Hi @ggreenwald
Important to note that they DID NOT recant within days.
We know because this same group aggressively pushed their Natural Origin narrative to National Academy of Sciences in Feb.
Also, 1st draft of Proximal Origin was completed same day as Fauci Feb 1 call.
Important to note that they DID NOT recant within days.
We know because this same group aggressively pushed their Natural Origin narrative to National Academy of Sciences in Feb.
Also, 1st draft of Proximal Origin was completed same day as Fauci Feb 1 call.
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1467528831909171211
This details how Fauci & other scientists tried to shape the narrative of a NASEM response to the White House in Feb 2020.
2 days after Fauci was told it was a lab leak, his group pushed Natural Origin narrative that was written SAME day as Fauci call.
theepochtimes.com/behind-the-sce…
2 days after Fauci was told it was a lab leak, his group pushed Natural Origin narrative that was written SAME day as Fauci call.
theepochtimes.com/behind-the-sce…
There was a very direct and orchestrated cover-up.
1) Feb 1, 2020 - Fauci told lab leak was 70-80% likely
2) 1st draft of Proximal Origin completed same day
3) Feb 3, 2020 - Fauci presents to NASEM. Daszak & Andersen there
4) Fauci scientists push Natural Origin to NASEM
1) Feb 1, 2020 - Fauci told lab leak was 70-80% likely
2) 1st draft of Proximal Origin completed same day
3) Feb 3, 2020 - Fauci presents to NASEM. Daszak & Andersen there
4) Fauci scientists push Natural Origin to NASEM
Important to note @ggreenwald that Andersen was publicly ridiculing lab leak before & after privately telling Fauci a lab leak was highly likely.
Garry did same. Told Fauci a lab leak was 80% likely on the same day he and other authors completed 1st draft of Proximal origin.
Garry did same. Told Fauci a lab leak was 80% likely on the same day he and other authors completed 1st draft of Proximal origin.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
