard Dawkins hypotheses - admittedly, based on no evidence at all - that "modern" male homosexuality might be a result of bottle-feeding, whereas a breastfed baby wouldn't be homosexual.
I'm not joking.
The full video, where he also hypotheses that perhaps dominant males with harems who went hunting left behind "ostentatiously homosexual" males to guard the women, and that's how homosexuality escaped being "got rid of" by the evolutionary process?!
The video starts well, but once he starts offering wild ideas about how homosexuality survives the evolutionary process, it certainly doesn't "refresh my mind with science." It gives you the idea of a man stabbing the dark, when the best answer is, "I don't know, but it did."
Graham Linehan's YouTube co-host got drunk and told the truth on Twitter.
A lot of Rad Fems want trans people to die.("AGP" is what Arty calls most trans women, and it's a way of slurring trans women as perverts who transition for sexual reasons.)
Imagine being Graham Linehan's co-host and having the gall to write the last sentence here.
They provide these people with an hour-long weekly hate, and now he's getting squeamish about the hatred they create?
You know that in the wee drunken hours a lot of "gender critical" people grapple with the fact that they might actually be in a hate movement, but are faced with the sunk cost fallacy.
He realises that he cannot criticise the "angry assholes" because they will turn on him.
Here are two snips of articles about Nicole Maines, and the questions she asked at 3 years old. She's now a 20-something trans woman.
And then, here is @DrJessTaylor tweeting that hating your genitalia at three years old is an indication that you've been sexually abused!
"Safeguard immediately" means that in her professional opinion, once Nicole asked about when her penis was going to fall off, she should have been removed from the home, and adults in contact with her - her parents - should be investigated for sexual abuse.
This is, in my opinion, a huge issue with professionals in contact with children who are "gender critical" in the workplace. They would immediately choose to devastate Nicole's family and Nicole because they would not firstly consider that she may be trans?!
This is the thing with "gender critical" people. They want to simultaneously be taken seriously, but also not face any consequences for any sort of abuse they are guilty of doling out.
Clearly, Sinead is proud to represent @genspect online with her Twitter account.
They've had nearly two days to comment. They haven't.