OK so what's in the #RailActionPlan that @Transport_EU has finally put out?

18 page PDF here πŸ‘‡
transport.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2…

Summary in the 🧡
#EUYearOfRail
ERTMS by 2030 for the TEN-T core network, 2040 for the comprehensive network (brought forward from 2050)

πŸ€” solid and welcome proposal to improve interoperability, but how is the Commission going to make sure this happens?
A revision of the Technical Specifications for Interoperability in 2022

πŸ€” these Specifications have caused problems for the introduction of new trains, so simplifying rules here makes sense. Devil will be in the detail. Role for ERA here
A new trans-European transport network (TEN-T)
Regulation - a minimum line speed of 160 km/h for the core and the extended core network

πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ sounds nice, but this is a question of horses for courses. Will not work on some mountain routes, while speed will be much higher elsewhere
Strong focus on the delivery of the core network by 2030 and further planned high-speed rail connections in the extended core network to be realised by 2040

πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ what does this mean? Naming and shaming countries that don't build their bits?
In cooperation with @EIB, actively seek eligible pilot projects to acquire rolling stock under the Green Rail Investment Platform / InvestEU

πŸ‘ this could well be good, especially if the financing terms are good!
Prepare β€œgo-everywhere” passenger rolling stock specifications, in cooperation with ERA (expected 2022)

πŸ™‚ sounds nice. But the devil again will be in the detail. Is this going to be a 200km/h RIC passenger carriage...?
Clarify by 2023 the State aid rules on public funding of interoperable rolling stock [...] The issue of scrapping of existing rolling stock will be addressed

πŸ™‚ Some blogger wrote about this! jonworth.eu/the-eu-should-…
Propose in 2022 a revised regulatory framework for train drivers, addressing the shortcomings of the existing regime [...] Such a proposal may also include the language regime

πŸ™‚ addresses a major concern rail companies have. Again devil will be in the detail, but welcome
If necessary regulatory action in 2022 to improve capacity allocation and traffic management processes, aiming at better coordination [...] consider a Union-level entity overseeing the optimisation of cross-border rail traffic and coordination

πŸ‘ Could be v significant, good
Provide guidelines in 2023 for setting track access charges which support and encourage the development of long-distance and cross-border passenger services

πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ Bit wishy washy. Would also need to cover station access charges
Consider, in the context of the revision of the Railway Guidelines in 2023, the possibility to exempt the public financing of the reduction of track access charges from the notification obligation under State aid rules

πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ Is this crucial? Maybe if it helps, OK
The Commission will propose a Regulation, to be adopted by the end of 2022, on multimodal digital mobility services to enhance data exchange between mobility providers

πŸ•ΊThis could put right the mess of the Rail Passenger Rights Regulation. Again will depend on detail, but πŸ‘
Assess the need for an EU-wide VAT exemption for international train services

πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ Only a couple of countries now levy VAT on train tickets, and v few do at full rate. But anything that reduces train ticket prices a bit, sure, do it...
Support and promote air-rail multimodal journeys on routes where the suitable infrastructure is in place

πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ Bit wishy-washy. But perhaps with the multi-modal ticketing point there's something in it
The Commission will publish interpretative guidelines in 2022 for applying the Land PSO Regulation, including to long-distance and cross-border rail passenger services

πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ Keeps πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡©πŸ‡°πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ ministers happy. But we don't know what πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ thinks here. Jury's out
One thing missing: @EUAmbSchmidt promised there'd be something dedicated to the financing of night train rolling stock in the plan at a webinar last month, but there's not

I assume that did not make the cut... But the EIB loans could be used for that I think
So in conclusion a bunch of small to medium size changes that each will help a little bit, and nothing in here raises any sort of alarm bell for me

Solid work overall, and there are things to build on here...

/ends

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Jon Worth

Jon Worth Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jonworth

15 Dec
Right

Take a deep breath

Rather than just critique other maps, I have now made my own "Longest train journey" map - here it is

And there is a *huge* blog post to explain it! πŸ‘‡
jonworth.eu/the-longest-tr… Image
I use geodisic distance to calculate the longest trip - basically the two points on the globe furthest apart nominally connected by rail, taking into account the curvature of the earth
Any such really long route is impossible without a bit of walking in a few places

But I have two workable variants...

Heavy rail and walking *only* is
Cascais πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Ή - Woodlands πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬
11904.73 km

Add trams and metros and it's
Praia das Maçãs πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Ή - Changji MRT πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬
11923.23 km
Read 10 tweets
14 Dec
Now live on EBS @TimmermansEU @NicolasSchmitEU & @AdinaValean talking about climate transition and - why I am tuning in - the @Transport_EU action plan for cross border rail in Europe audiovisual.ec.europa.eu/en/ebs/live/1

I'll turn this into a thread, and will use #RailActionPlan
Here's the press release covering the #RailActionPlan ec.europa.eu/commission/pre…

But I cannot find the actual plan, despite @TimmermansEU having just mentioned it...
Sorry @transport_EU but where *is* the action plan? Not linked from the press release. Not on the DG MOVE website. We're listening to a press conference without seeing the document! #RailActionPlan
Read 6 tweets
14 Dec
So @EvaMontemaggi alerted me to this piece about plans for hydrogen trains in Italy

The piece is misleading, so it deserves a thread to take it all apart...

#EUYearOfRail #Decarbonisation

railway-technology.com/news/aecom-ape…
First, the piece speaks of the "300km Apennine line [...] This track stretches from the town of Sansepolcro in the northern province of Arezzo to Sulmona in the central province of L’Aquila"
All right, so let's look that up on Open Railway Map, electrification layer

It's the line highlighted here...

And 🀯 half of it is electrified already! Blue is ⚑️, black is ⛽️
Read 13 tweets
14 Dec
Also if you want the variants of this theoretical route, here's how to calculate the distances... assuming that at some point routes via Belarus or Ukraine, and into China open up again...
You need to use the geodisical distance calculator:
gps-coordinates.net/distance

You first need to define: what is a train?

Are we talking heavy rail? Or also trams and metros as well?
If it's heavy rail then starting point is Cascais station, west of Lisbon
Coordinates 38.7007835, -9.4207947

And end point Singapore Woodlands Checkpoint
Coordinates 1.44378, 103.7674213

11904.73 km
Read 6 tweets
14 Dec
OK, so I tried to work out if this is possible...

The answer is ⛔️ IT ISN'T ⛔️

At least not now

The 🧡 explains it
Basically whoever made this map read that there is now a new line through Laos, making the point furthest south east you can reach by train as Woodlands, Singapore πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ rather than southern Vietnam πŸ‡»πŸ‡³ as it was before

News about the new train πŸ‘‡
thediplomat.com/2021/12/laos-u…
But the PROBLEM is that politics and COVID have intervened to mean you cannot actually make all parts of this trip connect...
Read 18 tweets
13 Dec
With the UK's "Plan B" COVID restrictions due to be voted on tomorrow, and with a substantial Tory rebellion expected (probably enough to mean Johnson needs to count on Labour support), a 🧡 on relations between the PM, his backbenchers, COVID restrictions, and a new Tory leader
The media framing goes like this

The Number 10 parties showed there was one rule for the elite, and one for the little people
⬇️
This means fewer people will respect COVID restrictions
⬇️
Will result in greater spread, probably more deaths and pressure on NHS
⬇️
Replace Johnson
In the Tory Party each debate about restrictions has gone like this

Johnson (and Hancock, now Javid) want tougher restrictions
⬇️
Their credibility is shot within the party
⬇️
The price to rebel gets lower and lower
⬇️
So vote against the new restrictions
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(