👉how inclusive the event is
👉how much the summit focuses on innovation and sharing solutions
👉how countries crafted their "commitments"
If handled carefully, the #SummitforDemocracy could tighten relationships based on shared values, but if handled poorly, it could prove divisive. "The messaging will have to be perfect if the Biden team is to walk this tightrope successfully," @ZackCooper says.
Deputy Director David Salvo will be watching to see how the administration addresses the US' own democratic backsliding at the summit. "From the insurrection in January to state laws politicizing the administration of elections, we have plenty of challenges ourselves," he says.
Autocratic actors are increasing their attacks on democracy, and they're finding increasingly fertile ground for their efforts, @davidalanlevine warns. The #SummitforDemocracy could go a long way towards confronting these challenges.
"Ideally, the summit would kick-off a global effort similar to the COP process for climate change, with clear commitments, targets, and regular reporting. Yet without true buy-in from the participants, building such a forum may prove too challenging," @kristineberz says.
Information manipulation should receive significant attention during the #SummitforDemocracy, Bret Schafer says. But it's "hard to imagine, given the list of invitees, that the summit will produce much more than platitudes, unenforceable pledges, and vague commitments."
The White House has already kicked off the week leading up to the #SummitforDemocracy with a bang.
This sets a very high bar for other democracies to match the U.S. level of ambition at the summit later this week, @JoshRudes argues.
While the summit won't stop malign interference attempts, @TypeMRT hopes that participants will coalesce around the idea that a stronger collective cyber deterrence strategy is necessary to prevent further erosion of democratic institutions and backsliding.
While much of the conversation about the summit has focused on which countries were given a place at the table, far more important is a look within and across borders, at the citizens whose active participation ultimately fuels the democratic process, @elen_aghekyan says.
The U.S. should not miss out on a great opportunity to push for closer CEE-Taiwan ties, and the #SummitforDemocracy is the highest profile forum to make this happen, @barros_bryce says.
Europeans are intrigued to see what Washington can come up with to reinject some confidence in democratic values and institutions. On the other hand, they're worried that the focus on democracy risks creating divisions in both NATO and the EU, @EtienneSoula explains.
Follow along over the coming days as we track the #SummitforDemocracy and autocratic actors' messaging against it.
Putin’s threat that Russia would hit targets in Ukraine “that we have not yet attacked” if Kyiv receives long-range missiles from the United States. Russian messengers claimed Ukraine was planning to hit Russia with U.S. weapons and threatened 🇺🇦's allies.
Food Crisis 🥕
Russian diplomats and state media continued to deny responsibility for a global food crisis that experts say was sparked by Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine, instead blaming the shortage on the Covid-19 pandemic, a Western media stunt, and Ukraine.
More than a year and a half after the US Capitol riot, the #January6thCommittee will hold its first public hearing this Thursday. Ahead of the hearing, ASD experts answer questions about January 6th, the Big Lie, and how they're impacting US democracy. securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/qa-with-asd-ex…
What are the facts about the 2020 election?
"The nation’s top intelligence and law enforcement agencies confirmed that there was no evidence of significant interference or election fraud in 2020 and that the results were legitimate," @davidalanlevine says.
"The Big Lie narratives have been effective b/c they are grounded in national conversations about electoral integrity that preceded the 2020 election, & that created alarm and insecurities about the single greatest process that defines American democracy—free and fair elections."
As Russia continued its assault on Ukraine last week, it also continued to spread disinformation to try to convince the world that Russia is not to blame—and China's messaging largely followed that same line.
Kremlin-linked accounts promoted new evidence to support their conspiracy around U.S.-funded bioweapon labs in Ukraine, though the number of tweets from Russian propagandists with the term “biological” dropped by 58 percent compared to the previous week.
🇨🇳China
Russian propagandists mentioned “China” or “Chinese” in more than 400 tweets as they insisted that Moscow and Beijing’s partnership was growing and amplified Chinese state messengers who criticized NATO and the United States.
Reorienting foreign aid to fight kleptocracy and strategic corruption—corrosive capital, malign influence, and election interference—calls for stronger methods that are more political and coordinated than classic development aid.
Kleptocracies don’t stop at their own borders. The same actors, networks, tactics, and resources that they wield to prevent democracy and rule of law from sprouting at home are also repurposed for foreign aggression.
While cronies and oligarchs get rich in the process, “strategic corruption” is a geopolitical weapon directed by autocratic regimes to undermine the sovereignty of other countries. Its top three manifestations vary in how directly and boldly they subvert democratic processes.
Just yesterday, the US government released its first ever strategy to combat corruption and kleptocracy. And in the last hour, Treasury has released new regulations on beneficial ownership.
Our panelists will break down what this means over the next hour!
"American law firms have really transformed into what I describe as 'first among equals,'" @cjcmichel says, referring to enablers of malign finance. "They're attempting to cloak so much of this under the guise of attorney-client privilege."
What has Taiwan done to effectively push back against info manipulation?
"Taiwan has been a testing ground for CCP information operations since 1949, so it's fair to say we're quite experienced," @pumashen says. He notes the importance of transparency in democratic responses.
"Keeping the Kremlin accountable for their actions publicly has been a strong signal" that the EU is does not condone Russian info ops, @ahonen_anneli says. The EU's cyber sanctions toolbox can be implemented more widely to further deter these malign operations, she explains.