Of the roughly 30,000 active juvenile missing persons cases at the end of last year, virtually all will have returned safely home by now.

Only a vanishingly small number of children go missing & stay missing, but Q people want you to THINK vast hordes of kids just vanish. (1/4)
They don’t, and if you want to *prove* they don’t, you shouldn’t just use statistics.

You should ask a follow-up question: do the Q people’s claims describe the actual world that we live in?

The most common number they throw out there is 700K missing kids a year.
I did the math, using population information from the Trump administration, and if there were 700K kids going & *staying* missing every year,

one out of every 25 kids would just vanish before turning 18.

*Do* they?

Everyone would know several pairs of grieving parents. Do we?
Most classes in school would have a missing student. Every church would be filled with parents who had lost a child.

Is any of that true?

Does a single word of it match up with observable reality?

It’s good to ask this aloud, to stop bystanders from being swayed by the lies.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Q Origins Project

The Q Origins Project Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @QOrigins

14 Dec
ATTENTION, DEMOCRATIC PARTY OFFICIALS & FUNCTIONARIES:

The only weapon that consistently works against disinfo is pre-bunking, or inoculation.

Telling people they're going to be lied to, and how, and why, makes them resist the lie.

Use that knowledge for 2022 & '24. Start now.
But don't JUST say Republicans are going to scream fraud if Trump loses.

Say: Republicans are going to scream fraud if Trump loses, and try to certify slates of electors that *ignore the real electoral results.*

Say: this will be an assault on democracy, on YOUR way of life...
and when they try this (and they WILL try it), we have to be ready for mass protests like the ones that brought down the Soviet Bloc in '89.

We have to be ready to fill the streets and shut down ordinary civic life.

Prep people with the knowledge of what the bad guys will say.
Read 4 tweets
10 Dec
“The pdf that’s floating around” is, of course, the coup PowerPoint.

.pps is an ooooold PowerPoint format, and someone we consulted last night suggested that it may not have been saved that way for compatibility on an archaeo-machine — some *printers* need old formats, too.
But it’s pretty unusual to encounter that format in 2021, which could be a clue to whose hands the PowerPoint passed through.

*However*, the pdf version of this file was MUCH more widely distributed than the PowerPoint. (Big ups to @z3dster for also finding the pps, by the way.)
The pdf was out in the wild on January 12, 2021, when it was released on at least the Telegram channels for:

* Lin Wood, an attorney who was heavily involved in trying to overturn the election, and

* Arizona “audit” figure Jovan Hutton Pulitzer.

What does this mean?
Read 21 tweets
9 Dec
I often mention the December 18, 2020 meeting where Sidney Powell, Michael Flynn, & Patrick Byrne (the Overstock dot com guy) swept into the White House uninvited & ambled into Trump’s office, then tried to convince him to have the military “re-run” the election.

🧵 w/excerpts:
“But Origins,” you say, “surely you’re not JUST relying on Patrick Byrne’s word!”

I am not. It was covered amply by the real media.

CNN, for instance:

amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/12/19…
The Guardian, complete with Mitt Romney’s reaction:

amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/d…
Read 9 tweets
9 Dec
ASOG and Phil Waldron are names you know if you’ve followed @get_innocuous.

If you haven’t: ASOG is a firm that makes its living telling failed Republican candidates — many who lost in primaries, some that lost in general elections — that they lost bc of fraud.

Waldron is scum.
Anyway, read the thread to see how these people — many of whom were and *are* instrumental in Stop the Steal bullshit — wanted to do a coup to ignore the election results with the help of SCOTUS and Pence.

This document was *in the hands of the White House Chief of Staff.*
Note that this “re-run the election” idea is fairly similar to what Sidney Powell and Mike Flynn pitched in the White House meeting with Trump on December 18.

Why would that be attractive to the Trump camp? Two reasons — first, obviously, Trump lost and they wanted a do-over.
Read 6 tweets
6 Dec
Summing up this story from @schotthappens:

1. Stolen-election cranks in Utah, some of them armed, are going door to door to record people without their consent while they ask questions about the election

2. This is part of a national effort. 🙃 read it:

sltrib.com/news/politics/…
In particular, read far enough to hit the quotes by @holden, explaining how “election fraud affidavits” work as a strategy for the Stop the Steal crowd— they let you take low-quality “evidence,” like (real example!) “I saw a mixed-race couple mail a large item while laughing”…
and turn it into an “affidavit” which the Stop the Steal crowd can cite as “evidence of voter fraud” through the simple expedient of just… writing the bullshit down and getting the author and a notary to sign it.

After that, it sounds all official & serious: ooh, an affidavit!
Read 8 tweets
4 Dec
After talking it over w/Trapezoid, my stance on Hunter's laptop is:

1. Probably at least one email address or device of Hunter's really was compromised

2. Whoever provided the data to Rudy & co may have added forged items -- the Russians, e.g., did this w/Macronleaks in 2017...
and

3. Some of the Definitely Real Hunter Biden Emails I've seen floating around, in my judgment, *are* probably forgeries. Pretty crude ones at that!

This, for example, is just... not at all how humans talk, but it IS a bunch of red meat for GOP'ers who wanna gin up a scandal. Image
That said,

4. Some of the items will probably be genuine too (in Macronleaks a LOT of items were genuine -- and boring -- while a few hand-crafted fakes were meant to lob a grenade into the French election right before people went to the polls).
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(