There’s no way to understand this statement by the Vice Chair of the House January 6 Committee other than that it means the HJ6C *may* refer the likely 2024 GOP presidential candidate for federal criminal charges by DOJ.

That’s huge—even history-altering. cnn.com/videos/politic…
(PS) And it’s impossible to miss that this statement is being made by one of the Republicans who’d almost certainly run for the GOP nomination if Trump’s world—and therefore the GOP party and base as we know it—collapses before 2024.

Liz Cheney’s no dope—she’s just like her dad.
(PS2) As Donald Trump presidential biographer, I first wrote years ago that the Republican Party as we know it may cease to exist by 2030 or even 2025 due to Trump’s actions. If Trump were to be indicted, it could lead to a chain of events that splinters the GOP into two parties.
(PS3) We can’t know what Garland and DOJ would do with an HJ6C criminal referral on Trump—largely because we don’t know what evidence DOJ has gathered independently of Congress. But the pressure to move on Trump after a highly public congressional criminal referral would be high.
(PS4) While I’m a Trump biographer, not a Cheney family biographer, I don’t think any of us would consider it a stretch to say that when Trump ascended in the GOP and eventually began an effort to push the current Cheney scion out of it, the Cheneys’ approach to politics changed.
(PS5) That is to say, the question for Liz Cheney *now* is *not* whether she will be a leader in the Republican Party as it presently exists—that’s impossible; politically, she’s the walking dead—but whether she will lead one of the nation’s three parties after the GOP splinters.
(PS6) So when it is *Liz Cheney in particular* who goes on national television to use legal language to imply that the HJ6C *may* issue a criminal referral on Donald Trump, we’d better pay close attention—because when I say that would be a history-altering development, I mean it.
(PS7) This also confirms something I think many of us have known for a long time: over the next 24 months, Merrick Garland may have as much say in the future of the United States as President Biden.

It is impossible to overstate how *significant* a historical figure he could be.
(PS8) Candidly, I’d say the same about Cheney. I think legal/political analysts may have to adjust their thinking over the next 24 months to consider that others besides Joe Biden may actually become as influential—literally *as influential*—in U.S. politics. That’s a sea change.
(PS9) Consider: while Liz Cheney is just one member of Congress out of hundreds, if America’s two-party political system collapses in the next five years, it’ll almost certainly be because of decisions she makes. Just so, Garland holds the terms of the 2024 election in his hands.
(PS10) We know that in a call with RNC chair Ronna McDaniel late in his presidency, Trump threatened to leave the GOP. If he’s indicted, he’ll try to take the GOP over a cliff with him to new forms of insurrection. Cheney—and a few others—will reside at the fulcrum at that point.
(PS11) Based on the statement Cheney made yesterday, Biden must stay as far from Garland as he possibly can—and I mean long-term. If a referral is made on Trump, Trump will immediately claim that Biden is behind a plot to rig the 2024 election by incarcerating his opponent in it.
(PS12) So as the author of the most comprehensive insurrection coverage housed in a single media publication, do I believe the HJ6C and Congress will eventually send DOJ a criminal referral on Trump?

Yes.

Because the evidence PROOF and other outlets have compiled *requires* it.
(PS13) This means scenarios that right now sound like dire and desperate hypotheticals are *likely*—which is not the same thing as saying “certain”—to come to pass. Which means everyone in the political and legal and journalistic spheres should begin preparing for the future now.
(PS14) It is not clear that the GOP as we know it can survive a Trump indictment. It is not clear that rule of law as we know it could survive a refusal by DOJ to indict him. It is not clear how the 2024 election avoids descending into chaos if Trump needs to run to avoid prison.
(PS15) Will the GOP shut down the HJ6C if it takes Congress in early January 2023? Yes. Which is why we can be certain that Trump’s political and legal futures will reach a crisis point in the next year. There’s *no chance* the HJ6C doesn’t release a report before it’s disbanded.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethAbramson

14 Dec
I’ll admit to being a bit mystified by the January 6th evidence that major media chooses to focus on. Is it *interesting* that some personalities from FNC texted Meadows on January 6th? Sure. Does it rank in the top 500 most important pieces of evidence regarding January 6th? No.
Major media has some excellent lawyers working for it who do a good job—and could probably do an even better job—directing Americans to the January 6th evidence most significant for future coup-plotter prosecutions. And a text from Laura Ingraham ain’t it. Let’s get serious here.
I think major media was excited about the FNC texts because they gave certain outlets a chance to goose a competitor, report on people it knows viewers love to hate, and point out far-right hypocrisies. But are any of those tasks *new and important* ones—or are they old standbys?
Read 5 tweets
13 Dec
Sorry, J.K., but if a self-described trans (alleged) rapist is indeed a trans person, there’s no harm or foul here—the policy just ensures proper recordkeeping. And if the suspect *falsely* claims to be trans, that lie will be used against them at their rape trial. No issue here.
(PS) I can’t even tell what J.K. is getting at. Is she saying a trans person ceases to be so if they commit a rape? Is she saying governments should be empowered to strip people of their identity when/as they even *accuse* someone of a crime? Why do I think even she doesn’t know?
(PS2) Criminal law is one of those areas one must be careful tweeting about if one doesn’t know what the hell one is talking about. J.K. seems to believe that the police are *accepting* that a trans person who has not transitioned lacks a penis if that person identifies as trans.
Read 23 tweets
13 Dec
(THREAD) This thread includes my thoughts on the lengthy report just issued by the House January 6 Committee—which seeks a congressional referral to DOJ for Contempt of Congress against former GOP congressman and Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows. I hope you'll read on and share. Image
KEY REPORT POINT #1: Mark Meadows was on the January 2 conference call in which the January 6 plot was hatched—along with Trump, hundreds of state GOP legislators, the leadership of the domestic-terrorist "Stop the Steal" movement, and several other key Trump allies and advisers.
KEY REPORT POINT #2: As discussed at length by PROOF and other media outlets, the White House did indeed use Trumpist stooge and Pentagon plant Kash Patel in the run-up to January 6 and *on* January 6; Meadows was reportedly in "nonstop" contact with Patel as the attack unfolded.
Read 13 tweets
12 Dec
(🔒) As a retro gamer, I'm so excited about this new RETRO article, and the essay—free to all to read—that precedes its big reveal: "The Consensus Top 100 Underrated Nintendo Entertainment System (NES) Games of All Time." It's the best curation I've done. retrostack.substack.com/p/the-consensu…
(PS) Some of you may remember the preliminary version of this ranking, which did not *exclude* bestsellers, known consensus critical darlings, PAL- and JP-only releases, homebrews, and archival finds.

I have now made (or am still making) separate curations for those categories.
(PS2) Among the many things I'm doing at RETRO is trying to chronicle the NES Renaissance, the likes of which I don't think gaming—the world's biggest entertainment industry—has ever seen before. If you missed the work RETRO has already done on this, this thread can catch you up.
Read 9 tweets
11 Dec
I didn’t understand how broken video game journalism was and is until I saw this insane tweet by the Ars Technica creative director about WATA Games

Echoes of saying January 6 was just tourism when you cover politics TBH
I’m not trying to get upset about more broken things—I’m already upset about enough broken systems—but the fact that few critics appear to have played the best mobile games and the WATA scandal is understood by almost no one is legit evidence of a collapsed journalistic ecosystem
Dammit, I forgot to teach my journalism students at UNH to immediately block anyone who criticizes you for not doing the job you are paid to do. /s

Below is the tweet the Creative Director of Ars Technica doesn’t want you to see—as it explains why WATA Games can do as it likes.
Read 5 tweets
11 Dec
(🔒) NEW at PROOF: "Previously Unreported Insurrection Eve Video Confirms Stop the Steal Plot to Occupy the Capitol Long-Term Beginning on January 6"

There's no longer any serious doubt about what Team Trump's January 6 plan was. This video helps seal it. sethabramson.substack.com/p/new-previous…
1/ Across four extensive reports, PROOF has now established—beyond doubt—that the January 6 insurrectionists planned to storm *and occupy* the Capitol so that the joint session would be postponed long enough for Trump to send new slates of electors to Washington.

And Trump knew.
2/ And I'm not just referring to the paramilitaries at the Capitol on January 6: the Oath Keepers, the Proud Boys, the Three Percenters, the 1st Amendment Praetorians, and so on. The "Occupy the Capitol" plan depended on what Ali Alexander termed *civilian* "boots on the ground."
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(