Possible P3 LAI in Taiwan.
Absolutely not surprising. Exactly the same happened with SARS-1.

There was already one LAI in Beijing in 2020 (not officially reported - once again)

Scientist COVID positive after exposure in Taipei P3 lab | Taiwan News
taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4371080
Taiwan had a SARS-1 Lab Acquired Infection at a military P4 (using gloved P4 cabinets) in 2003.

I wrote about it here.
gillesdemaneuf.medium.com/the-good-the-b…
And the Beijing Institute of Virology which leaked SARS-1 four times in 2004 (one death, 11 cases, cover-up and WHO kicked out of the investigation) had a SARS-CoV-2 lab infection in early 2020.
Not officially reported.
That scientists was working with mice.
taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4371212
Let’s remember that the Wuhan Uni ABSL-3 was working with humanised mice, with the WIV on EcoHealth Alliance funded research.

Would be interesting to check WH03, the 21y old female whose file was created on the 10th Dec 19 by the PLA hospital of central military command.
The GPS coordinate in her sequencing details (ebi.ac.uk/biosamples/sam…) are very close to the Wuhan Uni ABSL-3
Normally a 21y old would be a very mild case. Certainly not one that you would expect to be noticed and diagnosed so early on in an outbreak which supposedly is not yet understood.

Our DRASTIC searchable map has plenty more info.
Feel free to use it: bit.ly/3q5DoSD.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gilles Demaneuf

Gilles Demaneuf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gdemaneuf

11 Dec
This story of a possible Lab Acquired Infection in Taipei is a clear conspiracy theory.

Let's stand against disinformation and politicization of health issues.

@thedeadhandbook @ianbirrell @fastlerner @keverington @R_H_Ebright
taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4371080
Compared to the millions of interactions with bats every year, work in labs concerns only a tiny number of people.

Only conspiracy theorists like the DRASTIC far-right bunch can pretend otherwise. These guys are not scientists.

science.org/content/articl…
In any case Taipei is home to large populations of bats.

Ignore the trumpist rabid conspiracists.
Instead if we want to look at the origins of that latest outbreak in Taipei, we need to urgently sample the bats in the city.

taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3882007
Read 10 tweets
10 Dec
This Global Times reporting about the likely Taiwan Lab Acquired Infection is rather surrealist.

It manages to blame Taiwan for being transparent while never mentioning its own much worse record both in biosafety and in transparency.
globaltimes.cn/page/202112/12…
Let's start by the SARS-CoV-2 Lab Acquired Infection at the Beijing institute of virology in Early 2020.

China - true to form - never reported it. What did you expect?
That's typical - instead of transparency you get a cover up.
'Feng Gao is my 师兄 [partner] in 病毒所 [virology]. We were from the same lab where my former director has now been infected by SARS CoV 2! Very sad but he is doing OK!'

'Yes, he was infected in the lab!'
Read 17 tweets
2 Dec
Read these emails. It’s amazing.

So much for the paper-thin fake consensus published in Lancet and Nature at about the same time.

When we raised exactly the same questions we were called conspiracy theorists.
Time to come clean.
Le Duc:
“If there are weaknesses in your program, now is the time to admit them and get them corrected. I trust that you will take my suggestions in the spirit of one friend trying to help another during a very difficult time.”
That looks exactly like the questions that DRASTIC and the Paris Group have been asking for ages.

Except that we are rabid conspiracy theorists, right?
Read 9 tweets
28 Nov
Good piece by Columbia Prof. Neil L. Harrison.

medium.com/@leftback45/pe…
"Seasoned skeptics wondered how someone with no formal training in virology, and no actual laboratory (EcoHealth has offices, but no labs at its New York City HQ) was swinging such a large bag of research funding."
"There is also a strange and slightly sinister climate of intimidation that hangs around Daszak.
..
Daszak has repeatedly engaged in a PR campaign marked by disinformation, intimidation and distraction.
Read 8 tweets
24 Nov
Goo summary by ⁦@danengber⁩, with one little issue.

The Lab-Leak Theory Meets Its Perfect Match - The Atlantic theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
The odds are not driven by a distance argument but by a location exclusivity argument.

In a well connected world, it is not difficult for a virus to find its way to a perfect place for a superspreader event, be it a Wuhan market or Wuhan itself.
The odds are driven by the location of the initial breakout out of all places, with regards to the putative causative agent.

For wildlife trade zoonosis a market makes perfect sense, but there are 100+ cities in China with wet markets, transport hubs and 1mln+ people.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(