On the politicization & poletimicization of Halacha, a thread about the vaccine (or lack thereof)
Caveat: I am not discussing, nor interested to, the science behind the vaccines, or the politics associated with the pro/anti/cautious crowds.

I just want to clarify a point I’ve seen misused by both sides of the debate with regards to Halacha
The last thing any Jew who believes in Torah and would fall under the umbrella of what is defined as Orthodox do is “How can I fit the Halacha within my opinions”.

Now I am not accusing anyone of doing this consciously, but it’s always necessary to make a self-assessment of why
we believe what we believe, and what your motives are to be holding such and such a view.

When people start posting things like this, we have a problem:

(I have chosen this example because it could be verbatim be used by both sides, only swapping in different sources)
This is a complete distortion, and really the exact opposite of what a sound halachic approach needs to be.

Just because a Rabbi said that the last chicken he inspected was treif doesn’t mean he shouldn’t inspect the next one and can declare it treif without a new inspection.
Yes, with every plague, every disease, every vaccine, every new medication, every new situation, Halacha requires Rabbis to inspect the new reality all over again from scratch.

A real posek will always treat any question as a completely new one, and start from zero.
So, yes, when it comes to COVID, it is absolutely essential that halachic authorities look into it & formulate an opinion based on current events & current science, and as more facts come out, they need to either reiterate or modify their opinions as they see fit accordingly.
Any side who says ‘Halacha says that you have to do X during covid!’ is simply wrong. You have a variety of opinions and simply because the Rabbis you hold by themselves hold Y doesn’t mean it’s not valid for others to be holding Z, since that’s what their Rabbis hold themselves.
Now you might think they are wrong, just as they think you are wrong, but don’t bring “the Halacha” into it if both parties are both holding by valid authorities who believe differently.

To bring “the Halacha” is to falsely appeal to authority to make your point.
If Rabbi A said that a certain chicken is kosher, while Rabbi B said that it is not, those who follow Rabbi A & eat the chicken would in no way be eating treif. Those who follow Rabbi B would not be eating a chicken that for them *is* treif. Basic Beis Hillel Beis Shammai stuff.
I see this from all sides of the issue, the stronger their political (for lack of a better term) beliefs in one side or another, the more likely they are to bandy about the names of Rabbis to claim the other side is entirely wrong.

“Judaism” & “Halacha” are not rhetorical tools.
On a religious aspect, no side can be called wrong on this issue. They are both free to follow their respective authorities. Now you might think that medically they are wrong and that you are in the right, but that’s an entirely different debate.

Don’t bring Halacha into it.
And the most important point of all: be respectful of each other’s. Don’t become the fanatics who plague us & prevent the Temple from being rebuilt because of sinat chinam.

If someone is doing something they have halachic backing for, even if you disagree with it personally
the last thing you should do is insult them or hate them for it ch”vs. They might be wrong for doing what they do, but what you are doing is much worse

We will only bring Mashiach if we have tolerance, love and respect for each other’s, not if we point fingers & scream hatefully
Especially if the reason we do it is because we both believe something different while both trying to uphold Torah.

May we all merit the coming of Mashiach tsidkeinu b’karov mamash, and that all sicknesses, of the body, mind and soul, be eradicated once & for all.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with shevereshtus

shevereshtus Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shevereshtus

2 Dec
On Judaism's position on abortion, and injecting Judaism in the American abortion debate; a thread.
I wasn't going to involve myself at first. People get too emotional and are unwilling to discussing things politely, but after seeing so much misinformation & misinformed posts over the last two days, so I had to say this:

Judaism is neither "pro-life" nor 'pro-choice".
Caveat: I'm not interested in a political debate, nor about the morality of abortion. I'm not here to discuss Roe v. Wade, the Constitution, whether it's healthcare or any other modern political issues. All I am doing is showing what's the traditional Jewish position on the issue
Read 33 tweets
21 Nov
If someone said

“The fact that I eat meat doesn’t invalidate my veganism”, you’d laugh

“The fact I’m eating doesn’t invalidate my fasting”, you’d roll your eyes

“The fact I’m married doesn’t invalidate my celibacy”, you’d groan

A thread about Hanukkah & intellectual honesty
The Jewish people is named Israel. One of the reasons why, our Sages say, is that Jews are meant to be Yashar E-l, straight with G-d.

To be intellectually honest is one of the most important virtues in all of Judaism. That’s why it’s important to make a simple the distinction:
Your innate Jewishness cannot be affected by what you do. A Jew is a Jew is a Jew. Even if ch”vs a Jew is eating a cheeseburger with bacon on Yom Kippur while sitting in a church, he is still Jewish (even if Halacha dictates we treat him differently as a result)

However:
Read 7 tweets
9 Nov
Here is an explanation of the view of Orthodox Judaism towards the Reform & Conservative moments and, more importantly, of Jews who are members of these movements.

A thread
First off I realize that this is a very delicate subject, so I would ask anyone reading this to please put their pre-existing views on the subject at the door and read the whole thread before replying. Even through disagreements, it is still possible to have a polite conversation
Before I address the view of Orthodoxy towards Reform & Conservative movements (R&C), let me clarify what is meant by Orthodoxy: the traditional way Judaism has been observed & codified throughout history, from the mishna to the Shulchan Aruch & it’s immutable principles.
Read 21 tweets
27 Oct
This is an often repeated lie, completely baseless.

With only a cursory look at the actual sources it can easily be debunked; a short thread.
You can see it in the Torah in multiple instances: Abraham's child is only Jewish through Sarah and not Hagar, Esav's children are not Jewish because of his wives, there is a verse in Deuteronomy that points out a non-Jewish man and Jewish woman produce a Jewish child as well.
Then you can see it in Ezra & Nechemia when the prophet tells the Israelite men in Bavel to 'leave their foreign wives and her children' (as in, not theirs) behind & come back with him in repentance & to Israel.

Patrilineal lineage was always only about the tribe, not Jewishness
Read 7 tweets
12 Sep
Have you ever asked yourself 'Why is it I never heard about Lord Rindsfleisch before?!" or 'What's the connection between him & King Richard I, the Lionheart, exactly?'

Well, you're about to do both; a short historical thread.
The year is 1298. Bavaria and the surrounding region are in the midst of a civil war between King Adolf of Nassau & Emperor Albert of Austria.

The Jews found themselves without the protection they had been afforded by the latter until then.
A man called 'Lord Rindsfleisch', either because he was a knight or so nicknamed because of his acts of butchery (Rindsfleisch means 'Butcher', 'Beef' in modern German) claimed that the Jews of Rottingen had stolen & tortured a consecrated host, a common medieval accusation.
Read 11 tweets
10 Sep
Rav Saadia Gaon explains that this week's parasha is 'divided' in two, as we read Nitzavim last week, and Vayeilech this week. This is in contrast to other double parashiot, which are joined together. What's the difference?

A short message on Rosh Hashana, Kippur & Jewish Unity.
To join two entities means that you are taking two disparate elements and associating them to each others. They existed on their own, but through commonalities, they can be joined together but are never quite one.

Those parashiot share a common 'theme', but stand on their own.
When you divide something, first it was one, and then separated. Even though it is now technically standing on it's own, it is inexorably linked to what it was cut from.

Usually we read both before Rosh Hashana, and the theme is Jewish unity. What is gained by separating it?
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(