this seems so profoundly deluded…can Israel intel be that bad? or nyt so gullible for believing it?
“Some Israeli officials believe that their sabotage campaign is having strategic effects and could be one of the reasons Iranians, however tentatively, have returned to Vienna.”
“Some Israeli officials believe that their sabotage campaign is having strategic effects and could be one of the reasons Iranians, however tentatively, have returned to Vienna.”
https://twitter.com/nick_l_miller/status/1469490462583148547
there are so many people who have contact with Iranian officials. how can Israel intel act like they are studying a country from five hundred years ago? i assume they know better. so what reporter would believe this garbage?
Note the incoherence. Israel intel allegedly saying maybe its sabotage convinced Iran to return to negotiations Iran always said returning to about an agreement it did not leave. In a story about Israeli officials frustrated because they do not want a deal. they want war
think it is a plausible theory that one of the goals of some of the (alleged Israeli sabotage) operations was to try to prevent a deal. to disrupt IAEA Iran ops, etc.
just before talks resumed in april 2021, israel sabotage attack. nytimes.com/2021/04/15/wor…
“The explosion at Natanz struck barely a week after the US and Iran…participated in the new talks in Vienna aimed at reviving the nuclear agreement abandoned by Trump” NYT april 11, 2021. nytimes.com/2021/04/11/wor…
“In the meetings this week, Israeli officials tried to persuade Washington not to work toward a diplomatic agreement and to instead tighten sanctions.”
The Israeli position seems a dead end and at odds with some of their own national security assessments.
The Israeli position seems a dead end and at odds with some of their own national security assessments.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
