In any case Taipei is home to large populations of bats.
Ignore the trumpist rabid conspiracists.
Instead if we want to look at the origins of that latest outbreak in Taipei, we need to urgently sample the bats in the city.
One Health has been predicting such a zoonotic spillover event for ages.
We should spend more effort rolling out One Health to Taipei instead of being distracted by the silly theories of a bunch of anonymous internet sleuths.
Also just next door to the Academia Sinica P3 lab, there are hiking trails and forests where you are much more likely to come into contact with bats than it a highly safe P3
Then you have various markets within less than 1km from the labs.
That's where we need to go and sample.
And even if we find no infected animal there, it is clear that this is a much more likely source of infection.
First suspect should be the Linsen market, within 1 km form the P3 lab.
It looks very much like a famous market in Wuhan.
They sell meat, fish, dry products. They even have stray animals.
Very suspicious.
Then there is even a COSCO not that far.
Looks very much a famous RT Mart in Wuhan where some Mr Chen got likely infected in early December.
Maybe they even sell lobsters from Maine. It's worth checking and including this in the conclusion of any investigation.
Conspiracy theorists jump on coincidences.
Those anonymous DRASTIC 'sleuths' are a dangerous bunch that should be ignored - they have been fully debunked.
The lab-leak theory is just racist nonsense when there are so many well known zoonosis risks. newrepublic.com/article/164688…
This Global Times reporting about the likely Taiwan Lab Acquired Infection is rather surrealist.
It manages to blame Taiwan for being transparent while never mentioning its own much worse record both in biosafety and in transparency. globaltimes.cn/page/202112/12…
Let's start by the SARS-CoV-2 Lab Acquired Infection at the Beijing institute of virology in Early 2020.
China - true to form - never reported it. What did you expect?
That's typical - instead of transparency you get a cover up.
'Feng Gao is my 师兄 [partner] in 病毒所 [virology]. We were from the same lab where my former director has now been infected by SARS CoV 2! Very sad but he is doing OK!'
And the Beijing Institute of Virology which leaked SARS-1 four times in 2004 (one death, 11 cases, cover-up and WHO kicked out of the investigation) had a SARS-CoV-2 lab infection in early 2020.
Not officially reported.
Le Duc:
“If there are weaknesses in your program, now is the time to admit them and get them corrected. I trust that you will take my suggestions in the spirit of one friend trying to help another during a very difficult time.”
That looks exactly like the questions that DRASTIC and the Paris Group have been asking for ages.
Except that we are rabid conspiracy theorists, right?
"Seasoned skeptics wondered how someone with no formal training in virology, and no actual laboratory (EcoHealth has offices, but no labs at its New York City HQ) was swinging such a large bag of research funding."
"There is also a strange and slightly sinister climate of intimidation that hangs around Daszak.
..
Daszak has repeatedly engaged in a PR campaign marked by disinformation, intimidation and distraction.
The odds are not driven by a distance argument but by a location exclusivity argument.
In a well connected world, it is not difficult for a virus to find its way to a perfect place for a superspreader event, be it a Wuhan market or Wuhan itself.
The odds are driven by the location of the initial breakout out of all places, with regards to the putative causative agent.
For wildlife trade zoonosis a market makes perfect sense, but there are 100+ cities in China with wet markets, transport hubs and 1mln+ people.