We now know that because COVID spreads through the air rather than by fomites, good ventilation is crucial indoors in the winter. We knew this a year ago. Why don't we now have units for hospitals, schools and hospitals that circulate air and pass it through sterilising UV light?
Why have we not done more to investigate ongoing indoor disinfection with Far UV light? And why don't we have therapeutic treatments to roll out? We developed vaccines in the blink of an eye. Then stopped. If the government thinks this is important enough to abrogate freedoms...
...and shutter the economy, why has it not built on the success of the vaccine programme to develop ways to mitigate the spread and reduce the CFR? We *knew* COVID would be endemic. We *knew* there would be new variants. We've had plenty of time to prepare. It's gross malfeasance
This is the attitude about the British state about almost everything. There's an inertia and a can't-do malaise that pervades the whole infrastructure, from number ten, through the cabinet office, down through the civil service, right to individual hospital wards and schoolrooms.
The vaccine taskforce was literally world leading. Better than the much called Chinese techno-autarchy; better than the much better resourced US Operation Warp Speed; and certainly better than the predictably leaden, semi-corrupt EU effort. So why, knowing that COVID would...
...be endemic, and knowing it spread aerially, did we not set up two more task forces of the same structure in December 2020 (i.e. once the vaccine had crossed the final hurdle), one with the goal of developing a therapeutic cheap enough to mass-distribute that would bring the...
...the CFR of any COVID case down to seasonal flu levels (that is, reduce death by 80-90%), and a second tasked with the goal to developing internal ventilation and sterilization systems to bring indoor spread down to outdoor spread levels? Given the cost of even minor...
...economic restrictions, and the cost of lost NHS capacity and school time, the money spent would have been superb value for money, even before we get to the profit from selling on the successes. By now, we could and should be laughing in the face is Omicron.
Now, perhaps you are reading this thinking that it's ridiculous, and Omicron, or even Delta, *is* seasonal flu. But my point is that *the government* doesn't think like that. *They* think it's important enough to shut down the economy and abrogate freedoms. And yet they're...
...scrambling around as though they're shocked that when the weather gets cold a respiratory disease spreads faster; and acting as though they're shocked that a new variant has emerged, even though research has shown there was plenty of genetic room for the virus to improve.
It's pathetic. It's further proof that the UK is the worst administered state in the developed world. It feels like late-communist Eastern Europe, where the bureaucracy pretended to work, and the people pretended to believe they were efficient. We cannot continue like this.
Adding to this, does anybody seriously think that the state bureaucracy has learned and internalised the lessons from the COVID debacle, and taken steps to improve disaster response? If COVID was only a little less virulent or a little less transmissible, it would be seasonal...
...flu. Chances are that we won't be so lucky with the next emergent disease. Have they looked to address the failures from this time, and applief the new science we have (vaccine production, genomic sequencing and disease monitoring) to a new plan designed for the social...
...media world? What about the chances of a Carrington Event? Have they a plan to start right now hardening key infrastructure and the national grid against such a prospect now? What about nuclear war, given the US and China are increasingly on the edge of war in the Western...
...Pacific? Given how they *knew* there would be logistics dislocations and supply demand mismatches in the COVID recovery period, and yet we will caught with their pants down by the gas shortage and price spike, I'll bet all the money in all the pockets of everybody reading...
...this thread that the answer to that question is no. And therefore, when the next global disaster hits, the government of the time and civil service will be running around Whitehall and Downing Street like startled hens while in public claiming that nobody could've foreseen...
...such an event, and appealing to the Blitz Spirit.

The pandemic was entirely foreseeable, and we were unprepared. But even after the pandemic, and knowing of events coming our way -- winter increase in transmissibility, new variants, logistics issues -- we haven't planned.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Collingwood 🇬🇧

Collingwood 🇬🇧 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @admcollingwood

14 Dec
Babies, I once heard a psychologist say half in jest, are all sociopaths. They think the world revolves around them, have no idea their actions can hurt others, and manipulate emotions to get their way. They must be socialised out of this, and crucially told 'No': The world....
...does not revolve around them, they cannot always get what they want, and they must learn to consider the needs, wants and feelings of others. Parents who do not do this find their lives revolving around little tyrants, who throw tantrums every time something doesn't go...
...their way, and show little gratitude when things do. As a society, we have raised a generation in which about 25% (about half of those who attend university) are babyish, sociopathic tyrants. I am afraid they are going to have to be told No very firmly indeed. This...
Read 6 tweets
12 Dec
Thread🧵

+++A THOUGHT EXPERIMENT TO PROVE THAT A VOTE FOR A SMALL PARTY ISN'T WASTED+++

Let's imagine an election in which the public is so angry with the government, and so disillusioned with the opposition's ability to do anything different, that hardly anybody bothers...1/n
...voting. In fact, in our hypothetical election, only the million and a half or so people who are actually members of a political party vote. The election's turnout is therefore only ~3%. Whoever won would have no legitimacy and couldn't claim a democratic mandate. But... 2/n
...more importantly, such a low turnout -- nothing less than a voters' strike -- would be a message that hit Whitehall and Westminster like a thunder clap. Peter Hitchens has often made this point. He has argued that all ballot papers should have a 'none of the above'...3/n
Read 9 tweets
24 Sep
People asked why businesses don't train HGV drivers. Answer? The 'Conservative' Party. It always capitulates to business, who will never invest in training or higher wages, as they can scream 'Shortage!' at any time and have borders opened. Migration reform is finished.

1/n
Why? Because every other industry will have learned the lesson from this HGV debacle. Instead of investing to solve the problem (with higher wages, training, staff retention schemes, productivity improvements), they know they can simply get articles in the newspapers to...

2/n
...create panic (the Telegraph is sympathetic to business, and the Guardian to open borders, so they can work both ends). Businesses now know the government will always back down in the game of chicken. Every time wages look set to rise, they'll flood the market with labour.

3/n
Read 4 tweets
17 Sep
Those who think that the AUKUS Security/Nuclear sub deal has left France hard done by -- yes, it has. But few nations play quite as tough as France on arms deals or pursuing its interests diplomatically. This has affected Britain historically and recently...(1/n)

🇨🇵⤵️
From my memory:

--Kept Britain out of the EU twice (DeGaulle) which laid the foundation for us to join on horrible terms.

--Withdrew from the Eurofighter programme (which eventually produced the Typhoon) to pursue its own version (which eventually became the Rafael) and...(2/n)
...compete directly with us on the export market (and successfully, too)

--Refused, despite being a 'security partner', to give us access to the Galileo GPS system, when we had contributed hugely.

--Threatened to cut off our electricity several times during brexit...(3/n)
Read 5 tweets
29 Jul
(1/n) The more I think about it, the more I think that war between the US and China is coming. It's too Black Swanish for people to assign the proper likelihood. But it's not a Black Swan (it's entirely predictable); it's just black, so nobody wants to think about it properly.
(2/n) China is presently doing the equivalent of Thatcher stockpiling coal before the miner's strike of 84-85. It's making sure it's got all its ducks in a row, and that it cannot be defeated through the back door while winning militarily. The increase of ICBM silos is a way ...
(3/n)...to make sure that a US first strike cannot win a nuclear war, and to raise the cost of the US going nuclear should they lose a conventional war (which is a sign of Chinese confidence). A key indicator of China preparing would be the mobilisation of private industry...
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(