the way the internet has privatized & monetized queer sex has stopped lots of u from understanding the scope & scale of public policing of queer sex. like u r ALLOWED by the same policing apparatuses to ogle porn in private that visits violence upon poor ppl for fucking in public
idg how ppl don't realize, like notice how esp women whose OF's/internet SW accounts get made public are ostracized & fired from their jobs or even put on sex offender registries cuz ppl non-consensually "exposed" other ppl to their SW. how far are you from being made public?
how far r u from being made houseless & having nowhere else to have sex or any intimacy? how far r u from the corner? & how far are you from the social precarity that these places signify: the policing & criminalization & the pathologization that grants u a feeling of superiority
for me this overlaps w arguments arnd class, cuz the "get a room" response, at times tells me that most of y'all rlly think your class position is so secure that you could never end up on the street--which is statistically, & variably naive. this should be in your "class analysis
& should def be part of your abolitionist politics. reverting to a legalistic definition of self-posession "well what abt ME being 'exposed' to them is rlly not far from the way rich ppl & the housed talk abt houseless ppl living & going to the bathroom outside, think abt this

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 💃🏾SRS-One 🐙🏴☭

💃🏾SRS-One 🐙🏴☭ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jemmaisOKeh

8 Dec
the "black cis men are a marginalized gender" (cuz they aren't yt cis men) takes have in true neoliberal fashion appropriated radical critique; centering the privileged in the discourse of the oppressed. it's resubmitting black trans/queer/feminist critique to the Moynihan Report
the Moynihan report is rooted in this same racist patriarchal cissexist western bourgeoisie ambivalence of yt manhood as both realized & yet henpecked/hampered by the industrial normative family structure/gender relations & "black manhood" is a trickle down "failure" of this
like the more radical black trans/queer/feminist critique was not critiquing the family structure nor its attendant gender & gender relations from a cite of mourning or comparison or a desire for inclusion. they argued we can, must & in deed have done things differently
Read 7 tweets
30 Jan
why do articles like this keep throwing black TW under the bus?

centering cis ppl's abject definition of trans as the audience for validating your transness IS a reification of the authority of cisness, which by definition constructs the gender binary

wearyourvoicemag.com/gendering-unge…
"So many ppl have internalized the idea that transness is defined first, always, and only by accumulated death."

specify that this is cis ppl & stop acting like black trans women are lording our deaths over you as a neoliberal social identity category & not a material reality
"ppl grow comfortable w being transphobic towards nonbinary ppl because the violence transgressed against our bodies has not yet been directly translated to death"

how do u know murdered black TW aren't non-binary? this is a weird speaking for the subaltern assumption to make
Read 9 tweets
27 Jan
this "article" perfectly performs the kind of transmisogyny hella non-binary ppl enact in the Bay against Black TW. ppl who r less marginalized claim they're being excluded from (often non-existent social spaces, like what trans (feminine) social space?) hunterthelion.medium.com/transness-does…
not being "validated" by other trans ppl (which almost always refers to trans women)--it's probably going to be the next official TERF dog whistle btw. is not & does not carry the same weight as the abject murderous state & private violence this "author" compares it to. GROSS!
it's so fucking gross to see someone use black trans women's abjection, murder, loss, lack of a social, lack of ability to (collectively grieve) our constant loss of a social, to complain about their gender expression not being "validated" by ppl who have no social power to do so
Read 8 tweets
18 Jan
6 months of stealth dating & i gotta say it's nice to not get "good for you/i rlly like your make-up/well look at you/yass sis" messages from cis women & non-men & to experience ppl just being fucking normal to you & not treating you like an abjection/pity fetish or easy sex. its
also nice to avoid dates w ppl who are "gender curious" ie ppl who clearly want to take you out just to project a lot onto & extract a lot from your transness ("so like when did you know...yeah I wore pants once too & 🤯...wow you're so brave") (a kind of chaser?)...buuuuut
idk how girls do this long-term (i understand w men the potential for (some) safety). i imagine cuz heterosexuality is already rooted in gender antagonism it's not hard to date men w the expectation that you'll never possess shared experiences of gender or being in the world, but
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(