Until the pre-print posts, I figured I would put together a thread for those who want to see the data. Many thanks to @wilfredo_nk, @kstdenis29, @EvanCLam, @adamnitido, @NaranbhaiVivek who have been up at all hours of the night both at the bench and writing the paper!
1/16
We generated harmless pseudoviruses decorated with spikes that represent circulating Delta and Omicron spike proteins. Compared to the Wuhan isolate, Delta has 9 mutations in spike, but Omicron has 34!
2/16
When we map these mutations onto the structure of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein it's clear that many of these cluster together near the "top" of the spike, in regions exposed to neutralizing antibodies.
3/16
We tested 239 samples from people who were fully vaccinated with Moderna, Pfizer or J&J. Within these groups we had people who were recently vaccinated, who got their shot 6-12 mo ago, or who were recently boosted. We also separated people with prior infection.
4/16
We used a robot-based neutralization assay to quickly measure the activity of samples as compared to the WHO standard.
5/16
Here's what we saw for people who got Moderna:
6/16
Here's what the data looked like for people who got Pfizer:
7/16
Here's what it looked like for people who got J&J:
8/16
When we directly compared neutralization of the original Wuhan isolate by people who hadn't or had been boosted, we saw fairly small differences for mRNA vaccines and a fairly large one for J&J.
9/16
What was really surprising was that an mRNA booster made a huge difference in the ability of people to neutralize Omicron.
10/16
We also checked the infectivity of our pseudoviruses and saw clear differences between the variant strains we tested, with Omicron showing greater ability to infect cells than any other variant.
11/16
When we quantified the slopes of these infections, we found that Omicron was almost 4 times more infectious than the original strain. Even more than Delta!
12/16
Overall, our findings suggest that boosting is doing a lot more than simply increasing your titers. It seems to be broadening the antibody response to be better equipped to recognize diverse variants. Hopefully it will still work against whatever variant comes next!
13/16
I want to stress that all of this work has been done with pseudovirus which is a model of coronavirus, but there are plenty of caveats in measurements like ours. Keep in mind that the virus has plenty of other immune responses to contend with (like T cells or NK cells).
For the curious few who may want to have the pre-print before it's available on MedRxiv, I've posted it to our lab webpage here: balazslab.partners.org/publications.h…
All of our spike expression plasmids are with @Addgene now and should be available to distribute shortly!
16/16
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I wanted to share one more figure from the #Omicron pre-print that I think offers some additional support for the idea that mRNA boosting doesn't just increase the total neutralizing response but instead "broadens" it to enable Omicron neuralization:
What these graphs show is a comparison of neutralization activity against the original strain (wild type) on the X axis and either Delta or Omicron on the Y axis. White dots represent samples from recently vaccinated, black squares from recently boosted individuals.
If you look at the slope of the dashed line through the white dots, you'll see that it's quite flat (especially for Omicron). This means that after getting the primary series of shots, neutralizing activity against wild type doesn't really predict the activity against variants.
Our paper describing the potential for mRNA vaccines to induce antibodies capable of neutralizing many of the circulating variants is now available online at Cell! cell.com/cell/fulltext/…
We created pseudoviruses representing many of the globally circulating variants, many containing numerous mutations in and around the receptor binding domain (RBD)
Using our previously described pseudovirus neutralization assay, we determined the potential for sera obtained from patients receiving one or two doses of the Pfizer (BNT162b2) or Moderna (mRNA-1273) vaccines.
As we wait for medRxiv, I wanted to share our complete results in a new thread. I want to stress that this is still a pre-print that has not yet undergone peer review. Many thanks again to @wilfredo_nk@EvanCLam@kstdenis29 and @NaranbhaiVivek for all of their hard work!
To test the potential for both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines to produce serum responses capable of neutralizing circulating #SARSCoV2 variants, we built a series of spike-expression plasmids:
The details of the mutations we made and a comparison between the strains can be seen in this figure:
We have just uploaded a pre-print to MedRxiv sharing our data on the potential for sera from recipients of currently administered mRNA vaccines to neutralize 10 different circulating strains of #SARSCoV2. Before it posts online, I'd like to put them into context. A thread:
1/12
Here's a key graph from our pre-print showing the results of our neutralization assay on sera taken from vaccinees receiving two or one dose of BNT162b2.
2/12
First off, we find (as other have reported) that several strains are neutralized as well as the D614G variant. These include strains such as B.1.1.7 (first described in the UK) and B.1.429 (first described in California, USA).
3/12