I use geodisic distance to calculate the longest trip - basically the two points on the globe furthest apart nominally connected by rail, taking into account the curvature of the earth
Any such really long route is impossible without a bit of walking in a few places
But I have two workable variants...
Heavy rail and walking *only* is
Cascais 🇵🇹 - Woodlands 🇸🇬
11904.73 km
Add trams and metros and it's
Praia das Maçãs 🇵🇹 - Changji MRT 🇸🇬
11923.23 km
There are a few problems
Even though I found a route into Russia - by routing north of the Baltic Sea - there are no trains into China currently
I have hence mapped the route that is *most likely* to become possible, post COVID
There are two gaps
4.6km to walk between Haparanda 🇸🇪 and Tornio 🇫🇮
18.6km to walk between the new Vientiane 🇱🇦 and the start of the Thai rail network at Thanaleng
These routes require
30 trains, 4 changes of gauge, 23.9km walking - heavy rail & walking version
1 tram, 29 trains, 6 changes of gauge, 25.4km walking - heavy rail, trams, metros and walking version
As to how long each would take, and indeed how the hell to book tickets... sorry, but I did not get that far
And if any of my followers ever attempt this, DEFINITELY tell me
/ends
And there are 2 possible errors: apparently there are building works in Malaysia that might mess this up. And despite the fanfare it’s possible no passengers are allowed China to Laos. But I’ll check both of these tomorrow…
Oh and if you’re about to tell me Haparanda - Tornio is due to be electrified by 2023, and through running possible, I know. Thanks. By 2023 routes south of the Baltic might work too ;-)
Slightly updated version now available!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
ERTMS by 2030 for the TEN-T core network, 2040 for the comprehensive network (brought forward from 2050)
🤔 solid and welcome proposal to improve interoperability, but how is the Commission going to make sure this happens?
A revision of the Technical Specifications for Interoperability in 2022
🤔 these Specifications have caused problems for the introduction of new trains, so simplifying rules here makes sense. Devil will be in the detail. Role for ERA here
But I cannot find the actual plan, despite @TimmermansEU having just mentioned it...
Sorry @transport_EU but where *is* the action plan? Not linked from the press release. Not on the DG MOVE website. We're listening to a press conference without seeing the document! #RailActionPlan
First, the piece speaks of the "300km Apennine line [...] This track stretches from the town of Sansepolcro in the northern province of Arezzo to Sulmona in the central province of L’Aquila"
All right, so let's look that up on Open Railway Map, electrification layer
It's the line highlighted here...
And 🤯 half of it is electrified already! Blue is ⚡️, black is ⛽️
Also if you want the variants of this theoretical route, here's how to calculate the distances... assuming that at some point routes via Belarus or Ukraine, and into China open up again...
Basically whoever made this map read that there is now a new line through Laos, making the point furthest south east you can reach by train as Woodlands, Singapore 🇸🇬 rather than southern Vietnam 🇻🇳 as it was before
With the UK's "Plan B" COVID restrictions due to be voted on tomorrow, and with a substantial Tory rebellion expected (probably enough to mean Johnson needs to count on Labour support), a 🧵 on relations between the PM, his backbenchers, COVID restrictions, and a new Tory leader
The media framing goes like this
The Number 10 parties showed there was one rule for the elite, and one for the little people
⬇️
This means fewer people will respect COVID restrictions
⬇️
Will result in greater spread, probably more deaths and pressure on NHS
⬇️
Replace Johnson
In the Tory Party each debate about restrictions has gone like this
Johnson (and Hancock, now Javid) want tougher restrictions
⬇️
Their credibility is shot within the party
⬇️
The price to rebel gets lower and lower
⬇️
So vote against the new restrictions