Babies, I once heard a psychologist say half in jest, are all sociopaths. They think the world revolves around them, have no idea their actions can hurt others, and manipulate emotions to get their way. They must be socialised out of this, and crucially told 'No': The world....
...does not revolve around them, they cannot always get what they want, and they must learn to consider the needs, wants and feelings of others. Parents who do not do this find their lives revolving around little tyrants, who throw tantrums every time something doesn't go...
...their way, and show little gratitude when things do. As a society, we have raised a generation in which about 25% (about half of those who attend university) are babyish, sociopathic tyrants. I am afraid they are going to have to be told No very firmly indeed. This...
...will be painful, because they have been indulged for far too long, and like any spoiled child, it's much harder to knock sense into them after the rot has set in than it would have been to guide them wisely to begin with. But it must be done, and we must hold firm before...
...the inevitable foot stomping and bawling that saying No will trigger. But No they must be told. They should be informed that anybody on rent strike will be evicted as soon as the law allows Mr Liddle should be invited back to the university. They should be told that...
...agitating for staff to be sacked for holding different opinions is unacceptable, and may lead to disciplinary action. These privileged, emotionally stunted little tyrants must be taught that the world doesn't revolve around them and to be civil to those with whom they disagree
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
+++A THOUGHT EXPERIMENT TO PROVE THAT A VOTE FOR A SMALL PARTY ISN'T WASTED+++
Let's imagine an election in which the public is so angry with the government, and so disillusioned with the opposition's ability to do anything different, that hardly anybody bothers...1/n
...voting. In fact, in our hypothetical election, only the million and a half or so people who are actually members of a political party vote. The election's turnout is therefore only ~3%. Whoever won would have no legitimacy and couldn't claim a democratic mandate. But... 2/n
...more importantly, such a low turnout -- nothing less than a voters' strike -- would be a message that hit Whitehall and Westminster like a thunder clap. Peter Hitchens has often made this point. He has argued that all ballot papers should have a 'none of the above'...3/n
We now know that because COVID spreads through the air rather than by fomites, good ventilation is crucial indoors in the winter. We knew this a year ago. Why don't we now have units for hospitals, schools and hospitals that circulate air and pass it through sterilising UV light?
Why have we not done more to investigate ongoing indoor disinfection with Far UV light? And why don't we have therapeutic treatments to roll out? We developed vaccines in the blink of an eye. Then stopped. If the government thinks this is important enough to abrogate freedoms...
...and shutter the economy, why has it not built on the success of the vaccine programme to develop ways to mitigate the spread and reduce the CFR? We *knew* COVID would be endemic. We *knew* there would be new variants. We've had plenty of time to prepare. It's gross malfeasance
Given the results of the below poll, the Spaces on Ukraine will be tonight at 8:30pm. I'll first attempt to tell the story behind the dispute, starting 30yrs ago, and explain the geopolitical forces at play. Then I'll ask contributions and we'll start the chat.
People asked why businesses don't train HGV drivers. Answer? The 'Conservative' Party. It always capitulates to business, who will never invest in training or higher wages, as they can scream 'Shortage!' at any time and have borders opened. Migration reform is finished.
Why? Because every other industry will have learned the lesson from this HGV debacle. Instead of investing to solve the problem (with higher wages, training, staff retention schemes, productivity improvements), they know they can simply get articles in the newspapers to...
2/n
...create panic (the Telegraph is sympathetic to business, and the Guardian to open borders, so they can work both ends). Businesses now know the government will always back down in the game of chicken. Every time wages look set to rise, they'll flood the market with labour.
3/n
Those who think that the AUKUS Security/Nuclear sub deal has left France hard done by -- yes, it has. But few nations play quite as tough as France on arms deals or pursuing its interests diplomatically. This has affected Britain historically and recently...(1/n)
🇨🇵⤵️
From my memory:
--Kept Britain out of the EU twice (DeGaulle) which laid the foundation for us to join on horrible terms.
--Withdrew from the Eurofighter programme (which eventually produced the Typhoon) to pursue its own version (which eventually became the Rafael) and...(2/n)
...compete directly with us on the export market (and successfully, too)
--Refused, despite being a 'security partner', to give us access to the Galileo GPS system, when we had contributed hugely.
--Threatened to cut off our electricity several times during brexit...(3/n)
(1/n) The more I think about it, the more I think that war between the US and China is coming. It's too Black Swanish for people to assign the proper likelihood. But it's not a Black Swan (it's entirely predictable); it's just black, so nobody wants to think about it properly.
(2/n) China is presently doing the equivalent of Thatcher stockpiling coal before the miner's strike of 84-85. It's making sure it's got all its ducks in a row, and that it cannot be defeated through the back door while winning militarily. The increase of ICBM silos is a way ...
(3/n)...to make sure that a US first strike cannot win a nuclear war, and to raise the cost of the US going nuclear should they lose a conventional war (which is a sign of Chinese confidence). A key indicator of China preparing would be the mobilisation of private industry...