1 of 11) Today, for a change of pace. Some things simply don’t translate, or at least not elegantly. On this day, let’s take a phrase from the ancient Greek, “Χαῖρε, κεχαριτωμένη!”
2) In Luke 1:28, the Angel Gabriel says something to Mary recorded in ancient Greek that doesn’t easily translate. He says “Χαῖρε, κεχαριτωμένη!” – or - "Chaire, kecharitomene!" Chaire means “hail” or “rejoice.” Easy enough. But “kecharitomene” needs more explaining.
3) First, it’s the only place in the Bible the term used in either the Old (Septuagint) or New Testament. The core term of “kecharitomene,” is – κεχαριτω (kharito) - from the word χᾰρῐτόω (kharitóō), but more on that later.
4) “κε-” (ke) at the beginning of the word indicates perfect tense, i.e., the present state of a completed action.
“-μένη” (mene) at the end of the word is a passive participle. Passive: the action is performed on the subject by someone or something else.
5) For example, She is (currently) licensed (by the bar that licensed her back then) to practice law (today).
So, when Gabriel “hailed” Mary, she was in an ongoing perfect (tense) state of a completed action done by someone or something else (passive).
6) χᾰρῐτόω (kharitóō) [en.wiktionary.org/wiki/χαριτόω] “means to show grace to, to bestow favor upon” and in its passive form “to be highly favored, to be shown grace, to have grace or favor shown upon, to be full of grace.”
7) This means that when Gabriel “hailed” Mary, she was already in a perfect state of grace, or completely favored (they had all the grace or favor available) by someone who had already given it to her when giving her the full measure.
8) Hence the full translation should look something like this:
Hail, “(the one who has been already) (fully) graced (by God)” / Hail, “(the one who has been already) (completely) favored (by God)”
9) It turns out that “kecharitomene” packs a lot in one word. Latin requires 2 words to try to capture it, “gratia plena.” English tries with 3, “full of grace.” To minimally capture this in English, it requires 7(9) words, “Full of grace which was given you (from God).”
10) But there is one other thing. Gabriel’s “Chaire, kecharitomene!” is a salutation (“Hail”) followed by a direct address. Direct addresses are usually a name or title of the person who is hailed.
11) Gabriel did not hail Mary by name, but by her title, the one that had already been given her by God. Hence, Kecharitomene should be capitalized. So, what is today? There are other things that don’t translate conveniently. “Daily bread?”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1 of 8) While there is the theological context to Ecclesiastes when saying, “What has been is what will be, and what has been done is what will be done; and there is nothing new under the sun.” Ecclesiastes 1:9
2) The point I would make is that there is nothing “new” or “evolved” about how we think today that couldn’t be - and was - understood in 400 BC. The modern soft-sciences are the deracinating dialectical disease of our time.
3) This is because American culture has been fatally infected with dialectical narratives that have us thinking, a la Hegel, that history moves forward and, because of this, everything thought of or said today is more accurate, true and correct . . .
1 of 11) From the United Nations. Shut up and obey! When speaking of Marxist mass line enforcement narratives, Safa’s short Tweet hits all the buttons. It needs unpacking. It’ll be long.
2) GASLIGHTING: you have no right to an opinion if you’re not a state spokesperson, a state-approved scientist, or a member of the cadre of pundits who enforce mass line narratives.
3) DISCOURSE THEORY: You’re only allowed to listen to state pronouncements and state-approved and MSM/SM promoted “experts.” Other voices will be suppressed. How many qualified, competent scientists and doctors does Safa ignore (because they’ve been silenced)?
1) John's comments are heavily grounded in Church Dogma. When a pope wanders from his basis of authrotiy, when he wants to "shake it up," he is argualbly of base. Pastor Aeternus states the authority always present since Jesus gave Peter the authority in Matthew 16:19. Let's see:
2) From Chapter 4 Paragraph 6 seems to have been written w Francis in mind: "For the Holy Spirit was promised to the successors of Peter not so that they might, by his revelation, make known some new doctrine but that, by his assistance, they might religiously guard . . .
3) . . . and faithfully expound the revelation or deposit of faith transmitted by the apostles."
Then comes Chapter 4, Paragraph 9: “Therefore, faithfully adhering to the tradition received from the beginning of the Christian faith, to the glory of God our savior, . . .
A key takeaway - There ARE people who think this way in high places. Very anti-God, typically Socialist, Mitterrand was. Not new, this sounds just like the Fabian Socialists from turn of last century - George Bernard Shaw or example? H G Wells? Still on mission.
2) From H G Wells: "The men of the New Republic will not be squeamish, either, in facing or inflicting death, because they will have a fuller sense of the possibilities of life than we possess. They will have an ideal that will make killing worthwhile." - Anticipations, 1902.
3) From G B Shaw: “You must all know half a dozen people at least who are no use in this world, who are more trouble than they are worth. Just put them there and say Sir, or Madam, now will you be kind enough to justify your existence? . . .
1) For those who recognize the initiate code (signaling), a dispositive argument can be made that Francis’ 2000 Encyclical Fratelli Futi was a victory lap celebrating the lodges’ victory of the Alta Vendita over the Church.
2) It even signals the French Revolution just like Ratzinger, his refs to 1789, when calling for the raising of the (Church’s) Bastions, Fratelli Futi replaces Catholic theology for that of a movement formally condemned by the Church more than any other.
3) Consider, while Fratelli Futi mentions the Holy Spirit only 3 times, liberty (6), equality (15) and fraternity (55) are mentioned a combined 76 times. In fact, paragraphs 103 to 105 are bundled under a section titled “Liberty, Equality and Fraternity.”
A friend undertook the translated subtitles. I've been planning to put something together on this and will soon. Habermas is second generation Frankfurt School. There is reason to think that this concept was first tried in prototype at Vatican II -
2) I know what you’re thinking: “Vatican II, WT*, that’s a reach, even for you. But consider, it was well known at Vatican II that microphones were turned off for those who opposed the periti and there were other events as well that map with Habermas’ DT.
3) Then, consider that in 2005, Habermas coauthored a book with Cardinal Ratzinger titled THE DIALECTICS OF SECULARIZATION: ON REASON AND RELIGION. In the US, the Jesuit Ignatius Press published it never once suggesting that Habermas was a Marxist.