1/ $66M Because the Liberals didn't foresee more pandemic leave being needed?
Bizarre🤔A special appropriations determination that is exempt from parliamentary scrutiny (can't be disallowed) was raised last Saturday.
It goes to the NRRA who have $200M+ in unspent money. #Auspol
2/ The explanatory memorandum has some clues;
👉to do this, the money must be "Urgent" & "unforeseen" (or from error)
👉It's for the $1,500 Pandemic Leave payments
👉$66M allows for 44K payments
👉They only budgeted $12.6M because of Delta.
👉They only realised last week.
3/ The NRRA new & has attracted scandals from the beginning
Liberals gave Liberals mate Shane Stone $617K salary as Chair of this new agency.
Asked about his appointment in estimates Mr Stone said he was informed by “the Prime Minister’s office by one of the very senior advisers”
4/ Many questions are begging to be asked.
🤔How can the government have expected COVID would not be causing people to isolate & quarantine from October 2021. Perhaps they were expecting people to keep going to work with COVID #Auspol
5/ 🤔Why has no press release been put out explaining this unusual and urgent appropriation of $66M
🤔Why was this so urgent & vital that parliament was bypassed and have the determination made without provision to disallow.
6/ 🤔Why did it take until December 2021 to realise they were needing another $66M.
🤔If people taking leave because of COVID was not planned for, what else have they forgotten?
🧵1/ NDIS, some facts to help with the "Blame NDIS" deflect and distract talking points.
I had wanted to do a comprehensive NDIS thread, instead I'll post this as MYEFO is out tomorrow and 'leaks' to News Corp have begun already.
2/ When Labor was developing NDIS it was fully costed. The initial productivity commission work was revalidated by the government actuary (to appease the Liberals). The table below is from the actuaries report showing $22B cost in 18/19.
So costs were known
3/ More than known, the Liberals made a point of saying the big bad number in their parliamentary speeches.
The costs in 18/19 were lower than forecast, but this was because of liberal incompetence making the rollout go slowly AND then used to create the 'back in black' surplus
1/Re: Leaked Text- 🐂💩 & a Dumpster Fire
Here is my dismantling of @CroweDM illogical propaganda piece.
🔥Dumpster Fire
A. Australia has now leaked text messages from the French President. How is leaking confidential text msgs going 2 help restor trust. theage.com.au/politics/feder…
2/ B. Nothing in the text messages proves Emmanual Macron was not telling the truth. The selective leaking invites speculation by the reader to assume a contract (for what we don't know) may not proceed.
C. Read without the 'selective spin' this can easily be about one component
3/ or one phase, or even a milestone sign off. It seems implausible that the French President would ask whether an entire $90B contract was going to be cancelled via text and then not follow up.
1/ FACT CHECK:
Nancy Pelosi was repeating what Scott Morrison had said. Nancy was NOT making any assessment.
Shame on @smh for your deceitful headline (Included on tweet 4 if you aren't aware)
Who will tell Nancy Pelosi she met #ScottyFromMarketing
2/ Also worth noting, Nancy wasn’t making a ‘special’ statement, it was near the end of a press conference to with a focus on tax changes and supporting women.
The full transcript is here speaker.gov/newsroom/92321…
3/ If you have been lucky enough to not see this deceitful propaganda piece, here it is.
1/ $91M-GROSS NEGLIGENCE AND FAILURE:
A short thread to explain why this $91M grant is yet another consequence of the Liberal & National party abysmal failure in its role as custodians, regulators, auditors & managers of the Aged Care sector. grants.gov.au/Go/Show?GoUuid…
2/ The grant is to deal with staff and skill shortages.
8 years ago on the last sitting day before xmas the Liberals rammed through a bill to remove $1.2B meant to staff wages. Tony Burke got up to speak and was gagged. Please read the entire speech the Libs allowed.
3/ In 2011 Labor finalised the agreements with the states to make the federal government 100% responsible. This was a huge achievement, one of the reasons was the unclear responsibility for dealing with abuse. Inadequate staff numbers led to many abuses (e.g. use of sedation)
Some relevant & fun info that some people appear to be omitting.
Particular those with giant ego's claiming they are being specifically targeted by these changes.
1983-Public funding for parties began based on the price of a stamp
2/ With public funding came the need to ensure the system wasn't gamed. The amount of funding given in the 2019 election was $69M. In 1983 it was $7.5M
3/ The current number of 500 members👇 was established in 1983. The Senate Committee used this as a indication that genuine community support 4 the party existed. This number has not changed in 38 years
The 'issue of similar names was raised in 83 as well.👇 (Excerpt from Report)
1/ Doherty Model - Needs to be redone & released.
I intended to read & capture a few snippets of interest. However this appears to be a fatal flaw.
The TP value is assumed to be 3.5👇, no sensitive analysis was done for higher values. The CDC is using 5-9.5👇
2/ This model should be released so we (The tax payer and people who are expected to accept decisions made using the model) can interrogate these assumptions to see the impact of this and the many other 'assumptions'.
Other issues include;
-The use of nationwide assumptions..
3/ ..not allowing for differences at the state/ region/ remote/rural/etc. to be considered. Attached is a government funded paper on this topic and it makes this issue very clear.