"The appellant’s interest in being issued with an "X" passport is outweighed by considerations relating to the public interest put forward by the Secretary of State" /2
Fair Play For Women sought permission to intervene to represent the interests of women and girls. Permission was not granted but our submission made it clear this was not simply an admin matter. The outcome impacts others. /3
Last week Fair Play For Women threatened a judicial review if the deadline for public responses was not extended.
Today, the Government has conceded and will announce the deadline is to be extended by a further 8 weeks, more than doubling the consultation period to 14 weeks /2.
Two autistic women joined Fair Play For Women as co-claimants threatening legal action accusing the Government of breaking disability discrimination laws. /3
Legal action is an important tool in protecting the sex-based rights of women & girls. Supporters tell us they do, too. The right legal outcome can set a precedent, or stop one, and show public bodies they will be held to account. /1
When we raised funds to fight the ONS, we pledged to use any money left over to explore ways in which we can use the law to re-establish our boundaries /2
We’ve obtained legal advice on a range of issues, so we can identify the best ways to use the courts to help our cause. It’s not enough that something seems unfair or illogical; there also has to be a strong legal basis and an appropriate legal route to challenge or redress /3
THREAD: Fair Play For Women is back in court defending the meaning of sex. This time its the Scottish Government wanting to change sex into gender identity in the Scottish Census /1
The Scottish guidance is unlawful. It says people may self-identify when answering the sex question in the census.
“If you are transgender the answer you give can be different from what is on your birth certificate. You do not need a Gender Recognition Certificate. /2
The Scottish Government is ignoring the UK-wide 1920 Census Act and our win in the English High Court that sex CANNOT be self-identified /3
THREAD: Yesterday BBC2 are rather bland and uninspiring 90 minute documentary called "womanhood". But within it they spared 15 mins to cover "the trans debate". 😱 /1
First they went to a night club to meet a transgender woman called Evie. Evie passes so well that even the fiancée of 4 years didn't know his girlfriend had been born male. Cue lots of cooing and smiles from the celebs and Shirley Ballas asking the obvious question /2
Tense music.... the celebs are preparing for their next interview. Suzi tells us how she fears they might be "platforming some quite hateful views". She tells us how toxic it is and how it becomes a "slagging match". Suzi resolutely declares "I don't want any part of that!". /3
Baroness Jenkins asks @GEO minister whether she agrees that a small misclassification of sex can have a large distorting effect on gender pay gap in professions where <5% workforce is female /1
She gets a very unsatisfactory answer from the minister:
"no plans to change the guidance...gender pay is not supposed to be a data collecting exercise...to do so would increase the burden on employers" /2
Employers are obliged by law to COLLECT DATA on the gender pay gap and GEO publishes it.
And the point of it is to determine gap in pay between males and female
Of course its a data collection exercise! And of course sex matters! /3