This is work led by @c_drosten and Jan Felix Drexler, and congrats to first author @ana_lenina, and the other co-authors.
Quick background: SARS-CoV-2 is unique among SARSr-CoVs in having a short stretch of basic amino acids in its Spike protein, the FCS,
2/
This motif allows SC2 to infect lung cells and is likely a key to this virus's high transmissability. It is the secret sauce that allowed it to become a pandemic pathogen (along with other features like Spike's ability to bind well to proteins on human cells)
3/
In the figure of the preprint, you can see SC2's "RRAR" FCS, along with similar motifs in SARSr-CoVs from Europe, Africa and Asia. 4/
A polybasic FCS in a bat may provide no advantage, since the virus infects bats' guts not, lungs. But should a bat virus with an FCS, or something close to it, find its way into a mammal, it becomes very important indeed.
5/
We see this with avian flu (as the authors note). Many variants that infect ducks and other waterfowl are low path in other birds, such as chickens, in part because they lack a polybasic FCS at the cleavage site (a spot between the two main parts...
6/
...of the hemagglutinin (HA) protein, flu's version of the Spike protein).
HA and Spike are the parts of each virus that stick to the surface of our cells and facilitate entry into cells.
But something interesting happens in the crowded conditions of chicken farms... 7/
...from time to time. A variant of low path evolves into high path avian flu by acquiring a polybasic FCS. This puts the HA on a hair trigger in terms of being cleaved into separate chunks thus making it able to facilitate entry to the cells of chickens' respiratory tracts.
8/
This can involve just a single mutation, which might be present at low frequency in ducks, or might evolve from a de novo mutation in chickens once there is strong selection in a chicken farm for a functional FCS.
9/
So, three products of chicken farms: eggs, meat and furin cleavage sites...the latter of which make the virus lethal for both chickens and, should they be exposed, humans.
10/
Back to CoVs. In samples from two European bats, the authors found SARSr-CoVs that were just one mutation away from a functional FCS. But minor variants were sequenced from each that *had* a functional FCS already, just as is seen with some low path flu.
11/
Now, as they note, this could just be sequencing error. But let's imagine for a minute that it is not. Drop that virus into, say, a raccoon dog farm, and it will quickly be selected to generate an efficient respiratory pathogen. Big H/T to @stgoldst here.
12/
By the way, when I say drop, I mean it literally.
Now, instead, imagine the low frequency variant is not present in the progenitor SC2 population in bat poop that lands in a raccoon dog cage. Just as on a chicken farm with flu, a single de novo mutation within... 13/
...the unlucky raccoon dog that is infected with the bat virus - or in another raccoon dog down a small transmission chain on the farm - provides a tremendous advantage to the lucky virus, and its progeny then sweep through the farm.
14/
We see it repeatedly with avian flu. These results show that SARS-CoV-2 is likely just one more instance of this process, just in a different virus. Bat viruses related to SC2 are just one small, predictable step away - or no steps at all in rare cases - from an FCS.
15/
Hence, the authors' conclusion:
"Furin cleavage thus likely emerged from the SrC bat reservoir via molecular mechanisms conserved across reservoir-bound RNA viruses, supporting a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2."
Doesn't get more important than that. Tour de force.
16/
Coda: Rural Hubei province, particularly out west in Enshi Prefecture, had a *massive* industry of farming mammals such as raccoon dogs for fur and food. Perhaps 3/4 million animals culled in early 2020, with none to my knowledge tested for SC2 by PCR or serology.
17/
It is also home to one of the biggest cave complexes in China, with large populations of the horseshoe bats that harbor SC2-related bat CoVs.
"Hundreds of caves are spread throughout the mountains of Enshi prefecture, an agricultural corner of China's Hubei province. The most majestic, Tenglong...is one of China's largest karst cave systems, spanning 37 miles of passages that contain numerous bats.
19/
"Nearby are small farms that collectively housed hundreds of thousands of wild mammals such as civets, ferret badgers and raccoon dogs before the pandemic, farm licenses show."
20/
Here's one civet farm visited by @mstandaert, just downhill from one of those caves.
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The authors of that study reported a very low frequency of mutants within the bat samples with mutations that would give them a functional furin cleavage site. @jbloom_lab has emphasized that those data cannot be taken as indicative of the presence of those mutants...
2/
Because they could simply be errors. Although both the authors and I noted this, I agree with Jesse that the sequencing data provide no evidence of the presence of the mutants.
3/
Intemperate attacks? No, @mattwridley, it is not at all intemperate to call you out as I did. It needs to happen more often. Says the purveyor of disinformation, "how DARE you accuse me of spreading disinformation!"
But take 100 cases by Dec 1. Even assuming a 4.1 day doubling time, you're looking at 7-8 doublings in December. That means 12,800 to 25,600 infections. The WHO-China report reports 168 cases in Wuhan with symptom onset before Dec 31.
3/
So sad to see you of all people, @RichardDawkins, being taken in by and amplifying the antiscientific misinformation and disinformation put out by @mattwridley regarding the origin of #SARSCoV2. 1/
If you'd be willing to read some of the scientific literature that would put you in a position to assess whether Matt is balanced and fair-minded, here are a 3 recommendations. (Also, I would encourage you to read Matt's tweets on the subject, and see how balanced they are.)
2/
Paper # is a stunning study led by Xiao Xiao and Zhaomin Zhou, with our Oxford Zoology colleagues @WildCRU_Ox. It put the lie to the Chinese delegation's assertion in the WHO-China report that no live, illegal wildlife was sold at Huanan Market. 3/
"Chinese Scientist Hits Back at [my ] Wuhan market coronavirus origin paper"
Dr. Liang Wannian, the lead scientist on the WHO-China study on SC2's origin, has badly misunderstood or misrepresented the science here. Some thoughts in a 🧵, 1/33
What is clear to me from Liang's comments is that the Chinese regime is *deeply* fearful of the strong evidence that places the origin of the pandemic at Huanan Market. But first it is incumbent upon me to acknowledge that he raises one important point. 2/
Although it was a tangential point in my paper in @ScienceMagazine (see below), Liang asserts that the earliest known case *was* a Mr Chen, an accountant with no connection to Huanan Market, with symptom onset of Dec 8, not 16. 3/ science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
Short 🧵
No, it's not just as risky @ydeigin.
This ridiculous comment captures perfectly a growing concern I have. A much-needed discussion about making pathogen research as safe as possible is getting hijacked by the SARS-CoV-2 origin debate. 1/
People who lack expertise can sometimes make important contributions. But often those with expertise are in a better position to do so.
My daughter is going to have a complicated surgery soon, and I would like her surgeon to decide how to do it as safely as possible. 2/
I am relying on the surgeon's expertise and experience to inform his sense of proportion, something that is lacking in many believers in a lab leak origin of SARS-CoV-2 when it comes to lab safety. 3/