Ravi Shastri -- on the first time he got to know Virat Kohli & relationship began to build. (small thread).
I found in Virat the guy with character, game and personality to step into MS’s shoes. He was reeling from that tour of England (2014-15) because he hardly got runs. (1/8)
Virat was in a state of shock the way things had panned out in England. But you could see there was still enough there to get him going. Once he was back on his feet, there would be no looking back. (2/8)
I began watching him very closely. The more closely I saw him, I could see his sense of confidence returning back with each day. Those initial two-three months went in getting to know the team better. (3/8)
We began talking a lot, on various issues – batting techniques, the path forward, lot of things. And I think, it really came to the surface in Australia, when he finally bought into everything we discussed. (4/8)
You could see in him the talent was phenomenal but it is the hunger in Virat that made you sit up and take immediate note. He was absolutely ready to walk that talk – not just in the way he played his game but the way we wanted the team to play. (5/8)
What was that way? A very aggressive style of cricket, in your face cricket, where you were never out there to please others. The whole focus was to do whatever it takes, do whatever is right, within the laws of the game, to win. (6/8)
He set the bar really high on that tour, got four centuries and a fifty. We lost that series 2-0 but I still remember Alan Border walking up to me at the end of the series in Sydney and said.... (7/8)
“Rav, well done man. Not many teams bat out the last day to save Test matches at the colosseums, which is Melbourne and Sydney".
That summed it up. It was the beginning of a friendship between a coach and captain. (8/8)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#Thread
Bellerive Oval in Hobart won the tender to host the 5th Ashes Test – day & night affair. Hobart last hosted a Test in 2016 when Australia lost to South Africa by innings & 80-odd runs. There’s an extremely interesting element in this development. Let me explain. (1/25)
In between resistance from Western Australia to host the Test at Perth – a traditional venue, and the luring idea of allotting a ‘2nd Test’ to either MCG or SCG, the colosseums that guarantee revenues, Cricket Australia floated a tender for interested states to bid. (2/25)
Tasmanian Cricket had been at loggerheads with CA recently over the sacking Tim Paine – a Tasmanian himself. There had been much furore because Tasmanian cricket fraternity insisted Paine was cleared of wrongdoing in 2018. They invoked Bill Lawry from over 50 yrs ago. (3/25)
Since Indian cricket #captaincy is in such heavy discussion, here’s a blast from the past – a #thread on developments that took place 16 years ago & what BCCI, Virat & the media can learn from it after all these years. (1/27)
Mind you, I was a very junior reporter back then. This thread explains the amount of controversy Indian cricket witnessed during those years -- Ganguly's sacking as captain / player, Dravid’s unfortunate stint as captain, & Ganguly comeback. A tale of twists, plots & grit. (2/27)
Some very Sr journalists, who are on Twitter now, tracked those controversies. I’ll be happy if they contribute here. Also, I don’t know if I’ll be able to do justice in just one thread and with all facts… but will try. Also, this has no link to present controversies : ) (3/27)
The more I listen to discussions around Ajinkya Rahane ahead of the Wankhede Test, the more I realize these discussions eventually boil down to just two questions:
* Will Ajinkya Rahane play?
* Should Ajinkya Rahane play?
So, here’s a #thread on the man… (1/25)
Let’s deal with the first question: Will Ajinkya Rahane play? -->> I don’t see him in the XI.
Reason? 1) Virat is back; 2) Shreyas can’t be dropped; 3) Shubhman did well; 4) Mayank can’t be forced to make way for a makeshift opener. (2/25)
Any other option? Make Rahane himself open? But is that a solution? Tomorrow, when Rohit and Rahul come back what happens? Anyways, this is stretching a bit too much. So, getting to the point... If Rahane has to play, decision will have to defy logic. (3/25)
The IPL retention money has already been discussed but this is my take... small #thread
Technically, if four capped players are retained, Rs 42 cr must get deducted from franchise's salary purse; If three capped players are retained: Rs 33 cr; Two: Rs 24 cr; One: Rs 14 cr. (1/8)
Now, MI have retained four capped players at Rs 16 cr (Rohit), Rs 12 cr (Bumrah), Rs 8 cr (Surya) and Rs 6 cr (Pollard) respectively and Rs 42 cr will be deducted from the purse. However, some franchises have followed a different policy. (2/8)
Talk about innovating and making most of the rules. There are franchises who don't mind if money is blocked from their salary purse before going into the auction because they can still save money if they can come to an arrangement with players. (3/8)
So, retention lists are final & I didn't all names right. Mumbai Indians picked Suryakumar & not Ishan and I'm sure they have very good reasons for it. In this #thread let's look at what could've possibly made each franchise arrive at decisions they did. Just follow the thread.
Rohit, Boom & Pollard were in. Question was who's 4th. I thought Ishan provided 2 options -- batting & keeper. But MI made the difficult decision to go with Sky because he provides a solid base in middle order. Rohit at top, SKY in middle, Polly to finish, Boom to lead attack.
MI can now build their squad around these 4 trusted hands. They had to let go of Hardik -- their home grown talent -- and it must be hurting. So many successes. But again, Hardik has to work on his bowling and come back because that's what makes him special -- the allrounder tag.
Technically, deadline to submit list of retained players is around 8.30-9 pm. Who knows -- there could still be last-minute stitching of a deal?Once lists are submitted, there's a tv show scheduled at around 9.30 pm. (1/15)
But here's what I was generally thinking: Franchises who have worked for years on setting up their own robust ecosystems have to now suddenly let go of homegrown players. How unfair is that!
Mumbai Indians, for example, can choose only one betwn Hardik, Surya and Ishan. (2/15)
Look at Chennai Super Kings. Even for sake of posterity they can't hold back Faf du Plessis -- their MVP this yr. As much as they'd like to hold back Shardul Thakur, there's no space.
What does this all mean? Those years of investing in a good team amount to nothing? (3/15)