Hedging 101
Tl;dr
-Diversify
-If that doesn't suit you use options passively
-If you think you can actively hedge at the right time then you have alpha (you probably don't)
-If you hedge during an event you are better off dumping your portfolio cuz your already dead
Hedging a portfolio is a reasonable idea. It is designed to limit downside at the expense of upside. It is a natural desire to make sure your portfolio has a worst case outcome. It lets you "sleep at night" However how and when one hedge has big impact on long term return.
The first point I would like to make is that assets have a risk premium which provides long term excess return over cash. Investing in assets is essentially the only free lunch in markets. When you hedge you are eliminating some of the risk of your portfolio
The hedge provider takes on that risk and is paid some or potentially all of your risk premium.
The best way to have your free lunch and eat it too. Is to have a portfolio that performs well in all environments. The best way to harvest risk premium while minimizing risk is through the magic of diversification. At Bridgewater they called that portfolio All Weather
60/40 is a classic option. Harold Browne called his the Permanent Porfolio. Others call it risk parity. Choosing any of these is the best way to "Hedge" your portfolio. It costs nothing and reduces your risk
But this thread is about hedging. "Andy should I buy puts today?" I see how investing in assets with a systematic put purchasing program makes sense. It has costs but creating a less sloped hockey stick pattern to your investment portfolio outcomes is reasonable
If you want such a payoff pattern plan ahead and passively buy puts over some regular schedule. I think for most investors that means 6 month options rolled quarterly. I would time your portfolio rebalances and tax planning for that day and do it regardless of what's happening.
Passively hedging will minimize the cost through time and maintain your desired future return profile of you portfolio however it will come at a cost. Put options and for that matter any volatility product have a negative expected return vs cash because the buyer transfers
Risk from himself to the seller. That means that when you buy puts you transfer some of the free money of risk premium collection to the seller. It is critical to recognize that downside protection comes at a meaningful cost. OTM puts trade at a massive premium to OTM calls
The reasons for skew are many (good thread topic) but one is most certainly the fact that equities have a large risk premium and a lot of the perceived risk in an equity investment is drawdown risk and supply and demand reflects the need for people to "hedge"
So given skew my work has shown that a passive purchasing of put options eliminates a significant portion of the risk premium collected from holding equities. A passive portfolio of equities and a put purchase strategy does out perform cash and so some risk premium remains
But it's not much. I for one prefer the portfolio diversification method vs the put program. But wait. "Andy, what if I time the put purchases". Well if you can time put purchase and offset or eliminate the cost, you have alpha! Congratulations. You win the game of investing.
Two things. 1. What is your alpha? Is it the skill of predicting both delta and IV in a way that results in using put options to express the alpha optimally? Or is it market timing levels of the equity market. Or is it volatility forecasting. Make sure you know because that
Can guide what you do. If you have no alpha in vol. but a ton in price don't bother with options just lighten your equity exposure with low transaction cost linear product.
2. Do you actually have alpha. My guess is you don't. It's super hard and you will likely pay out transaction costs and have a negative expected return from your market timing activities particularly if you use high transaction cost product like OTM options
Lastly. Never ever hedge using options during an event. Transaction cost rise dramatically. If you buy puts when others are being forced to buy puts you are in for a bad experience. Plan ahead. Don't have a portfolio that forces you to hedge.
Perhaps you believe that purchasing puts during an event is a good idea because events last longer or this one is differ my or whatever. That's alpha! You probably don't have alpha. During such events the sharks smell blood. If you are trading it's probably yours. Ken, Thomas
and Jeff are Billionaires for a reason. If you don't know who Ken, Thomas, and Jeff are, you definitely don't have alpha! If you feel like you must reduce risk into a panic you haven't planned ahead. Perhaps you should take your portfolio to cash
It's a cheap means of risk management at that time when options are super high cost to trade and it would allow you to rethink how you invest. I hope this doesn't happen to you and you.
Plan ahead
Diversify
Invest passively including possibly a passive put purchase program
Know with certainty whether you have alpha (you don't)
By doing these things you can avoid diving into shark infested waters.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How the JHEQX roll works 101. I am writing this because I want to bookmark it so I can copy the link to those who think the roll has no market impact because "It's traded delta neutral" While this is 💯 true that the other side of the JHEQX collar is handed a delta neutral trade
That doesn't mean that @JPMorganAM doesn't have market impact in setting up the trade.
There are two possible states to consider regarding the old collar at expiration and one corner case state that I won't clutter this thread discussing
Number 1 macro misunderstanding 101 - a short thread. When tweeting about tax selling I noticed a number of my followers making a basic mistake in their questions and comments. It's extremely common. Simply put when someone decides to sell a stock for any reason
They demand someone else who may not have had any interest in the stock to either use available cash or leverage and raise cash to buy the shares. Typically the motivated seller is more "inelastic" than the buyer. For instance tax selling results in selling motivated by
The sellers specific basis and is almost orthogonal to the "value" of the stock. The seller pays a concession to the buyer. So I get it. What if buyers are highly elastic and topped up on their risk and begin to demand a larger and larger concession. Well prices fall.
Challenging times for Fed dual mandate 101. This thread discusses what policy is appropriate for stagflation. Tl;dr that answer is easy if true stagflation is present. If it's the mild and or transitory kind then the Fed should do exactly what they are doing and react if
Persistent high inflation with below trend growth occurs. When inflation expectations are set as far as the eye can see at 2.5% the Fed does not have a problem. Inflationistas can scream all they want about the current high inflation and how it is not going to be transitory but
the Fed deals with real problems that are actually happening or are certain to happen in the near future. Stagflation doesn't matter exist at the moment. Paul Volcker would bust a gut if he read the stuff people are saying about stagflation today. Stepping back.
Equity valuation 101 - Firstly even if you know with certainty the "Fair value" of an equity or equity index or for that matter any asset or any relationship between assets the path to convergence to FV is rocky. I spent decades in the RV space before learning macro and have ...
Traded many absolute and statistical arbitrage relationships. Convergence to FV for many of these strategies often depended on macro conditions. This generated track records that often were simply levered beta with bad drawdowns and expensive transaction costs and fees.
The path to convergence generated p/l volatility which impacted risk adjusted returns. The returns from knowing FV just don't compensate investors for the risk significantly more than owning a passive beta portfolio. Tl;dr alpha is hard to get.
Santa and 2nd order effects.
I sent a thread about the real world causation of the Santa clause rally. The tl;dr is that in years that have 10% gains by 11/1 the market rallies through year end caused by performance chasing and less selling to defer taxes. One level down..
I want to talk about a level below the macro and shed light on my no touch tweets lately. In Q4 gains are not crystallized to avoid paying for taxes and active managers tend to chase the outperformers. However tax loss harvesting is a thing that does happen
That selling of underperforms is smaller than the macro buying of the Santa Claus effect and fuels the so called January effect where underperformers outperform.
$TSLA block 101
20BN for sale where the seller can adjust the order pace and price but must get done. The seller must provide direct information with a two day lag which is then available to all. The size is large but many investors are focusing on the flow.
We all know about the order now. But we just don't know anything about the order of except its remaining size and eventual completion date by either yearend for tax purposes or august 2022 for options expiry reasons.
That leads to a few questions. 1. Does the paper 10b-5.1 have any info? 2. Is end of year a tax deadline?