_The Rebel Sell_, a critical analysis of counterculturalism and subculturalism, reviewed by @cshalizi . Much insight in the book; I drew on it when writing _How Meaning Fell Apart_.
@cshalizi Here’s the retrospective on _The Rebel Sell_ that @cshalizi linked. How have cultural politics changed since 2004, they ask? Subculturalism imploded (“authenticity” is no longer a thing). Social media sent us into the culturally-atomized era… induecourse.ca/the-rebel-sell…
@cshalizi I wrote about the atomization of meaning five years ago… I meant write much more… now perhaps everything I would have said is too obvious to bother with. meaningness.com/atomized-mode
@cshalizi Oh, I missed the link to @cshalizi’s review post. His monthly recommendations are always interesting; consider following him on twitter (he doesn’t post much). Also his papers on statistical theory are exceptionally insightful :)
@paulg My introduction to this topic is here… I promised more explanation, which is now on my short list. “Meaning isn’t objective, so it’s not real, just made up” is a common nihilist complaint, and it needs a serious reply.
@paulg “Objective meaning” is hard work to untangle, because everyone assumes, without thinking about it, that they know what “objective” means, but it’s a completely incoherent idea.
Further PSA: even if your state is not openly defying corrupt authority on the basis that high quality evidence shows boosters are incredibly effective and safe, if you just show up and get in the booster line, you’ll probably get one without questions.
I would never do such a thing, of course, but I have, uh, high quality evidence that this has happened recently in my vicinity.
Kinda weird… either you can defy the corrupt authorities by not believing them when they say the vaccine is safe and effective, or you can defy THE SAME ONES by illegally getting the same safe, effective vaccine they won’t allow you to have.
🌞 Seasonal affective disorder is caused by not enough sunlight. “Light boxes” using fluorescent bulbs were invented as a moderately effective treatment. They didn’t work well enough for me, and for years I used banks of halogen bulbs to produce brighter light.
🌞 In 2015 I realized LEDs used for commercial outdoor illumination had gotten powerful and cheap enough to replace halogens. Much better! Brighter! Whiter! Cooler! Cheaper! Longer-lasting!
🌞 Every year since then, LED lighting has improved, and I’ve experimented with better approximations to full sunlight. This was the 2016 edition: meaningness.com/sad-light-led-…
Anyone know what John Dunne's "Anatomy of the World," 1611, is on about here? Sounds like complaints about scientistic disenchantment, but the first new planet (Uranus) was 1781, and Gassendi's revival of atomism was mid-1600s. (So many new *what*?)
The text is a typical long incoherent repetitive depressed nihilistic rumination, so alluding to scientistic disenchantment would make sense, but science hadn't happened yet. Precognition? Time travel?
(Supposedly also one of the greatest English poems. Could have fooled me.)
This seems to be the answer—thanks Jake! Giordano Bruno was definitely a time-traveling alien, confirming my hypothesis.
Why has "wokeness" been so successful? This @everytstudies essay contains much wisdom. Notionally a review of a book, _Cynical Theories_. (I haven't read that, and suspect I like this essay more than I'd like the book.)
Red herring: Analysis of pop-wokeness in terms of its origin in pomo theory—apparently the main topic of the book—is fascinating for intellectual history geeks like us, but as @everytstudies points out, it's irrelevant to the mass movement, who don't know/care/understand that.
Self-interest, and group interest, drive politics, not ideology—that's just an excuse. Understanding the rise of wokeism requires analyzing its distinctive payoffs for the several different groups who benefit from it.
1️⃣ What we learn from Delphi silliness is that human moral judgements are made on the basis of the warm-fuzziness of individual words. (In its dataset, anyway.)
This probably explains 83.7% of culture war outrage.
2️⃣ Wait, is it true that human moral judgements are made on the basis of individual words?
No, of course not. But that’s the only way we can judge abstract decontextualized single-sentence statements. Those have nearly nothing to do with real-world ethics.
3️⃣ Delphi is an “AI” program that makes “moral judgements” about sentences you give it. I have just been informed that not everyone else’s timeline is full of examples of its giving stupid and/or offensive and/or hilarious answers: deepai.org/publication/de…