“We are not living in the 1930s & the Secretary of State & his team are not Nazis”.
Extraordinary @wesstreeting is left to point this out, in support of @sajidjavid, during the Covid debate in the Commons.
He’s right. He deserves our thanks.
But there’s more to it.
A 🧵/1.
To compare genuine public health measures, which of course have to weigh multiple difficult factors, with the brutal victimisation of Jews on the invented pretext that they spread disease, isn’t just wrong.
It’s vile.
And something many would see as Holocaust denial. /2.
But we shouldn’t pretend a clear & concerted assault on human & citizenship rights, protest, the rule of law, judicial independence & more, is “normal” in a decent, liberal democracy.
And anyone who understands the way public anxiety & the fragility of Germany’s Weimar constitution was exploited by extremists, ultimately causing a precipitate lurch toward disaster, can see the obvious parallels to current developments in the UK. /4.
Even more so in Poland & Hungary, which the UK Cabinet seems determined to emulate.
Not to mention Trump’s US, where the evidence emerging of an apparent conspiracy, on a grand scale, for violent overthrow of the constitution, is both deeply disturbing & relevant to us all. /5.
Complacency & knee-jerk dismissal of all comparisons with the 1930s & Nazis is no better than the behaviour of the Covid refuseniks who wear yellow stars or shout “Nazi” at any restriction proposed in support of public health. /6.
It used to be that “Godwin’s Law” was fair enough in most western democracies, most of the time.
Comparisons with Nazis were mostly egregious.
That time is long past. /7.
There are valid & urgent comparisons to Weimar & the Nazis. To ignore them is irresponsible.
There are idiotic, offensive ones. They are what they are.
If you’re unsure which is which, look carefully at the facts. And ask around, among people who understand the subject. /8. End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Johnson-Frost Brexit - dislocating the UK from the EU customs union & single market, & putting a border between GB & NI - is supported by about two thirds of Conservative MPs (& DUP).
About one third see serious & escalating damage to the UK from it. And never wanted it. /2.
Opposition MPs (ex DUP) also oppose the Johnson-Frost Brexit, precisely because of that damage.
Having voted in favour, with a “no deal” gun to their heads, doesn’t alter that.
Combined, that’s ~390 MPs who know it has to be reversed.
Brexit - Why? And What Next? An Empire On The Brink
The puffed-up nonentities - “Spartans”, “Bad Boys”, those posing as tough negotiators & defenders of sovereignty - are corks bobbing on a geopolitical ocean. Only able to wreck.
Serious people could help save the UK.
A 🧵/1.
The EU & NATO are American projects, central to the order the US has designed, built & led for 75 years.
The modern UK has flourished within, & strongly contributed to, both. And to the other main global security & economic structures of the US order.
As has the EU. /2.
The US has always been by far the single, leading, dominant force.
Brexit, & the wider turbulence within the EU, are late warning signs of a crisis of American power, one which has been a long time coming.
My suggestion that two foreign secretaries were extraordinarily bad at the job has led to a discussion of civil service impartiality, revealing deep misunderstandings about government in general & the civil service in particular.
Impartiality & objectivity are two core civil service (& diplomatic service) values. Integrity & honesty are others. I’ll focus here on the first two. But, of course, they’re all interlinked. /2.
Within the law, ministers, accountable to parliament, set policy. Officials advise on policy & on operational issues. They then execute ministerial decisions. /3.
We need to talk about drugs. Of course we do. Even @CommonsSpeaker does. But, unlike me, he’s just picking up traces from the loos near @BorisJohnson’s office.
I’ve been watching Yellow Submarine. And it got me thinking about the state of the world.
A trip … I mean, thread./1.
If you’re sensible, unlike me you’ll have had better things to do than hang out with the crowd who are busy trying to dismantle the foundations of what we’ve fondly thought of as civilised life. /2.
(We’ll be a lot fonder of it once it’s gone. So let’s not overdose on the self-criticism …).
Who are they? Political actors. Massively wealthy, often cynical, self-appointed visionaries. Journalist & academic satraps. Forget voters: the whole point is they should be putty. /3.
🤡 If you wonder how the UK got itself into such a disastrous position, look no further than @SirSocks & @NJ_Timothy.
🤡 One, an ex Downing St press secretary & ambassador to the US.
🤡 The other, an ex Downing St co-chief of staff. /1.
🤡 Neither, if you credit what they say, understands the NI Protocol or the Good Friday Agreement. Or what was said by those they seek to mock for not understanding precisely those agreements.
🤡 I’d try to help out. But I know each is well past listening.
🤡 It’s deeply depressing & more than a little disturbing to realise, as they foolishly reveal themselves by how they now sound off in public, the nature of some of the individuals who were entrusted with advising ministers over the years. /3.