..law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell."
This is happening when it comes to the 2017-TLP dharna and the accusation of the TLP-Army collusion, unfortunately making it an uncontested fact.
TLP didn't prop up in 2017..
..it became a full-fledged KeN movement on the eve of Qadri's funeral in 2016 as Rizvi an impressive provocateur took the mantle due to Barelvis leadership vacuum left after TuQ's exit.
There were strong KeN undercurrents in Barelvis due to Asia Bibi and Mumtaz Qadri case..
..the impetus was provided when Mumtaz Qadri was hanged in 2016 and since then there was no turning back.
Please note, during Rizvi led gathering post Mumtaz Qadri funeral..
..not only Rizvi and co used to criticize and abuse PMLN govt but also the Army and then COAS - Raheel Sharif.
The change in the Oath issue was the excuse TLP was looking for and it proved to be a watershed moment for TLP. However, to prevent TLP march towards Islamabad..
..SS govt in Punjab imposed section 144, but lo and behold nowhere in Punjab a serious attempt was made by the govt to stop the TLP march towards Faizabad.
Fast forwards, TLP blocked the main artery of Isb-Rwp, multiple negotiations with them failed..
..finally PMLN govt decided to take use force against them. Two botched attempts were made by the PMLN govt that worsened the situation as TLP protests which were limited to Faizabad spread across Pakistan.
In all this time, NS son-in-law and Maryam's husband -- Capt Safdar..
..continued to support TLP dharna and their demands.
At this time PMLN Govt requested Army to use force against the agitators to clear roads and important junction points. Army advised govt against the use of force because: 1/ Army is not trained and don't have a capacity..
..to control riots esp a fanatic charged mob-like TLP. 2/ Any use of force by the Army would have resulted in the blood bath that could further aggravate the precarious situation (as it happened after Laal Masjid Op).
After govt's approval negotiation started in which...
..army took the lead.
On 26th Nov, Govt appointed Maj Gen Azhar as DG Rangers Punjab to handle and clear the Dharna at Faizabad.
On 27th Nov, after the agreement between Dharna organizers & Govt. Maj Gen Azhar visited the dharna spot, met the leaders, and asked them to clear the Faizabad and adjoining areas.
During this interaction the Dharna organizers asked for their arrested workers..
..to be brought to them before they completely clear the Dharna setup.
When the arrested workers were brought to the Dharna loc they expressed that they don't have money to back home hence Maj Gen Azhar paid them to clear the location immediately. (Though a bad move for optics)
And till this day, distributing money is used as rhetorical proof that Army was behind TLP dharna.
A lazy conclusion that is devoid of any logic and facts.
So Ghmaidi sb who is portrayed as an unbiased researcher and scholar, how he can miss basic facts and ground realities.
Either he is oblivious of ground realities or he is reading and watching too much of Jang and the DAWN group.
(This is coming from an admirer of Ghamidi sb)
Those who are interested in the serious unbiased debate on TLP Dharna. Watch this debate held in LUMS in 2018.
جب خادم رضوی اور ٹولا ضعیف،من گھڑت روایتیں سنا کر لوگوں کو ورغلا رہے تھے،اس وقت کسی بھی مسلک کے مفتیان دین نے رتی برابر کوشش نہیں کی کہ عوام کوحقیقت بتائی جائےاور شدت پسندی سےروکا جائے۔
مولویوں کی ان حرکتوں کی وجہ سے آدھی نوجوان نسل "مذہبی جنونی" بن رہی اور باقی "مذہب بیزار"۔
سب مسلکوں کے اکابرین نے چپ ساد لی تھی اور ابھی بھی خاموش ہیں۔ کسی ایک نے یہ جسارت نہیں کی کہ ایک ایسا شخص کیسے عاشق ہو سکتا ہے جس کو اپنے عشق ثابت کرنے کے لیے دوسروں کو گالیاں بکنی پڑیں اور معصوم لوگوں کا قتل کرنا پڑے؟
خادم رضوی نے ایدھی جیسے بےضرر شخص کو بھی نہیں چھوڑا تھا۔
دوسرے مسالک کے اندھے مقلدین اب آپ کو یہ عذر پیش کرتے نظر آئیں گے کے ہمارے اعلیٰ حضرت نے اس لیے لبیک والوں کی درندگی اور شدت پسندی کی مذمت نہیں کی کیونکہ
فرقہ واریت بڑھ سکتی تھی۔
ان کے سپوٹرز کے لیے عرض ہے کہ ہر چیز بلیک اینڈ وائٹ میں نہیں ہوتی۔ یہ ضروری نہیں..
Pak not once elected Mullahs to power. Whereas India despite being a secular state, ruled by the(so-called)secular party for over 50-years is a Hindu Rashtra.
India's forefathers used secularism as a tool to subjugate others, Jinnah called their bluff & proven right time & again.
Congress&BJP both adhere to "Secularism" but both use it as a tool to keep Muslim,non-muslim and scheduled casts subjugated.
BJP membership form requires the taking of a pledge that contains the line: "I subscribe to the concept of secular state & nation not based on religion."
It's just that BJP is more vocal about 'Hindu Rashtra' than congress. During Congress tenured, there were scores of state-sponsored pogroms not only against Muslims but also against Sikhs killing thousands.
ایک بار پھر سے یاد دلواتا چلوں، جب تک عالم اور مفتیان دین "عاشق رسول (ص)" کے نام پر ہونے والی دہشتگردی کی بلا کسی جھجک کے اس کو غلط نہیں قرار دیں گے۔ ایسے واقعات ہوتے رہیں گے۔
ریاست لبیک والوں کے ساتھ ہر حربہ استعمال کر چکی ہے لیکن ان کی جنونیت ختم نہیں ہو رہی۔
After the Jalalabad incident, BB in her 1st tenure replaced Gen Hamid Gul - thn DG-ISI. She went on to appoint a retired Gen as DG-ISI even though Gen Beg advised against such appointment & forwarded a list of three serving Generals for DG-ISI appointment, BB sent her regrets.
There are many who played a critical part in the Pakistan nuclear program, Dr A.Q. Khan's role was one of them.
As soon as Bhutto came to power, Bhutto held discussions with Libya and other states such as Saudi Arabia to line up financing for a nuclear weapons program.
Bhutto’s initiative served as a magnet for Pakistani scientists abroad, many of whom returned to their homeland to contribute whatever they could to the national nuclear development program.
By the mid-70s, the PAEC team had acquired a substantial amount of knowledge..
and technology for enrichment of uranium and even set up experimental centrifuge cascades based on an Italian design at a site in Chaklala. But the real impetus for the pursuit of the enrichment route to nuclear weapons came with the arrival of Dr. A.Q. Khan.
Since talks with TTP are being debated, hence in this thread I will focus on TTP based on these factors.
For any insurgency to sustain and be successful, it depends on the following factors: 1. Ideology 2. Local support/manpower 3. Financial and military support (Foreign)
Many mistakenly think that TTP demand of imposition of Shariah got them support across Pak hence they managed to wreak havoc.
Note: This point is not for or against the imposition of Shariah but to clarify TTP's phenomenal rise to a brutal insurgency..
..wasn't directly linked to Shariah's demand. There were, still are many groups (violent and non-violent) in Pak that demand the imposition of Shariah but no one got even close to TTP.
TTP derives its ideology & rallying cry from anti-US sentiments..