The problem with many of the so-called "Hindutva" thinkers is that they have internalized colonial ideas but parrot them as necessary to be "modern" and "progressive." They share the contempt the Left has for native culture; just in a different flavor.
India has a largely agrarian population. Marriage age is already an area where the police state intrudes in rural and tribal life, "civilizing" them for their own good with top-down extortive laws.
In most countries, children can marry younger with parental consent.
In India parents (and society) is deemed to be "backward" and in need of "fixing" by urban policy makers sitting in Delhi. Parents & children are deemed incapable of deciding.
Q: "why is this colonial?"😏
What is colonial, and patriarchal, is the relation and attitude that the State takes toward society and people.
When it frames laws completely out of touch with society, the implication is that society is wrong and needs to be "civilized." The State does not *represent* society.
The US was just an example because Indians are deluded that so-called "child marriage" (in reality teen marriage) represents Indian "backwardness." In fact, it is common the world over.
And this won't do anything against #LoveJihad. Likely make it worse.
1. Raising marriage age does not change the age of sex. 2. Consequently, raising marriage age, increases unmarried motherhood. 3. This is what the West is grappling is. This is what the State is pushing India towards.
It is legal 1. To have sex at 18 2. To give birth to a child at 18
BUT 3. If you ask the father of the child to marry you, we'll throw you both in jail.
Aim is to "develop" like the West in unmarried teen mothers?
Wild fantasy that drives this decision-making. "Let them finish college."
India does not live in this one delusion of "modernity." Nor can it be pushed into it. The outcome will be more unwed mothers scraping by and being victimized, not "college."
1. Not everyone goes to college. 2. Not everyone is benefitted in going to college. 3. There is not ONE model of society; to be pushed by state diktat.
At the same time, Christian schools aimed at the middle class do "soft"-peddling of Christianity. They know that explicit conversion would be problematic.
Abuse and forced conversion is reserved for the poor or those with less power to protest.
Oh I agree. And also ZERO state funding and land grants, return of the all the leases occupied during colonial rule and now expired. No discrimination by the state in RTE.
I'm not against people getting vaccinated for Covid. India's high vaccination has happened largely without mandates.
I am opposed to govt mandates and forcing people to inject something into their body. People must be able to make their own risk-reward decision. #MyBodyMyChoice
So what else do you want to force upon people? Fast food is unhealthy, close all fast food joints. High fat causes heart attacks, fills hospitals, ban fat? Or maybe carbs or sugar are the problem. Ban them all, let's rule human choices by mandate.
1. Indians' domestic success is throttled by bureaucracy . 2. Indian quotas kill meritocracy. #Wokeism is a rounding error compared to quotas. 3. #EnglishApartheid ensures only a fraction of India's talent develops vs China eg.
In Asia, universities from China, with Chinese-medium, dominate. Other Asian countries, using their own languages, also excel. (Singapore is city-sized—an outlier).
No Indian University is in the top 50 in Asia. "English advantage" in higher education? 😆 usnews.com/education/best…
A few Indian graduates do well abroad due to the sheer selectivity ratio. Of the 1.3 billion population .0001% may succeed in this manner, just because in such a large set there will be some brilliant people who succeed *despite* the education system.
We've adopted "cutting the cake" for birthdays. This originates from Christian weddings, where "cutting the wedding cake actually represents breaking the bride's hymen." (for end of virginity).
We Indians copy blindly just like we sing "ring-a-ringa roses" uncomprehendingly.