1/ Omicron is ripping through America right now, to an extent we won't fully realize until later
At this point, I think most people can hope to delay infection, but not to avoid it.
I don't think herd immunity is a realistic goal anymore
Here's what I think it means for us
2/ Even as the Delta wave continues to kill over a thousand people a day, Omicron is already here, and there is no reason to believe that the explosive growth we have seen in other countries, and in local outbreak (like Cornell University) isn't happening across the US already.
3/ an Intrinsic infectiousness that is perhaps 2-3 times higher than Delta, with a short incubation time, and at least some measure of immune escape- means that we are unlikely to get Rt below 1 (and the outbreak quenched) before it rips through a large proportion of susceptibles
4/ The good news is that it is certainly not worse than Delta, and quite possibly better in terms of severity- especially when infections occur among those with prior immunity from vaccine or infection.
So what does it mean for us individually?
It's liberating in a sad way.
5/ I can stop worrying about the social obligation of trying to contain the epidemic more broadly, and focus on my immediate circle
I am not immunocompromised and I am vaccinated and boosted.
Everything would indicate that I will be fine if infected (and that seems inevitable)
6/ those who are choosing not to get vaccinated will see explosive rates of infection, and will become immunized (and some will get very sick). I can't do anything about that.
I am most worried about the immunocompromised and the elderly. (The children were never at high risk)
7/ for them, it just became a lot harder.
They will have to boost certainly if they haven't already. But also to isolate, to ventilate, to use N95 masks, and to hope that they can delay the inevitable until the antiviral pills are available in.. weeks?
8/ the other big concern right now is whether hospitals and healthcare facilities will be even more overwhelmed and overrun, with the increase in mortality it would portend.
The fact that omicron has at least some immune escape ... is reassuring to me.
Here's why
9/ to explain Omicron rapid replacement of Delta, it would have to be a combination of intrinsic infectiousness and immune escape.
The more the immune escape, the less the Ro, and vice versa.
9/ if it was all freakishly high Ro among the unvaccinated, uninfected, then the pockets where we have those would be absolutely ablaze, and local hospitals overwhelmed.
The fact that we know there's at least some immune escape suggests a more general, evenly distributed spread
10/ (small blessings, I know)
What does this mean for "the authorities"?
First, we HAVE TO protect the most vulnerable elderly, those in nursing homes, with boosters. NOW. It's criminal to wait on this.
16/ if it turns out that Omicron is less deadly than Delta, it could end up rapidly "immunizing" all corners of the globe, and "boosting" those of us with pre-existing immunity, and preventing the spread of more severe strains.
(Let us pray)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
They looked at UK COVID cases with (n=208,947) and without (n=15,087) the dropout associated w Omicron, and perform regression analyses to see what factors could predict Omicron
Date, for one
3/ for example, to predict whether a case is Omicron, you could find a clue by whether they are a reinfection (breakthrough).
There were 4,100 reinfections, but 36% of them were in the dropout group, compared w only 7% of the total cases. (OR 6.55 after controlling for all else)
We've often heard people say something like "this innovative new service/company is good for patients and saves money, but there's no business model for it/ current reimbursement doesn't support it"
Step 1: Let's generate examples:
2/ I'll start.
But this is a group exercise, I need your nominations. Please try to give suggestions with some evidence behind them
*Advanced Care Planning
*Hospital at home
*Diabetes prevention program
*"SDOH" care navigation
(Used to be, telehealth)
3/ great work, tweeple
Clearly no shortage of ideas (with varying level of evidence) for things that could save money and be good for patients
The view espoused by many (including yours truly) has been that these services will flourish under value-based care
2/ As the title implies, the best way to think about the problem is that Private Equity points the way towards every opportunity for outsized financial gains, especially where there is arbitrage, or market failures.
PE investors use the word "rents" in a positive way
3/ As @brianwpowers@WillShrank have pointed out, if you create outsized opportunities in new payment models, private capital can accelerated that too
Though IMO they undersell the degree to which PE-backed groups in MA tend to focus on...risk adjustment
Can we measure "likely unnecessary admissions" somehow?
...and to be clear, I am not sympathetic to the idea that we should somehow minimize the terrible negative impact of covid on hospitals and ICUs being full
2) it's true that good policy can align private profit with public good, but if we are going to rely on that, need tight surveillance and fast response from regulators to close arbitrage opportunities where short-term profit maximizers will gather. c/f surprise billing
3/ if you wait too long, then entrenched profits become normalized, powerful incumbents are formed, and they can, and will, exert political influence to keep the "status quo" in place.
Many health policy examples (facility fees, drug pricing). But also...Medicare Advantage 👀