🧵In case you need convincing or reminding - here's why we need to block this bill: [1/15]
This is a great summary by @_BvdM on Clause 9. To reiterate, the power to strip citizenship in some cases already exists; it is the notice provision that is new. But it IS a lurch into (more) authoritarianism. And guess who it will target? newstatesman.com/politics/2021/… [2/15]
I have a more specific concern about the potential use of Clause 9 against ex-prisoners - a similarly worded clause in Borders Act 2007 is used to deport Black and brown ex-prisoners who hold ILR. (@followMFJ do excellent work to stop charters)
Then there are the human rights and dignity of non-Britons. This piece of trash-masquerading-as-legislation will take a hammer and chisel to an international refugee protection system that is already at breaking point. [5/15] refugee-action.org.uk/about/facts-ab…
Priti's straw man - a "migrant" jumping the queue, crossing the channel in a dinghy by *choice*, for economic advantage - slips into media + right wing rhetoric of people coming here to steal benefits/jobs.
And how do we know that @ukhomeoffice rhetoric - that the Bill will in fact abolish risky crossings, shut down criminal human-trafficking operations, and protect refugees, is predicated on lies? @ZoeJardiniere will take you through it: [7/15]
There is a particular sickness in trying to brand these proposals as intended for the protection of victims of modern slavery. More on the expansion of immigration detention and its conflation with modern slavery in this excellent policy brief: [10/15] labourexploitation.org/publications/d…
Finally, the Windrush perspective. We know from painful experience that immigration law and unchecked Home Office power can and will be weaponised for political ends. That is the Windrush scandal - I summarise it in the first few pars here: [11/15] goodlawproject.org/news/windrush-…
In the NABB provisions targeting Britons, the Home Office is asking for *more* open-ended powers.
How do you think this is going to end? Who do you think is going to suffer as a direct consequence of Clause 9? [12/15]
Windrush victims are alarmed by this law. It is everything govt has supposedly "learned lessons" not to do, on an even bigger scale. Priti Patel is nowhere near cleaning up the wreckage of the Windrush scandal. Now she wants more power, to do more damage. [13/15]
Windrush victims also know that govt is pandering to an anti-refugee, anti-migrant base in the border clauses. A base born of racism and xenophobia.
Fan those flames enough, and the resultant fire will consume Britons of minority ethnic and racialised groups. [14/15]
It has been clear for a while that @ukhomeoffice is unfit to run the Windrush Compensation Scheme, and unwilling to make the kind of changes needed to fix it. You've probably seen us "calling" for the Scheme to be moved.
With @GoodLawProject, we have started the process to seek judicial review of @pritipatel's decision to keep control of the Windrush Compensation Scheme. It's a decision that is mind-boggling in one sense bc @ukhomeoffice is demonstrably terrible at running the scheme; [2/6]
but in another sense, it was inevitable - the HO does not and will never accept that Windrush victims need genuine reparation, and that the process should be approached in the same way as it would if the victims were white, wealthy and/or of a different social class. [3/6]
The headlines are: (i) the Select Committee believes the Scheme should be administered independently, and isn't sure why it was ever run in-house, so to speak; (ii) total number eligible STILL UNKNOWN, low uptake of those known to be eligible; [2/]
(iii) applications *require* legal assistance, i.e. this is not a DIY job as @sajidjavid, @pritipatel and others have variously claimed. The SC recommends extending LASPO 2012 to cover this + says We Are Digital, which also has other @ukhomeoffice contracts, is insufficient; [3/]
This evening, the charity Justice launched their report on ‘Reforming the Windrush Compensation Scheme’ – we’ve not had the chance to read the full report yet but wanted to share some initial thoughts from the launch. [1/n]
The main themes of the report are a lack of trust among claimants, exacerbated by the lack of independence of the Scheme, a series of procedural and structural problems with the Scheme, and a general lack of compassion, empathy and respect in the handling of claims [2/n]
The main and most important (TL;DR) recommendation is that the Scheme should be taken away from the Home Office because the aims of the Scheme are undermined by the lack of independence of the Scheme. Cannot emphasise our agreement with this enough. [3/n]
Remember Sitting in Limbo? It's about Anthony Bryan and his wife, Janet McKay-Williams, 👌🏽 played by @peerobinson and @_NadineMarshall. It won an entire Bafta.
Guess how Anthony and Janet have been getting on with the Windrush Compensation Scheme?
1/26
@peerobinson@_NadineMarshall Anthony arrived as an 8 yr-old in 1965. In 2015, he was fired, and lost access to benefits and the NHS along with his income. He was then detained and threatened with deportation, then released, then detained and threatened with deportation. He became a shadow of himself.
2/26
@peerobinson@_NadineMarshall Janet held down the fort and supported him, putting her own life on hold. She chased MPs; compiled evidence; fought with staff at HO reporting centres; and with family and friends, scraped together the fees to win an injunction preventing Anthony's imminent deportation.
3/26
This eve, @Channel4News will feature an item on @RichardSBlack1. He came to Britain as a small child and lived here for many years before he was refused re-entry following a visit to Trinidad. That decision - which was wrong, as Richard was a citizen - has shaped his life. [1/7]
Richard was left destitute in Trinidad, and his family was carved up, with his then-wife and children able to remain in the UK. @ukhomeoffice materially altered the course of Richard’s life. But that’s not the worst of it. [2/7]
After publicity and a number of direct approaches, former Windrush Compensation Scheme head Tom Greig and others at @ukhomeoffice promised Richard he would be repatriated, at govt’s cost, THIS SUMMER.
As previously mentioned, Greig has been pulled off Windrush matters. [3/7]
🚨 alert, 🧵 alert: one of our members received a letter containing this little kicker today, in response to their application to the Windrush Compensation Scheme.
Join me on a journey of rage. [1/14]
This appears at the end of a letter requesting more information, which is something caseworkers can do according to the Casework Guidance, currently on version 7. The rules on requesting more evidence begin on p 89. [2/14] assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
The claimant in question hasn't received any other demands or requests for evidence. They haven't even been told of an assigned caseworker. This is the first time they've seen a request for further evidence.